These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3869214)

  • 21. A comparison of 15 year old children with excellent occlusion and with crowding of the teeth, Angle Class I malocclusion, in respect of face size and shape and tooth size.
    Adams CP
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1982; 15():11-26. PubMed ID: 6963765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Roentgencephalometric standards for the facial skeleton and soft tissue profile of Swedish children and young adults. II. Comparisons with earlier Scandinavian normative data.
    Thilander B; Persson M; Skagius S
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1982; 15():219-28. PubMed ID: 6963777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A cephalometric study of facial types and occlusion classes and relation between them in Finnish children.
    Haavikko K; Helle A
    Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1974 Jun; 70(3):99-106. PubMed ID: 4850162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Analysis of dentofacial structures with a graphic "is-should be" comparison].
    Hollmann K
    Inf Orthod Kieferorthop; 1984; 16(4):407-16. PubMed ID: 6595227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cephalometric analysis of occlusal plane angulation: a comparison of regression in male and female samples.
    Monteith BD
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1985 Nov; 40(11):639-42. PubMed ID: 3869371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [A study of occlusion and dento-facial pattern--of a group of unselected school children in Iwate, Japan].
    Endo T
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1970; 29(2):111-26. PubMed ID: 5283267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Facial differences between northern and southern European children.
    Canut J; Miñana PM; Plasencia E
    Angle Orthod; 1987 Jan; 57(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 3469929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cephalometric comparisons of dentofacial parameters between Egyptian and North American adolescents.
    Bishara SE; Abdalla EM; Hoppens BJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 May; 97(5):413-21. PubMed ID: 2333855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dento-facial morphology in patients with advanced attrition.
    Krogstad O; Dahl BL
    Eur J Orthod; 1985 Feb; 7(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 3856524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. ANB skeletal types correlated to facial morphology: Euclidean distance matrix analysis.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; D'Addona A; Miani A; Poggio CE
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1993; 8(3):181-90. PubMed ID: 8301166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Reproducibility of linear and angular measurements in cephalometric analysis].
    Fotis V; Melsen B; Terp S
    Mondo Ortod; 1983; 8(4):27-38. PubMed ID: 6590953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [A morphological study on the hard and soft tissue profiles of thumbsucking children using roentgen cephalograms].
    Mashita K
    Shigaku; 1985 Apr; 72(6):1230-50. PubMed ID: 3859785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Integration of certain facial skeletal variants in the determination of facial morphology.
    Seshadri B
    J Indian Orthod Soc; 1977; 9(2):21-38. PubMed ID: 296293
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Craniofacial and dental study of mulibrey nanism.
    Myllärniemi S; Koski K; Perheentupa J
    Cleft Palate J; 1978 Oct; 15(4):369-77. PubMed ID: 281281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [The sagittal relation of the craniofacial skeletal base as analysed by 3 cephalometric methods based respectively on angle, line and arch value].
    Miotti F
    G Stomatol Ortognatodonzia; 1983; 2(1):121-3. PubMed ID: 6583174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Length of the face in adults with natural teeth].
    Dahl BL
    Nor Tannlaegeforen Tid; 1979 Nov; 89(10):532-7. PubMed ID: 293634
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An orthognathic simulation system integrating teeth, jaw and face data using 3D cephalometry.
    Noguchi N; Tsuji M; Shigematsu M; Goto M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jul; 36(7):640-5. PubMed ID: 17368000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Cephalometric values using the Bjork analysis of white Brazilian adolescents with normal occlusion].
    dos Santos Martins N; Vigorito JW
    Ortodontia; 1987; 20(1-2):18-38. PubMed ID: 3506991
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Perception of facial esthetics by native Chinese participants by using manipulated digital imagery techniques.
    Maganzini AL; Tseng JY; Epstein JZ
    Angle Orthod; 2000 Oct; 70(5):393-9. PubMed ID: 11037000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Gnathologic orthopedic diagnosis using Bimler cephalometric analysis.
    Howard JT
    J Am Acad Gnathol Orthop; 1990 Mar; 7(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 2373650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.