40 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38682527)
21. Evaluating the efficacy of artificial intelligence tools for the automation of systematic reviews in cancer research: A systematic review.
Yao X; Kumar MV; Su E; Flores Miranda A; Saha A; Sussman J
Cancer Epidemiol; 2024 Feb; 88():102511. PubMed ID: 38071872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A systematic review of machine learning and automation in burn wound evaluation: A promising but developing frontier.
Huang S; Dang J; Sheckter CC; Yenikomshian HA; Gillenwater J
Burns; 2021 Dec; 47(8):1691-1704. PubMed ID: 34419331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Inter-reviewer reliability of human literature reviewing and implications for the introduction of machine-assisted systematic reviews: a mixed-methods review.
Hanegraaf P; Wondimu A; Mosselman JJ; de Jong R; Abogunrin S; Queiros L; Lane M; Postma MJ; Boersma C; van der Schans J
BMJ Open; 2024 Mar; 14(3):e076912. PubMed ID: 38508610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning in Nutrition: A Systematic Review.
Theodore Armand TP; Nfor KA; Kim JI; Kim HC
Nutrients; 2024 Apr; 16(7):. PubMed ID: 38613106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Artificial intelligence and automation of systematic reviews in women's health.
Amezcua-Prieto C; Fernández-Luna JM; Huete-Guadix JF; Bueno-Cavanillas A; Khan KS
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Oct; 32(5):335-341. PubMed ID: 32516150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Machine learning in general practice: scoping review of administrative task support and automation.
Sørensen NL; Bemman B; Jensen MB; Moeslund TB; Thomsen JL
BMC Prim Care; 2023 Jan; 24(1):14. PubMed ID: 36641467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Data extraction methods for systematic review (semi)automation: A living review protocol.
Schmidt L; Olorisade BK; McGuinness LA; Thomas J; Higgins JPT
F1000Res; 2020; 9():210. PubMed ID: 32724560
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Toxic effects of nanomaterials for health applications: How automation can support a systematic review of the literature?
Halamoda-Kenzaoui B; Rolland E; Piovesan J; Puertas Gallardo A; Bremer-Hoffmann S
J Appl Toxicol; 2022 Jan; 42(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 34050552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Data-Driven Blood Glucose Pattern Classification and Anomalies Detection: Machine-Learning Applications in Type 1 Diabetes.
Woldaregay AZ; Årsand E; Botsis T; Albers D; Mamykina L; Hartvigsen G
J Med Internet Res; 2019 May; 21(5):e11030. PubMed ID: 31042157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Semi-Supervised Text Classification Framework: An Overview of Dengue Landscape Factors and Satellite Earth Observation.
Li Z; Gurgel H; Dessay N; Hu L; Xu L; Gong P
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Jun; 17(12):. PubMed ID: 32585932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Data-driven modeling and prediction of blood glucose dynamics: Machine learning applications in type 1 diabetes.
Woldaregay AZ; Årsand E; Walderhaug S; Albers D; Mamykina L; Botsis T; Hartvigsen G
Artif Intell Med; 2019 Jul; 98():109-134. PubMed ID: 31383477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Social media based surveillance systems for healthcare using machine learning: A systematic review.
Gupta A; Katarya R
J Biomed Inform; 2020 Aug; 108():103500. PubMed ID: 32622833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Machine learning in systematic reviews: Comparing automated text clustering with Lingo3G and human researcher categorization in a rapid review.
Muller AE; Ames HMR; Jardim PSJ; Rose CJ
Res Synth Methods; 2022 Mar; 13(2):229-241. PubMed ID: 34919321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Application of machine learning in predicting hospital readmissions: a scoping review of the literature.
Huang Y; Talwar A; Chatterjee S; Aparasu RR
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 May; 21(1):96. PubMed ID: 33952192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Screening Automation in Systematic Reviews: Analysis of Tools and Their Machine Learning Capabilities.
Sandner E; Gütl C; Jakovljevic I; Wagner A
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2024 Apr; 313():179-185. PubMed ID: 38682527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A narrative review of recent tools and innovations toward automating living systematic reviews and evidence syntheses.
Schmidt L; Sinyor M; Webb RT; Marshall C; Knipe D; Eyles EC; John A; Gunnell D; Higgins JPT
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2023 Sep; 181():65-75. PubMed ID: 37596160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Tools to support the automation of systematic reviews: a scoping review.
Khalil H; Ameen D; Zarnegar A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Apr; 144():22-42. PubMed ID: 34896236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Machine learning computational tools to assist the performance of systematic reviews: A mapping review.
Cierco Jimenez R; Lee T; Rosillo N; Cordova R; Cree IA; Gonzalez A; Indave Ruiz BI
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Dec; 22(1):322. PubMed ID: 36522637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of a traditional systematic review approach with review-of-reviews and semi-automation as strategies to update the evidence.
Reddy SM; Patel S; Weyrich M; Fenton J; Viswanathan M
Syst Rev; 2020 Oct; 9(1):243. PubMed ID: 33076975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [New Search]
