BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3869188)

  • 1. [Post-treatment changes after maxillary protraction therapy].
    Ishii H; Morita S; Ogasawara J; Matsubara S; Sekiguchi H; Sato M; Nakamura S
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1985 Dec; 44(4):715-26. PubMed ID: 3869188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Protraction of the maxillofacial complex.
    Mermigos J; Full CA; Andreasen G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Jul; 98(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 2363406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Application of a maxillary forward-traction device in skeletal Class III malocclusion].
    Miki Y; Kuroda Y; Tokizane C; Shimizu T; Ikoma Y; Susami R
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1985 Mar; 44(1):144-59. PubMed ID: 3859557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Treatment effect of combined maxillary protraction and chincap appliance in severe skeletal Class III cases.
    Ishii H; Morita S; Takeuchi Y; Nakamura S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Oct; 92(4):304-12. PubMed ID: 3477949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Experimental study on the displacement of the maxillary complex produced by forward extraoral traction].
    Tanabe T; Suginome K; Yoshida Y; Nishiguchi S
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1983 Sep; 42(3):322-35. PubMed ID: 6580358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The upper jaw forward traction method using the removable apparatus (author's transl)].
    Nakano H; Miura H; Yagi M; Kamegai T; Ishikawa F
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1980 Jun; 39(2):239-45. PubMed ID: 6935315
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Maxillary features following protraction headgear therapy in skeletal Class III patients].
    Viteporn S; Mathurasai W
    J Dent Assoc Thai; 1990; 40(4):148-56. PubMed ID: 2074327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Stability of occlusion after orthopedic approach (author's transl)].
    Nakamura S
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1979; 38(2):132-43. PubMed ID: 297116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Treatment and posttreatment effects of a facial mask combined with a bite-block appliance in Class III malocclusion.
    Cozza P; Baccetti T; Mucedero M; Pavoni C; Franchi L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):300-10. PubMed ID: 20816299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Early treatment to correct Class III relations with or without face masks.
    Godt A; Zeyher C; Schatz-Maier D; Göz G
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 18193968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [A statistical study of the effect of a chincap combined with a maxillary protraction appliance to a case of reversed occlusion].
    Ishii H; Matsubara S; Kitano T; Morita S; Ogasawara J; Sato M
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1985 Sep; 44(3):556-67. PubMed ID: 3866813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The importance of the use of the chin-cap for obtaining changes in the tendency of growth].
    Guardo CR
    Ortodoncia; 1980 May; 44(87):34-44. PubMed ID: 6937851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Skeletal and dental effects of a mini maxillary protraction appliance.
    Altug Z; Arslan AD
    Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):360-8. PubMed ID: 16637712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors contributing to stability of protraction facemask treatment of Class III malocclusion.
    Gu Y
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 Nov; 26(2):171-7. PubMed ID: 21175028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dentofacial changes in children with negative overjet treated by a combined orthodontic and orthopaedic approach.
    Stensland A; Wisth PJ; Böe OE
    Eur J Orthod; 1988 Feb; 10(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 3162878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Long-term results of skeletal profile changes occurring during chincap therapy in male Japanese skeletal Class III cases].
    Tsuchikawa T; Sugawara J; Nakamura H; Mitani H
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1985 Dec; 44(4):644-59. PubMed ID: 3869183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative evaluation of maxillary protraction with or without skeletal anchorage.
    Sar C; Arman-Özçırpıcı A; Uçkan S; Yazıcı AC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 May; 139(5):636-49. PubMed ID: 21536207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Evaluation using the Bjork implant and the results obtained in orthodontic treatment of the maxilla in class III].
    Merlini C; Amelotti C; Nidoli G; Pozzi A
    Mondo Ortod; 1982; 7(4):47-68. PubMed ID: 6960254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of protraction headgear on Class III malocclusion.
    Ngan P; Wei SH; Hagg U; Yiu CK; Merwin D; Stickel B
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Mar; 23(3):197-207. PubMed ID: 1641462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of maxillary protraction on craniofacial structures and upper-airway dimension.
    Hiyama S; Suda N; Ishii-Suzuki M; Tsuiki S; Ogawa M; Suzuki S; Kuroda T
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Feb; 72(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 11843272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.