These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38691258)

  • 1. A systematic review of factors impacting intraoral scanning accuracy in implant dentistry with emphasis on scan bodies.
    Gehrke P; Rashidpour M; Sader R; Weigl P
    Int J Implant Dent; 2024 May; 10(1):20. PubMed ID: 38691258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characteristics of intraoral scan bodies and their influence on impression accuracy: A systematic review.
    Pachiou A; Zervou E; Tsirogiannis P; Sykaras N; Tortopidis D; Kourtis S
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2023 Dec; 35(8):1205-1217. PubMed ID: 37381677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intraoral scan bodies in implant dentistry: A systematic review.
    Mizumoto RM; Yilmaz B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):343-352. PubMed ID: 29627211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intraoral digital implant scans: Parameters to improve accuracy.
    Revilla-León M; Lanis A; Yilmaz B; Kois JC; Gallucci GO
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; 32(S2):150-164. PubMed ID: 37586762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The accuracy of different dental impression techniques for implant-supported dental prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Flügge T; van der Meer WJ; Gonzalez BG; Vach K; Wismeijer D; Wang P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():374-392. PubMed ID: 30328182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of implant scan body design (height, diameter, geometry, material, and retention system) on intraoral scanning accuracy: A systematic review.
    Gómez-Polo M; Donmez MB; Çakmak G; Yilmaz B; Revilla-León M
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; 32(S2):165-180. PubMed ID: 37771200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of edentulous full-arch implant impression: An in vitro comparison between conventional impression, intraoral scan with and without splinting, and photogrammetry.
    Cheng J; Zhang H; Liu H; Li J; Wang HL; Tao X
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 May; 35(5):560-572. PubMed ID: 38421115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of full-arch digital implant impressions taken using intraoral scanners and related variables: A systematic review.
    Zhang YJ; Shi JY; Qian SJ; Qiao SC; Lai HC
    Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2021 May; 14(2):157-179. PubMed ID: 34006079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of different digital scanning techniques and scan bodies for complete-arch implant-supported prostheses.
    Mizumoto RM; Yilmaz B; McGlumphy EA; Seidt J; Johnston WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 31040026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital Impressions in Implant Dentistry: A Literature Review.
    Marques S; Ribeiro P; Falcão C; Lemos BF; Ríos-Carrasco B; Ríos-Santos JV; Herrero-Climent M
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jan; 18(3):. PubMed ID: 33498902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Novel complete-arch pillar system (CAPS) to register implant position and maxillomandibular relationship in one single visit.
    Nuytens P; Grande F; D'haese R; Salameh Z; Lepidi L
    J Dent; 2024 Apr; 143():104885. PubMed ID: 38346663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Virtual implant scan body switch by using computer-aided design programs avoiding the need of obtaining a new intraoral implant digital scan: A novel protocol.
    Alonso Pérez-Barquero J; García-Sala Bonmatí F; de Fernández Estevan L; Guinot Barona C; Maneiro Lojo J; Revilla-León M
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 Feb; 36(2):278-283. PubMed ID: 37681471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Additively manufactured devices with varying designs and sizes for acquiring initial intraoral implant scans.
    Guirao S; Llansana F; Button H; Yilmaz B; Kois JC; Revilla-León M
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; 32(S2):181-185. PubMed ID: 37585338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of photogrammetry, intraoral scanning, and conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation: an in vitro comparative study.
    Ma B; Yue X; Sun Y; Peng L; Geng W
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Dec; 21(1):636. PubMed ID: 34893053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The direct digital workflow in fixed implant prosthodontics: a narrative review.
    Michelinakis G; Apostolakis D; Kamposiora P; Papavasiliou G; Özcan M
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Jan; 21(1):37. PubMed ID: 33478459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Techniques to improve the accuracy of complete arch implant intraoral digital scans: A systematic review.
    Paratelli A; Vania S; Gómez-Polo C; Ortega R; Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jun; 129(6):844-854. PubMed ID: 34756427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors that influence the accuracy of intraoral scanning of total edentulous arches rehabilitated with multiple implants: A systematic review.
    Carneiro Pereira AL; Souza Curinga MR; Melo Segundo HV; da Fonte Porto Carreiro A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jun; 129(6):855-862. PubMed ID: 34656307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of the implant scan body bevel location, implant angulation and position on intraoral scanning accuracy: An in vitro study.
    Gómez-Polo M; Álvarez F; Ortega R; Gómez-Polo C; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Revilla-León M
    J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104122. PubMed ID: 35395345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of different artificial landmarks and scanning patterns on the complete-arch implant intraoral digital scans.
    Kanjanasavitree P; Thammajaruk P; Guazzato M
    J Dent; 2022 Oct; 125():104266. PubMed ID: 35995084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vivo trueness and precision of full-arch implant scans using intraoral scanners with three different acquisition protocols.
    Nedelcu R; Olsson P; Thulin M; Nyström I; Thor A
    J Dent; 2023 Jan; 128():104308. PubMed ID: 36481688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.