146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38690459)
1. Assessing the Accuracy of Lateral Cephalogram in Quantifying Three-Dimensional Pharyngeal Airway Morphology Compared to Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.
Ashique Abdulhameed S; Riyaz Ss MA; Almutairy M; Khan N S; Jayakumar S; Gaonkar P
Cureus; 2024 Mar; 16(3):e57301. PubMed ID: 38690459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of Pharyngeal Airway Using Lateral Cephalogram vs CBCT Images: A Cross-sectional Retrospective Study.
Bronoosh P; Khojastepour L
Open Dent J; 2015; 9():263-6. PubMed ID: 26464593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of Craniofacial Morphology on Pharyngeal Airway Volume Measured Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT)-A Retrospective Pilot Study.
Diwakar R; Kochhar AS; Gupta H; Kaur H; Sidhu MS; Skountrianos H; Singh G; Tepedino M
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 May; 18(9):. PubMed ID: 34068732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. No correlation between two-dimensional measurements and three-dimensional configuration of the pharyngeal upper airway space in cone-beam computed tomography.
Abé-Nickler MD; Pörtner S; Sieg P; Hakim SG
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Mar; 45(3):371-376. PubMed ID: 28187974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Study of pharyngeal airway morphology with CBCT: Benefits of four premolar extraction orthodontic treatments.
Fang MR; Yan XZ; Ni JL; Gu YG; Meng L; Yuan LC; Cai HY; Wang LR; Qin JW; Cai Q; Zhang Y; Guo SY
Niger J Clin Pract; 2022 Dec; 25(12):1955-1962. PubMed ID: 36537450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. From 2D to 3D: an algorithm to derive normal values for 3-dimensional computerized assessment.
Gribel BF; Gribel MN; Manzi FR; Brooks SL; McNamara JA
Angle Orthod; 2011 Jan; 81(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 20936948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of pharyngeal airway space amongst different skeletal patterns.
Alves M; Franzotti ES; Baratieri C; Nunes LK; Nojima LI; Ruellas AC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 41(7):814-9. PubMed ID: 22365893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative study of cephalometric measurements using 3 imaging modalities.
Wen J; Liu S; Ye X; Xie X; Li J; Li H; Mei L
J Am Dent Assoc; 2017 Dec; 148(12):913-921. PubMed ID: 29042006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of pharyngeal airway changes on plain radiography and cone-beam computed tomography after orthognathic surgery.
Sears CR; Miller AJ; Chang MK; Huang JC; Lee JS
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 69(11):e385-94. PubMed ID: 21778015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of pharyngeal airway volume in different skeletal facial patterns using cone beam computed tomography.
Shokri A; Miresmaeili A; Ahmadi A; Amini P; Falah-Kooshki S
J Clin Exp Dent; 2018 Oct; 10(10):e1017-e1028. PubMed ID: 30386509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Exploring a new method for superimposition of pre-treatment and post-treatment mandibular digital dental casts in adults].
Dai FF; Liu Y; Xu TM; Chen G
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Apr; 50(2):271-278. PubMed ID: 29643526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparative study of the pharyngeal airway space, measured with cone beam computed tomography, between patients with different craniofacial morphologies.
Dalmau E; Zamora N; Tarazona B; Gandia JL; Paredes V
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 43(8):1438-46. PubMed ID: 26189145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of reliability of lateral cephalogram and computed tomography for assessment of airway space.
Kaur S; Rai S; Kaur M
Niger J Clin Pract; 2014; 17(5):629-36. PubMed ID: 25244276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Deformable registration of lateral cephalogram and cone-beam computed tomography image.
Zhang Y; Qin H; Li P; Pei Y; Guo Y; Xu T; Zha H
Med Phys; 2021 Nov; 48(11):6901-6915. PubMed ID: 34496039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the Pharyngeal Airway Volume Between Patients With Ectodermal Dysplasia and Unaffected Controls: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study.
Bous RM; Shah P; Elnaghy R; Elshebiny T; Valiathan M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Sep; 78(9):1629.e1-1629.e9. PubMed ID: 32417317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cone-beam evaluation of pharyngeal airway space in adult skeletal Class II patients with different condylar positions.
Xu J; Sun R; Wang L; Hu X
Angle Orthod; 2019 Mar; 89(2):312-316. PubMed ID: 30457352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of Twin-Block with an expanding device on the upper airway in growing children with skeletal class II malocclusion-a retrospective study based on the consistency of three-dimensional and two-dimensional data.
Mao F; Lu C; Liu N; Liu Z; Zhang Y; Qi H; Hu M
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Dec; 28(1):4. PubMed ID: 38123880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correlation between the three-dimensional maxillomandibular complex parameters and pharyngeal airway dimensions in different sagittal and vertical malocclusions.
Al-Somairi MAA; Liu Y; Almashraq AA; Almaqrami BS; Alshoaibi LH; Alyafrusee ES; Al-Tayar B; An X; Alhammadi MS
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2023 Feb; 52(3):20220346. PubMed ID: 36695712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms.
Hariharan A; Diwakar NR; Jayanthi K; Hema HM; Deepukrishna S; Ghaste SR
Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography definition of the anatomical subregions of the upper airway: a validation study.
Guijarro-Martínez R; Swennen GR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Sep; 42(9):1140-9. PubMed ID: 23623785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
