These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38682914)

  • 1. A context-based model to predict the intelligibility of sentences in non-stationary noises.
    van Schoonhoven J; Rhebergen KS; Dreschler WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2024 Apr; 155(4):2849-2859. PubMed ID: 38682914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A context-based approach to predict intelligibility of meaningful and nonsense words in interrupted noise: Model evaluation.
    van Schoonhoven J; Rhebergen KS; Dreschler WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Oct; 154(4):2476-2488. PubMed ID: 37862572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A context-based approach to predict speech intelligibility in interrupted noise: Model design.
    van Schoonhoven J; Rhebergen KS; Dreschler WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Feb; 151(2):1404. PubMed ID: 35232064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Information-bearing acoustic change outperforms duration in predicting intelligibility of full-spectrum and noise-vocoded sentences.
    Stilp CE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1518-29. PubMed ID: 24606287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
    Jørgensen S; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prediction of the influence of reverberation on binaural speech intelligibility in noise and in quiet.
    Rennies J; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2999-3012. PubMed ID: 22087928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of noise type on speech reception thresholds across four languages measured with matrix sentence tests.
    Hochmuth S; Kollmeier B; Brand T; Jürgens T
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():62-70. PubMed ID: 26097982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of noise suppression on intelligibility. II: An attempt to validate physical metrics.
    Hilkhuysen G; Gaubitch N; Brookes M; Huckvale M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):439-50. PubMed ID: 24437784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Application of an extended equalization-cancellation model to speech intelligibility with spatially distributed maskers.
    Wan R; Durlach NI; Colburn HS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):3678-90. PubMed ID: 21218900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can older adults enhance the intelligibility of their speech?
    Smiljanic R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Feb; 133(2):EL129-35. PubMed ID: 23363193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modelling speech intelligibility in adverse conditions.
    Jørgensen S; Dau T
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():343-51. PubMed ID: 23716240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of short-time intensity and envelope power for speech intelligibility and psychoacoustic masking.
    Biberger T; Ewert SD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):1098. PubMed ID: 28863616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The roles of fundamental frequency contours and sentence context in Mandarin Chinese speech intelligibility.
    Wang J; Shu H; Zhang L; Liu Z; Zhang Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):EL91-7. PubMed ID: 23862913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech intelligibility prediction based on modulation frequency-selective processing.
    Relaño-Iborra H; Dau T
    Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108610. PubMed ID: 36163219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Enhancing speech intelligibility: interactions among context, modality, speech style, and masker.
    Van Engen KJ; Phelps JE; Smiljanic R; Chandrasekaran B
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 57(5):1908-18. PubMed ID: 24687206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Extended speech intelligibility index for the prediction of the speech reception threshold in fluctuating noise.
    Rhebergen KS; Versfeld NJ; Dreschler WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Dec; 120(6):3988-97. PubMed ID: 17225425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spectral and temporal resolutions of information-bearing acoustic changes for understanding vocoded sentences.
    Stilp CE; Goupell MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):844-55. PubMed ID: 25698018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Masked speech perception across the adult lifespan: Impact of age and hearing impairment.
    Goossens T; Vercammen C; Wouters J; van Wieringen A
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():109-124. PubMed ID: 27845259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech reception by listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment: effects of continuous and interrupted noise.
    Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD; Perez ZD; Delhorne LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):342-59. PubMed ID: 20649229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Large-scale training to increase speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in novel noises.
    Chen J; Wang Y; Yoho SE; Wang D; Healy EW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2604. PubMed ID: 27250154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.