These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38683797)

  • 21. Consideration of multiple load cases is critical in modelling orthotropic bone adaptation in the femur.
    Geraldes DM; Modenese L; Phillips AT
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2016 Oct; 15(5):1029-42. PubMed ID: 26578078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cortical bone mapping improves finite element strain prediction accuracy at the proximal femur.
    Schileo E; Pitocchi J; Falcinelli C; Taddei F
    Bone; 2020 Jul; 136():115348. PubMed ID: 32240847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Fracture prediction for the proximal femur using finite element models: Part II--Nonlinear analysis.
    Lotz JC; Cheal EJ; Hayes WC
    J Biomech Eng; 1991 Nov; 113(4):361-5. PubMed ID: 1762431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. In-vivo assessment of femoral bone strength using Finite Element Analysis (FEA) based on routine MDCT imaging: a preliminary study on patients with vertebral fractures.
    Liebl H; Garcia EG; Holzner F; Noel PB; Burgkart R; Rummeny EJ; Baum T; Bauer JS
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0116907. PubMed ID: 25723187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Prediction of damage formation in hip arthroplasties by finite element analysis using computed tomography images.
    Abdullah AH; Todo M; Nakashima Y
    Med Eng Phys; 2017 Jun; 44():8-15. PubMed ID: 28373012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Incorporating in vivo fall assessments in the simulation of femoral fractures with finite element models.
    van der Zijden AM; Janssen D; Verdonschot N; Groen BE; Nienhuis B; Weerdesteyn V; Tanck E
    Med Eng Phys; 2015 Jun; 37(6):593-8. PubMed ID: 25892569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of non-invasive assessments of strength of the proximal femur.
    Johannesdottir F; Thrall E; Muller J; Keaveny TM; Kopperdahl DL; Bouxsein ML
    Bone; 2017 Dec; 105():93-102. PubMed ID: 28739416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dynamic finite element analysis of impulsive stress waves propagating from distal end of femur.
    Sarai T; Inoue T; Fujiwara K; Kuramoto K
    Acta Med Okayama; 2012; 66(5):409-15. PubMed ID: 23093059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Numerical modelling of hip fracture patterns in human femur.
    Marco M; Giner E; Caeiro-Rey JR; Miguélez MH; Larraínzar-Garijo R
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 May; 173():67-75. PubMed ID: 31046997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Prediction of proximal femur strength using a CT-based nonlinear finite element method: differences in predicted fracture load and site with changing load and boundary conditions.
    Bessho M; Ohnishi I; Matsumoto T; Ohashi S; Matsuyama J; Tobita K; Kaneko M; Nakamura K
    Bone; 2009 Aug; 45(2):226-31. PubMed ID: 19398043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Examination of femoral-neck structure using finite element model and bone mineral density using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Qian JG; Song YW; Tang X; Zhang S
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Jan; 24(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 18980785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Strains caused by daily loading might be responsible for delayed healing of an incomplete atypical femoral fracture.
    Gustafsson A; Schilcher J; Grassi L; Aspenberg P; Isaksson H
    Bone; 2016 Jul; 88():125-130. PubMed ID: 27113528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Structural determinants of hip fracture in elderly women: re-analysis of the data from the EPIDOS study.
    Szulc P; Duboeuf F; Schott AM; Dargent-Molina P; Meunier PJ; Delmas PD
    Osteoporos Int; 2006 Feb; 17(2):231-6. PubMed ID: 15983728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Lower hip bone mass and proximal femur fractures in elderly patients: more valuable than lumbar vertebrae bone mineral density.
    Shin HK; Choi JY; Lee J; Jeong HJ; Kim E; Park SJ; Jeon B; Lim JJ
    Orthopedics; 2010 Dec; 33(12):875. PubMed ID: 21162517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reduction in proximal femoral strength in patients with acute spinal cord injury.
    Edwards WB; Schnitzer TJ; Troy KL
    J Bone Miner Res; 2014 Sep; 29(9):2074-9. PubMed ID: 24677293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Physical activity induced adaptation can increase proximal femur strength under loading from a fall onto the greater trochanter.
    Fuchs RK; Carballido-Gamio J; Keyak JH; Kersh ME; Warden SJ
    Bone; 2021 Nov; 152():116090. PubMed ID: 34175500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Microstructural failure mechanisms in the human proximal femur for sideways fall loading.
    Nawathe S; Akhlaghpour H; Bouxsein ML; Keaveny TM
    J Bone Miner Res; 2014 Feb; 29(2):507-15. PubMed ID: 23832419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of finite element model loading condition on fracture risk assessment in men and women: the AGES-Reykjavik study.
    Keyak JH; Sigurdsson S; Karlsdottir GS; Oskarsdottir D; Sigmarsdottir A; Kornak J; Harris TB; Sigurdsson G; Jonsson BY; Siggeirsdottir K; Eiriksdottir G; Gudnason V; Lang TF
    Bone; 2013 Nov; 57(1):18-29. PubMed ID: 23907032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Impact loading history modulates hip fracture load and location: A finite element simulation study of the proximal femur in female athletes.
    Abe S; Narra N; Nikander R; Hyttinen J; Kouhia R; Sievänen H
    J Biomech; 2018 Jul; 76():136-143. PubMed ID: 29921524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Relationships between femoral strength evaluated by nonlinear finite element analysis and BMD, material distribution and geometric morphology.
    Gong H; Zhang M; Fan Y; Kwok WL; Leung PC
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2012 Jul; 40(7):1575-85. PubMed ID: 22258889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.