These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38690819)
1. Minimally invasive extractions with physics forceps - clinical evaluation and comparison. Chenchev LI; Ivanova VV; Chenchev IL; Daskalov HI Folia Med (Plovdiv); 2024 Apr; 66(2):235-242. PubMed ID: 38690819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative evaluation of efficacy of physics forcep and conventional forceps for extraction of maxillary molars. Bhosale TN; Bhate K; Samuel S; Jacob G Minerva Dent Oral Sci; 2024 Apr; 73(2):75-80. PubMed ID: 37326503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison Between Physics and Conventional Forceps in Simple Dental Extraction. El-Kenawy MH; Ahmed WM J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2015 Dec; 14(4):949-55. PubMed ID: 26604469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Physics Forceps versus Conventional Forceps in Orthodontic Extractions: A Prospective Randomized Split Mouth Study. Patel HS; Managutti AM; Menat S; Agarwal A; Shah D; Patel J J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 Jul; 10(7):ZC41-5. PubMed ID: 27630951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimally-invasive tooth extraction: doorknobs and strings revisited! Saund D; Dietrich T Dent Update; 2013 May; 40(4):325-6, 328-30. PubMed ID: 23829016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of Physics Forceps in Atraumatic Orthodontic Extractions of Bilateral Premolars: A Randomized Control Clinical Study. Kapila S; Kaur T; Bhullar RS; Sandhu A; Dhawan A; Kaur A J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2020 Sep; 19(3):347-354. PubMed ID: 32801526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Split-mouth comparison of physics forceps and extraction forceps in orthodontic extraction of upper premolars. Hariharan S; Narayanan V; Soh CL Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 52(10):e137-40. PubMed ID: 25015020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Beak and bumper - Physics forceps: Evaluation of new technique in extraction. Raghu K; Selvakumar SR; Muthukumar R; Thangavelu A; Sathyanarayanan R; Mani M; Balasubramaniam M Indian J Dent Res; 2020; 31(1):4-13. PubMed ID: 32246674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficacy of the Atraumatic Physics Forceps Over Conventional Extraction Forceps in Extraction of Tooth-Does it Offer an Alternative in All Types of Extraction or Only can be Used in Few Selected Types of Extraction: A Comparative Study. Laskar S; Singh M; Suman A; Sahu S; Mishra BP; Sahoo A J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2022 Jul; 14(Suppl 1):S859-S862. PubMed ID: 36110718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [The determination of the tooth-destroying loading while clamping the forceps during tooth removal]. Lisenkov VV; Demidova II Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1998; 77(6):12-4. PubMed ID: 10067407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measurement of tooth extraction forces in upper incisors. Ahel V; Brekalo I; Ahel J; Brumini G Coll Antropol; 2006 Mar; 30(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 16617572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The retrieval of a surgical blade broken within the alveolar bone during minimally traumatic tooth extraction. Koshy E; Annamma LM; George BT; Menezes GA BMJ Case Rep; 2021 Jan; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 33504539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The improved oval forceps suture-guiding method for minimally invasive Achilles tendon repair. Liu Y; Lin L; Lin C; Weng Q; Hong J Injury; 2018 Jun; 49(6):1228-1232. PubMed ID: 29731123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The routine extraction of teeth with forceps and elevators. Kay LW; Killey HC Dent Update; 1975; 2(3):133-4, 37-40, 42. PubMed ID: 1073825 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]