These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38683195)

  • 1. Nanopore and Illumina sequencing reveal different viral populations from human gut samples.
    Cook R; Telatin A; Hsieh SY; Newberry F; Tariq MA; Baker DJ; Carding SR; Adriaenssens EM
    Microb Genom; 2024 Apr; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 38683195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The gut virome in two indigenous populations from Malaysia.
    Lee CZ; Zoqratt MZHM; Phipps ME; Barr JJ; Lal SK; Ayub Q; Rahman S
    Sci Rep; 2022 Feb; 12(1):1824. PubMed ID: 35115615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-Read Nanopore-Based Sequencing of Anelloviruses.
    Anantharam R; Duchen D; Cox AL; Timp W; Thomas DL; Clipman SJ; Kandathil AJ
    Viruses; 2024 May; 16(5):. PubMed ID: 38793605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The long and short of it: benchmarking viromics using Illumina, Nanopore and PacBio sequencing technologies.
    Cook R; Brown N; Rihtman B; Michniewski S; Redgwell T; Clokie M; Stekel DJ; Chen Y; Scanlan DJ; Hobman JL; Nelson A; Jones MA; Smith D; Millard A
    Microb Genom; 2024 Feb; 10(2):. PubMed ID: 38376377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of PCR versus PCR-Free DNA Library Preparation for Characterising the Human Faecal Virome.
    Hsieh SY; Tariq MA; Telatin A; Ansorge R; Adriaenssens EM; Savva GM; Booth C; Wileman T; Hoyles L; Carding SR
    Viruses; 2021 Oct; 13(10):. PubMed ID: 34696523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Closing the gap: Oxford Nanopore Technologies R10 sequencing allows comparable results to Illumina sequencing for SNP-based outbreak investigation of bacterial pathogens.
    Bogaerts B; Van den Bossche A; Verhaegen B; Delbrassinne L; Mattheus W; Nouws S; Godfroid M; Hoffman S; Roosens NHC; De Keersmaecker SCJ; Vanneste K
    J Clin Microbiol; 2024 May; 62(5):e0157623. PubMed ID: 38441926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the accuracy of bacterial genome reconstruction with Oxford Nanopore R10.4.1 long-read-only sequencing.
    Sanderson ND; Hopkins KMV; Colpus M; Parker M; Lipworth S; Crook D; Stoesser N
    Microb Genom; 2024 May; 10(5):. PubMed ID: 38713194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exploring Semi-Quantitative Metagenomic Studies Using Oxford Nanopore Sequencing: A Computational and Experimental Protocol.
    Alili R; Belda E; Le P; Wirth T; Zucker JD; Prifti E; Clément K
    Genes (Basel); 2021 Sep; 12(10):. PubMed ID: 34680891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dancing the Nanopore limbo - Nanopore metagenomics from small DNA quantities for bacterial genome reconstruction.
    Simon SA; Schmidt K; Griesdorn L; Soares AR; Bornemann TLV; Probst AJ
    BMC Genomics; 2023 Dec; 24(1):727. PubMed ID: 38041056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Illumina and Oxford Nanopore Technology for genome analysis of Francisella tularensis, Bacillus anthracis, and Brucella suis.
    Linde J; Brangsch H; Hölzer M; Thomas C; Elschner MC; Melzer F; Tomaso H
    BMC Genomics; 2023 May; 24(1):258. PubMed ID: 37173617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Technical note: overcoming host contamination in bovine vaginal metagenomic samples with nanopore adaptive sequencing.
    Ong CT; Ross EM; Boe-Hansen GB; Turni C; Hayes BJ; Tabor AE
    J Anim Sci; 2022 Jan; 100(1):. PubMed ID: 34791313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating metagenomics and targeted approaches for diagnosis and surveillance of viruses.
    Buddle S; Forrest L; Akinsuyi N; Martin Bernal LM; Brooks T; Venturini C; Miller C; Brown JR; Storey N; Atkinson L; Best T; Roy S; Goldsworthy S; Castellano S; Simmonds P; Harvala H; Golubchik T; Williams R; Breuer J; Morfopoulou S; Torres Montaguth OE
    Genome Med; 2024 Sep; 16(1):111. PubMed ID: 39252069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of De Novo Assembly Strategies for Bacterial Genomes.
    Zhang P; Jiang D; Wang Y; Yao X; Luo Y; Yang Z
    Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Jul; 22(14):. PubMed ID: 34299288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using Nanopore Sequencing to Obtain Complete Bacterial Genomes from Saliva Samples.
    Baker JL
    mSystems; 2022 Oct; 7(5):e0049122. PubMed ID: 35993719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assembly methods for nanopore-based metagenomic sequencing: a comparative study.
    Latorre-Pérez A; Villalba-Bermell P; Pascual J; Vilanova C
    Sci Rep; 2020 Aug; 10(1):13588. PubMed ID: 32788623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Complete, closed bacterial genomes from microbiomes using nanopore sequencing.
    Moss EL; Maghini DG; Bhatt AS
    Nat Biotechnol; 2020 Jun; 38(6):701-707. PubMed ID: 32042169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Illumina versus Nanopore 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing of the Human Nasal Microbiota.
    Heikema AP; Horst-Kreft D; Boers SA; Jansen R; Hiltemann SD; de Koning W; Kraaij R; de Ridder MAJ; van Houten CB; Bont LJ; Stubbs AP; Hays JP
    Genes (Basel); 2020 Sep; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 32967250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Comparison of Structural Variant Calling from Short-Read and Nanopore-Based Whole-Genome Sequencing Using Optical Genome Mapping as a Benchmark.
    Pei Y; Tanguy M; Giess A; Dixit A; Wilson LC; Gibbons RJ; Twigg SRF; Elgar G; Wilkie AOM
    Genes (Basel); 2024 Jul; 15(7):. PubMed ID: 39062704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of long-read sequencing technologies in the hybrid assembly of complex bacterial genomes.
    De Maio N; Shaw LP; Hubbard A; George S; Sanderson ND; Swann J; Wick R; AbuOun M; Stubberfield E; Hoosdally SJ; Crook DW; Peto TEA; Sheppard AE; Bailey MJ; Read DS; Anjum MF; Walker AS; Stoesser N; On Behalf Of The Rehab Consortium
    Microb Genom; 2019 Sep; 5(9):. PubMed ID: 31483244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of R9.4.1/Kit10 and R10/Kit12 Oxford Nanopore flowcells and chemistries in bacterial genome reconstruction.
    Sanderson ND; Kapel N; Rodger G; Webster H; Lipworth S; Street TL; Peto T; Crook D; Stoesser N
    Microb Genom; 2023 Jan; 9(1):. PubMed ID: 36748454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.