These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3868599)

  • 1. [Significance of centric mandibular position in the cephalometric planning of corrective osteotomies].
    Spitzer WJ
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1985 Aug; 40(8):856-9. PubMed ID: 3868599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Changes in mandibular movement before and after treatment of malocclusion. Standardized analysis of the lateral x-ray cephalogram in orthodontic and surgical treatment cases].
    Yoshino S
    Shikwa Gakuho; 1983 Aug; 83(8):1055-97. PubMed ID: 6582601
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Treatment of Class II division 2 malocclusion with combined bilateral sagittal split osteotomy and total subapical osteotomy.
    Eliades T; Hegdvedt AK; Larsen PE; Herpy AK
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(3):213-22. PubMed ID: 7814926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Clinical, cephalometric and therapeutic aspects of a short face].
    Plenier V; Delaire J
    Ann Chir Plast Esthet; 1985; 30(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 2418750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The importance of determination of jaw position in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning for adult patients.
    Chang FH; Chen KC; Shiau YY
    Dent Clin North Am; 1997 Jan; 41(1):49-66. PubMed ID: 9023062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An innovative method for accurate positioning of the proximal segment in sagittal split osteotomies.
    Burye MT; Stella JP
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2000; 15(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 11307224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Surgical visual treatment objective: cephalometric planning in the treatment of dysgnathia of facial complex].
    Iannetti G; Cascone P; Silvestri A; Martucci E; Chimenti C
    Mondo Ortod; 1981; 6(6):60-75. PubMed ID: 6962359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Severe Class II malocclusion with facial asymmetry treated with intraoral vertico-sagittal ramus osteotomy and LeFort I osteotomy.
    Kuroda S; Murakami K; Morishige Y; Takano-Yamamoto T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):809-19. PubMed ID: 19524842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cephalometric analysis: comparisons between maximum intercuspation and centric relation.
    Williamson EH; Caves SA; Edenfield RJ; Morse PK
    Am J Orthod; 1978 Dec; 74(6):672-7. PubMed ID: 281875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anterior segmental mandibular osteotomies for the correction of facial-skeletal deformities.
    Bloomquist DS
    Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2007 Aug; 19(3):369-79, vi. PubMed ID: 18088891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Class II, division 1, malocclusion, subdivision left, with a severe anteroposterior discrepancy.
    Neugent RK
    Orthod Rev; 1993; 7(5):12-25. PubMed ID: 8008449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Early modification of the mandibular position, its effect on growth, its therapeutic use].
    Deffez JP; Fellus P
    Actual Odontostomatol (Paris); 1977 Jun; (118):207-20. PubMed ID: 920330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Results after mandibular advancement surgery: an analysis of 87 cases.
    Schendel SA; Epker BN
    J Oral Surg; 1980 Apr; 38(4):265-82. PubMed ID: 6928455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Effect of mandibular dislocation on cephalometric analysis in orthodontics].
    Schmid W; Mongini F
    Mondo Ortod; 1982; 7(3):25-9. PubMed ID: 6962928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of the change in mandibular position on the soft tissue facial pattern in three dimensions.
    Loh KW
    Singapore Dent J; 1983 May; 8(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 6581537
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Method to verify the accuracy of model surgery and prediction tracing.
    Omura T; Glickman RS; Super S
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1996; 11(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 9456630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A cephalometric evaluation of the pharyngeal airway space in patients with mandibular retrognathia and prognathia, and normal subjects.
    Muto T; Yamazaki A; Takeda S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 37(3):228-31. PubMed ID: 18296029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of combined maxillary and mandibular repositioning and of soft tissue prediction in relation to maxillary antero-superior repositioning combined with mandibular set back A computerized cephalometric evaluation of the immediate postsurgical outcome using the TIOPS planning system.
    Donatsky O; Bjørn-Jørgensen J; Hermund NU; Nielsen H; Holmqvist-Larsen M; Nerder PH
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 37(5):279-84. PubMed ID: 19188076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The relationship between presurgical hyoid bone position and 1-year postsurgical change in mandibular position following mandibular advancement surgery.
    Tan JL; Marshall SD; Kallal RH; Monahan R; Jacobson RS
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(4):263-8. PubMed ID: 9082015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of the relationship of centric relation and centric occlusion by the mandibular kinesiograph.
    Maruyama T; Miyauchi S; Umekoji E; Simoosa T
    J Osaka Univ Dent Sch; 1980 Dec; 20():173-8. PubMed ID: 6940982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.