These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3868017)

  • 1. Replica techniques for in vivo studies of tooth surfaces and prosthetic materials.
    Ekfeldt A; Flöystrand F; Oilo G
    Scand J Dent Res; 1985 Dec; 93(6):560-5. PubMed ID: 3868017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Replication of human occlusal tooth attrition surfaces for scanning electron microscopic study.
    Akpata ES; Winter PJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 1991 Jan; 18(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 2051248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Replication techniques for the scanning electron microscope. 1. History, materials and techniques.
    Barnes IE
    J Dent; 1978 Dec; 6(4):327-41. PubMed ID: 282304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surface reproducibility of resin die materials with various impression materials.
    Kozono Y; Kakigawa H; Tajima K; Hayashi I
    Dent Mater J; 1983 Dec; 2(2):169-78. PubMed ID: 6586349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of impression materials for direct multi-implant impressions.
    Wee AG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Mar; 83(3):323-31. PubMed ID: 10709042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dental plaque morphology as revealed by direct observation and by replicating techniques.
    Lie T; Gusberti F
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1978; 36(5):279-88. PubMed ID: 281102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of detail reproduction for three die materials by using scanning electron microscopy and two-dimensional profilometry.
    Derrien G; Le Menn G
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Jul; 74(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 7674178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Surfaces of stone models made by the laminated single impression technique with silicone materials (author's transl)].
    Daito K; Miyauchi H; Okuno T; Mitani S; Takatsu T
    Nihon Shika Zairyo Kikai Gakkai Zasshi; 1974 Jun; 31(2):27-31. PubMed ID: 4620680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Randomized controlled clinical study on the accuracy of two-stage putty-and-wash impression materials.
    Haim M; Luthardt RG; Rudolph H; Koch R; Walter MH; Quaas S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):296-302. PubMed ID: 19548415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An objective method for measuring the surface morphology of cavities and restorations in vivo.
    Elderton RJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 1977 Oct; 4(4):323-34. PubMed ID: 335031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of marginal degradation of restorations on impressions.
    Jokstad A; Mjör IA
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1991 Feb; 49(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 2024571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dimensional accuracy of an epoxy resin die material using two setting methods.
    Paquette JM; Taniguchi T; White SN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Mar; 83(3):301-5. PubMed ID: 10709038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dimensional accuracy of epoxy resins and their compatibility with impression materials.
    Aiach D; Malone WF; Sandrik J
    J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Oct; 52(4):500-4. PubMed ID: 6594508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Compatibility of a new epoxy resin with impression materials.
    Schelb E; Baracat SA; Almaguer R
    Am J Dent; 1990 Aug; 3(4):171-4. PubMed ID: 2076244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Systematic inquiry in tests of negative/positive replica combinations for SEM.
    Bromage TG
    J Microsc; 1985 Feb; 137(Pt 2):209-16. PubMed ID: 3886915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
    Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability of the impression replica technique.
    Falk A; Vult von Steyern P; Fransson H; Thorén MM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2015; 28(2):179-80. PubMed ID: 25822305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dimensional accuracy of improved dental stone and epoxy resin die materials. Part II: Complete arch form.
    Chaffee NR; Bailey JH; Sherrard DJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Mar; 77(3):235-8. PubMed ID: 9069076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance of fast-setting impression materials in the reproduction of subgingival tooth surfaces without soft tissue retraction.
    Rudolph H; Röhl A; Walter MH; Luthardt RG; Quaas S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(4):366-75. PubMed ID: 25010882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.