These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38691581)
1. Diaphyseal Impaction Grafting Combined with Metaphyseal Cones: Outcomes in 88 Revision Total Knee Arthroplasties. Bedard NA; Dugdale EM; Couch CC; Lewallen DG; Sierra RJ; Berry DJ; Abdel MP J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2024 Jul; 106(14):1293-1299. PubMed ID: 38691581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Outcomes of a technique combining diaphyseal impaction grafting and metaphyseal cones for severe bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty. Bedard NA; Cates RA; Lewallen DG; Sierra RJ; Hanssen AD; Berry DJ; Abdel MP Bone Joint J; 2020 Jun; 102-B(6_Supple_A):116-122. PubMed ID: 32475283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 3D-Printed Metaphyseal Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasties: Excellent Survivorship of 740 Cones at 5 Years. Carender CN; Bothun CE; Taunton MJ; Perry KI; Bedard NA; Pagnano MW; Abdel MP J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2024 Sep; 106(18):1688-1696. PubMed ID: 38875316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mid-term results of tibial cones : reasonable survivorship but increased failure in those with significant bone loss and prior infection. Hernandez NM; Hinton ZW; Wu CJ; Ryan SP; Bolognesi MP Bone Joint J; 2021 Jun; 103-B(6 Supple A):158-164. PubMed ID: 34053275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Do Metaphyseal Cones and Stems Provide Any Biomechanical Advantage for Moderate Contained Tibial Defects in Revision TKA? A Finite-Element Analysis Based on a Cadaver Model. Quevedo González FJ; Meyers KN; Schraut N; Mehrotra KG; Lipman JD; Wright TM; Ast MP Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Nov; 479(11):2534-2546. PubMed ID: 34351312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Metaphyseal cones combined with diaphyseal impaction grafting provide good outcomes and survival in a complex revision total knee arthroplasty: a matched comparative analysis. Dzidzishvili L; Sáez D; Calvo E Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2024 Jan; 34(1):577-583. PubMed ID: 37656276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Excellent two-year survivorship of 3D-printed metaphyseal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty. Tetreault MW; Perry KI; Pagnano MW; Hanssen AD; Abdel MP Bone Joint J; 2020 Jun; 102-B(6_Supple_A):107-115. PubMed ID: 32475272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Porous Tantalum Metaphyseal Cones for Severe Femoral and Tibial Bone Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty are Reliable for Fixation at Mean 5-Year Follow-Up. Kayani B; Howard LC; Neufeld ME; Greidanus NV; Masri BA; Garbuz DS J Arthroplasty; 2024 Sep; 39(9S2):S374-S379. PubMed ID: 38508344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Survivorship and Radiographic Evaluation of Metaphyseal Cones With Short Cemented Stems in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. Behery OA; Shing EZ; Yu Z; Springer BD; Fehring TK; Otero JE J Arthroplasty; 2022 Feb; 37(2):330-335. PubMed ID: 34742873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Varus-valgus constraint in 416 revision total knee arthroplasties with cemented stems provides a reliable reconstruction with a low subsequent revision rate at early to mid-term review. Limberg AK; Tibbo ME; Pagnano MW; Perry KI; Hanssen AD; Abdel MP Bone Joint J; 2020 Apr; 102-B(4):458-462. PubMed ID: 32228079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 3D-printed titanium metaphyseal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty with cemented and cementless stems. Anderson LA; Christie M; Blackburn BE; Mahan C; Earl C; Pelt CE; Peters CL; Gililland J Bone Joint J; 2021 Jun; 103-B(6 Supple A):150-157. PubMed ID: 34053297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcomes of Metaphyseal Cones and Stem Fixation Following Rotating Hinge in Complex Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. Lizcano JD; Goh GS; Kohli M; Deirmengian GK; Arsoy D; Courtney PM J Arthroplasty; 2024 Aug; 39(8S1):S248-S255. PubMed ID: 38360286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of porous custom-made cones for meta-diaphyseal bone defects reconstruction in knee revision surgery: a clinical and biomechanical analysis. Burastero G; Pianigiani S; Zanvettor C; Cavagnaro L; Chiarlone F; Innocenti B Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2020 Dec; 140(12):2041-2055. PubMed ID: 33170352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty: a five to nine-year follow-up. Kamath AF; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Feb; 97(3):216-23. PubMed ID: 25653322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Midterm Results of Porous Tantalum Femoral Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. Potter GD; Abdel MP; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Aug; 98(15):1286-91. PubMed ID: 27489319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Survivorship of Metaphyseal Cones and Sleeves in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. Heidenreich MJ; Lanting BA; McCalden RW; Naudie DD; Howard JL; MacDonald SJ; Vasarhelyi EM J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jun; 37(6S):S263-S269. PubMed ID: 35257822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiographic and clinical analysis of a Porous-coated metaphyseal cone for revision total Knee arthroplasty. Guntin J; Bartosiak KA; Della Valle CJ; Patel A; Gerlinger TL; Nam D Knee; 2022 Aug; 37():162-170. PubMed ID: 35803170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Metaphyseal Fixation Using Highly Porous Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Minimum Two Year Follow Up Study. Denehy KM; Abhari S; Krebs VE; Higuera-Rueda CA; Samuel LT; Sultan AA; Mont MA; Malkani AL J Arthroplasty; 2019 Oct; 34(10):2439-2443. PubMed ID: 31000405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]