138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38682527)
1. Screening Automation in Systematic Reviews: Analysis of Tools and Their Machine Learning Capabilities.
Sandner E; Gütl C; Jakovljevic I; Wagner A
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2024 Apr; 313():179-185. PubMed ID: 38682527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Research Screener: a machine learning tool to semi-automate abstract screening for systematic reviews.
Chai KEK; Lines RLJ; Gucciardi DF; Ng L
Syst Rev; 2021 Apr; 10(1):93. PubMed ID: 33795003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A question of trust: can we build an evidence base to gain trust in systematic review automation technologies?
O'Connor AM; Tsafnat G; Thomas J; Glasziou P; Gilbert SB; Hutton B
Syst Rev; 2019 Jun; 8(1):143. PubMed ID: 31215463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A narrative review of recent tools and innovations toward automating living systematic reviews and evidence syntheses.
Schmidt L; Sinyor M; Webb RT; Marshall C; Knipe D; Eyles EC; John A; Gunnell D; Higgins JPT
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2023 Sep; 181():65-75. PubMed ID: 37596160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Aligning text mining and machine learning algorithms with best practices for study selection in systematic literature reviews.
Popoff E; Besada M; Jansen JP; Cope S; Kanters S
Syst Rev; 2020 Dec; 9(1):293. PubMed ID: 33308292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Machine learning algorithms for systematic review: reducing workload in a preclinical review of animal studies and reducing human screening error.
Bannach-Brown A; Przybyła P; Thomas J; Rice ASC; Ananiadou S; Liao J; Macleod MR
Syst Rev; 2019 Jan; 8(1):23. PubMed ID: 30646959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis.
Marshall IJ; Wallace BC
Syst Rev; 2019 Jul; 8(1):163. PubMed ID: 31296265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The semi-automation of title and abstract screening: a retrospective exploration of ways to leverage Abstrackr's relevance predictions in systematic and rapid reviews.
Gates A; Gates M; Sebastianski M; Guitard S; Elliott SA; Hartling L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):139. PubMed ID: 32493228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Text mining to support abstract screening for knowledge syntheses: a semi-automated workflow.
Pham B; Jovanovic J; Bagheri E; Antony J; Ashoor H; Nguyen TT; Rios P; Robson R; Thomas SM; Watt J; Straus SE; Tricco AC
Syst Rev; 2021 May; 10(1):156. PubMed ID: 34039433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tools to support the automation of systematic reviews: a scoping review.
Khalil H; Ameen D; Zarnegar A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Apr; 144():22-42. PubMed ID: 34896236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automated screening of research studies for systematic reviews using study characteristics.
Tsafnat G; Glasziou P; Karystianis G; Coiera E
Syst Rev; 2018 Apr; 7(1):64. PubMed ID: 29695296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automation of literature screening using machine learning in medical evidence synthesis: a diagnostic test accuracy systematic review protocol.
Zhang Y; Liang S; Feng Y; Wang Q; Sun F; Chen S; Yang Y; He X; Zhu H; Pan H
Syst Rev; 2022 Jan; 11(1):11. PubMed ID: 35031074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Machine learning computational tools to assist the performance of systematic reviews: A mapping review.
Cierco Jimenez R; Lee T; Rosillo N; Cordova R; Cree IA; Gonzalez A; Indave Ruiz BI
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Dec; 22(1):322. PubMed ID: 36522637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance and usability of machine learning for screening in systematic reviews: a comparative evaluation of three tools.
Gates A; Guitard S; Pillay J; Elliott SA; Dyson MP; Newton AS; Hartling L
Syst Rev; 2019 Nov; 8(1):278. PubMed ID: 31727150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screening for in vitro systematic reviews: a comparison of screening methods and training of a machine learning classifier.
Wilson E; Cruz F; Maclean D; Ghanawi J; McCann SK; Brennan PM; Liao J; Sena ES; Macleod M
Clin Sci (Lond); 2023 Jan; 137(2):181-193. PubMed ID: 36630537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of a traditional systematic review approach with review-of-reviews and semi-automation as strategies to update the evidence.
Reddy SM; Patel S; Weyrich M; Fenton J; Viswanathan M
Syst Rev; 2020 Oct; 9(1):243. PubMed ID: 33076975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Technology-assisted title and abstract screening for systematic reviews: a retrospective evaluation of the Abstrackr machine learning tool.
Gates A; Johnson C; Hartling L
Syst Rev; 2018 Mar; 7(1):45. PubMed ID: 29530097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Machine learning reduced workload with minimal risk of missing studies: development and evaluation of a randomized controlled trial classifier for Cochrane Reviews.
Thomas J; McDonald S; Noel-Storr A; Shemilt I; Elliott J; Mavergames C; Marshall IJ
J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 May; 133():140-151. PubMed ID: 33171275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Making progress with the automation of systematic reviews: principles of the International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR).
Beller E; Clark J; Tsafnat G; Adams C; Diehl H; Lund H; Ouzzani M; Thayer K; Thomas J; Turner T; Xia J; Robinson K; Glasziou P;
Syst Rev; 2018 May; 7(1):77. PubMed ID: 29778096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An Automated Literature Review Tool (LiteRev) for Streamlining and Accelerating Research Using Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning: Descriptive Performance Evaluation Study.
Orel E; Ciglenecki I; Thiabaud A; Temerev A; Calmy A; Keiser O; Merzouki A
J Med Internet Res; 2023 Sep; 25():e39736. PubMed ID: 37713261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
