These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38691435)

  • 21. Image Quality Assessment Using Contrastive Learning.
    Madhusudana PC; Birkbeck N; Wang Y; Adsumilli B; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():4149-4161. PubMed ID: 35700254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Waterloo Exploration Database: New Challenges for Image Quality Assessment Models.
    Kede Ma ; Zhengfang Duanmu ; Qingbo Wu ; Zhou Wang ; Hongwei Yong ; Hongliang Li ; Lei Zhang
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2017 Feb; 26(2):1004-1016. PubMed ID: 27893392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Deep learning-driven multi-view multi-task image quality assessment method for chest CT image.
    Su J; Li M; Lin Y; Xiong L; Yuan C; Zhou Z; Yan K
    Biomed Eng Online; 2023 Dec; 22(1):117. PubMed ID: 38057850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cubemap-Based Perception-Driven Blind Quality Assessment for 360-degree Images.
    Jiang H; Jiang G; Yu M; Zhang Y; Yang Y; Peng Z; Chen F; Zhang Q
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2021; 30():2364-2377. PubMed ID: 33481711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Objective Quality Assessment and Perceptual Compression of Screen Content Images.
    Wang S; Gu K; Zeng K; Wang Z; Lin W
    IEEE Comput Graph Appl; 2018 Jan; 38(1):47-58. PubMed ID: 27244723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Blind Image Quality Assessment for Pathological Microscopic Image Under Screen and Immersion Scenarios.
    Guo Y; Hu M; Min X; Wang Y; Dai M; Zhai G; Zhang XP; Yang X
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2023 Nov; 42(11):3295-3306. PubMed ID: 37267133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison-Based Image Quality Assessment for Selecting Image Restoration Parameters.
    Liang H; Weller DS
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2016 Nov; 25(11):5118-5130. PubMed ID: 27552759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. CSPP-IQA: a multi-scale spatial pyramid pooling-based approach for blind image quality assessment.
    Chen J; Qin F; Lu F; Guo L; Li C; Yan K; Zhou X
    Neural Comput Appl; 2022 Oct; ():1-12. PubMed ID: 36276656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Image quality assessment based on the perceived structural similarity index of an image.
    Yao J; Shen J; Yao C
    Math Biosci Eng; 2023 Mar; 20(5):9385-9409. PubMed ID: 37161248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. TOPIQ: A Top-Down Approach From Semantics to Distortions for Image Quality Assessment.
    Chen C; Mo J; Hou J; Wu H; Liao L; Sun W; Yan Q; Lin W
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2024; 33():2404-2418. PubMed ID: 38517711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A feature-enriched completely blind image quality evaluator.
    Lin Zhang ; Lei Zhang ; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2015 Aug; 24(8):2579-91. PubMed ID: 25915960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. BM-IQE: An Image Quality Evaluator with Block-Matching for Both Real-Life Scenes and Remote Sensing Scenes.
    Xu N; Ma D; Ren G; Huang Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Jun; 20(12):. PubMed ID: 32575567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Multivariate Statistical Approach to Image Quality Tasks.
    Gupta P; Bampis CG; Glover JL; Paulter NG; Bovik AC
    J Imaging; 2018; 4(10):. PubMed ID: 33043059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Predicting the Quality of Images Compressed after Distortion in Two Steps.
    Yu X; Bampis CG; Gupta P; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2019 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 31226076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Medical Image Quality Assessment Using CSO Based Deep Neural Network.
    Jayageetha J; Vasanthanayaki C
    J Med Syst; 2018 Oct; 42(11):224. PubMed ID: 30288616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Underwater image quality assessment method based on color space multi-feature fusion.
    Chen T; Yang X; Li N; Wang T; Ji G
    Sci Rep; 2023 Oct; 13(1):16838. PubMed ID: 37803169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A Multiscale Approach to Deep Blind Image Quality Assessment.
    Liu M; Huang J; Zeng D; Ding X; Paisley J
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2023 Feb; PP():. PubMed ID: 37027757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. No-reference image quality assessment of magnetic resonance images with high-boost filtering and local features.
    Oszust M; Piórkowski A; Obuchowicz R
    Magn Reson Med; 2020 Sep; 84(3):1648-1660. PubMed ID: 32052485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Conv-Former: A Novel Network Combining Convolution and Self-Attention for Image Quality Assessment.
    Han L; Lv H; Zhao Y; Liu H; Bi G; Yin Z; Fang Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Dec; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 36617024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. No Reference Quality Assessment for Screen Content Images With Both Local and Global Feature Representation.
    Fang Y; Yan J; Li L; Wu J; Lin W
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2018 Apr; 27(4):1600-1610. PubMed ID: 29324414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.