These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3868782)

  • 21. Effect of pre- and postoperative bleaching on marginal leakage of amalgam and composite restorations.
    Ulukapi H; Benderli Y; Ulukapi I
    Quintessence Int; 2003; 34(7):505-8. PubMed ID: 12946068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Marginal adaptation of Class 5 composite restorations: retention grooves versus enamel and dentin bonding.
    Farid MR; Gomaa HM
    Egypt Dent J; 1995 Jul; 41(3):1271-5. PubMed ID: 9497668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of three filling techniques on marginal leakage around Class II composite resin restorations in vitro.
    Koenigsberg S; Fuks A; Grajower R
    Quintessence Int; 1989 Feb; 20(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 2762501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Factors and prevention of pulp irritation by adhesive composite resin restorations.
    Fusayama T
    Quintessence Int; 1987 Sep; 18(9):633-41. PubMed ID: 3478748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Marginal leakage of composite resins following mechanical wear.
    Hembree JH; Taylor TJ
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1983 Apr; 63(2):32-5. PubMed ID: 6578384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Marginal leakage of Class II composite resin restorations: Part I].
    Nakano Y; Ohba H; Nitoh A; Hidaka T; Murasawa H; Takamizu M; Kohno A
    Tsurumi Shigaku; 1987 Sep; 13(3):335-42. PubMed ID: 3506359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Microleakage of a new dental adhesive comparing microfilled and hybrid resin composites.
    Fitchie JG; Puckett AD; Reeves GW; Hembree JH
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Jul; 26(7):505-10. PubMed ID: 8935037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of acidic primers in microleakage of Class 5 composite resin restorations.
    Gordan VV; Vargas MA; Cobb DS; Denehy GE
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(5):244-9. PubMed ID: 9863445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. In vitro marginal leakage evaluation of a posterior composite resin.
    Hembree JH; Williams JI
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1981 Apr; 61(2):11-3. PubMed ID: 7031369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An in vitro study of microleakage of occlusal composite restorations polymerized by a conventional curing light and a PAC curing light.
    Stritikus J; Owens B
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 11314147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reducing microleakage in composite resin restorations: an in vitro study.
    Unlu N; Krakaya S; Ozer F; Say EC
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2003 Dec; 11(4):171-5. PubMed ID: 14737794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of cyclical lateral forces on microleakage in cervical resin composite restorations.
    Fruits TJ; VanBrunt CL; Khajotia SS; Duncanson MG
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Mar; 33(3):205-12. PubMed ID: 11921769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. In vitro microleakage of etched and rebonded Class 5 composite resin restorations.
    Munro GA; Hilton TJ; Hermesch CB
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(5):203-8. PubMed ID: 9484173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of finishing method on the microleakage of Class V microfilled composite resin restorations.
    Brackett WW; Girdwood BJ
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1999 Apr; 79(2):24-5. PubMed ID: 10726577
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Bacterial permeability of amalgam and composite restorations].
    Terranova P; Maggio G; Sammartino R; Cavallaro C; Torrisi V
    Dent Cadmos; 1988 Sep; 56(14):72-4, 77-8, 81-3. PubMed ID: 3255630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A clinical study of the "open sandwich" technique in pediatric dental practice.
    Cannon ML
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 12762613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Class 5 composite resin restorations: margin configurations and the distance from the CEJ.
    Hall LH; Cochran MA; Swartz ML
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(6):246-50. PubMed ID: 8152997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Marginal leakage of combinations of glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations.
    Sarne S; Mante MO; Mante FK
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 9238879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid: an alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding.
    Hannig M; Reinhardt KJ; Bott B
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):172-80. PubMed ID: 10530279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of cavosurface margin configuration of Class V cavity preparations on microleakage of composite resin restorations.
    Bagheri M; Ghavamnasiri M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Feb; 9(2):122-9. PubMed ID: 18264534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.