These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38690156)

  • 1. The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Orthodontic Adult Patients' Characteristics and Decision on Orthodontic Appliance.
    Kuo YY; Fang JC; Wang IK; Huang CS; Chen HL; Yen TH
    J Multidiscip Healthc; 2024; 17():1847-1855. PubMed ID: 38690156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characteristics and Dental Indices of Orthodontic Patients Using Aligners or Brackets.
    Liao TH; Fang JC; Wang IK; Huang CS; Chen HL; Yen TH
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 May; 19(11):. PubMed ID: 35682154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Has the COVID-19 Pandemic Affected Orthodontists' Interest in Various Orthodontic Appliances?
    Eğlenen MN; Yavan MA
    Turk J Orthod; 2023 Dec; 36(4):216-223. PubMed ID: 38164005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Braces versus Invisalign®: gingival parameters and patients' satisfaction during treatment: a cross-sectional study.
    Azaripour A; Weusmann J; Mahmoodi B; Peppas D; Gerhold-Ay A; Van Noorden CJ; Willershausen B
    BMC Oral Health; 2015 Jun; 15():69. PubMed ID: 26104387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of active self-ligating brackets and conventional pre-adjusted brackets.
    Hamilton R; Goonewardene MS; Murray K
    Aust Orthod J; 2008 Nov; 24(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 19113074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Treatment time, outcome, and anchorage loss comparisons of self-ligating and conventional brackets.
    Machibya FM; Bao X; Zhao L; Hu M
    Angle Orthod; 2013 Mar; 83(2):280-5. PubMed ID: 22900592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The relationship between the ICON index and the dental and aesthetic components of the IOTN index.
    Borzabadi-Farahani A; Borzabadi-Farahani A; Eslamipour F
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 20209176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Orthodontic treatment efficiency with self-ligating and conventional edgewise twin brackets: a prospective randomized clinical trial.
    Johansson K; Lundström F
    Angle Orthod; 2012 Sep; 82(5):929-34. PubMed ID: 22397386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative assessment of dental and basal arch dimensions of passive and active self-ligating versus conventional appliances : A randomized clinical trial.
    Alabdullah MM; Burhan AS; Nabawia A; Nawaya F; Saltaji H
    J Orofac Orthop; 2023 Apr; 84(Suppl 2):74-83. PubMed ID: 35788397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficiency of compensatory orthodontic treatment of mild Class III malocclusion with two different bracket systems.
    Aragón MLC; Bichara LM; Flores-Mir C; Almeida G; Normando D
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2017; 22(6):49-55. PubMed ID: 29364379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mandibular dental arch changes associated with treatment of crowding using self-ligating and conventional brackets.
    Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Makou M; Eliades T
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):248-53. PubMed ID: 19959610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do orthodontic treatments using fixed appliances and clear aligner achieve comparable quality of occlusal contacts?
    Al-Dboush RE; Al-Zawawi E; El-Bialy T
    Evid Based Dent; 2022 Dec; 23(4):160-161. PubMed ID: 36526845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of white spot lesion formation between a self-ligating bracket and a conventional preadjusted straight wire bracket.
    Polat Ö; Gökçelik A; Arman A; Arhun N
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):e46-50. PubMed ID: 19641768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. FIXED OR REMOVABLE APPLIANCE FOR EARLY ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT OF FUNCTIONAL ANTERIOR CROSSBITE.
    Wiedel AP
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2015; (238):10-72. PubMed ID: 26939312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of positioning three types of self-ligating brackets compared with a conventionally ligating bracket.
    Birdsall J; Hunt NP; Sabbah W; Moseley HC
    J Orthod; 2012 Mar; 39(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 22433325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The time needed to refit an orthodontic wire: influence of the attachments.
    Le Gall M; Bachet C; Dameron C
    Int Orthod; 2014 Dec; 12(4):431-42. PubMed ID: 25457393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lingual orthodontic treatment duration: performance of two different completely customized multi-bracket appliances (Incognito and WIN) in groups with different treatment complexities.
    Knösel M; Klang E; Helms HJ; Wiechmann D
    Head Face Med; 2014 Nov; 10():46. PubMed ID: 25361639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Comparison of Three Orthodontic Treatment Indices with Regard to Angle Classification.
    Kaygisiz E; Uzuner FD; Taner L
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 26950821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Air-powder polishing on self-ligating brackets after clinical use: effects on debris levels.
    Aragón ML; Lima LS; Normando D
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2016; 21(5):90-94. PubMed ID: 27901234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of fixed orthodontic treatment using conventional versus metal-injection molding brackets on salivary nickel and chromium levels: a double-blind randomized clinical trial.
    Amini F; Harandi S; Mollaei M; Rakhshan V
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Oct; 37(5):522-30. PubMed ID: 25518997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.