118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38692768)
1. Effect of laparoscopic handle size on surgical performance: A randomized crossover trial.
Tsumanuma FK; Hembecker PK; Claus CMP; Loureiro MP; Reinert F; Abreu de Souza M
Med Eng Phys; 2024 May; 127():104165. PubMed ID: 38692768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of ergonomic laparoscopic tool handle design on performance and efficiency.
Tung KD; Shorti RM; Downey EC; Bloswick DS; Merryweather AS
Surg Endosc; 2015 Sep; 29(9):2500-5. PubMed ID: 25537377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Initial experience using a robotic-driven laparoscopic needle holder with ergonomic handle: assessment of surgeons' task performance and ergonomics.
Sánchez-Margallo JA; Sánchez-Margallo FM
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Dec; 12(12):2069-2077. PubMed ID: 28695479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ergonomic Design and Assessment of an Improved Handle for a Laparoscopic Dissector Based on 3D Anthropometry.
Du Y; Jiang R; Wang H
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Jan; 20(3):. PubMed ID: 36767729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of novel shift handle laparoscopic tool on wrist ergonomics and task performance.
Yu D; Lowndes B; Morrow M; Kaufman K; Bingener J; Hallbeck S
Surg Endosc; 2016 Aug; 30(8):3480-90. PubMed ID: 26541720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic Assistance Confers Ambidexterity to Laparoscopic Surgeons.
Choussein S; Srouji SS; Farland LV; Wietsma A; Missmer SA; Hollis M; Yu RN; Pozner CN; Gargiulo AR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 28734971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ergonomic aspects of five different types of laparoscopic instrument handles under dynamic conditions with respect to specific laparoscopic tasks: an electromyographic-based study.
Matern U; Kuttler G; Giebmeyer C; Waller P; Faist M
Surg Endosc; 2004 Aug; 18(8):1231-41. PubMed ID: 15457383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 3D straight-stick laparoscopy versus 3D robotics for task performance in novice surgeons: a randomised crossover trial.
Shakir F; Jan H; Kent A
Surg Endosc; 2016 Dec; 30(12):5380-5387. PubMed ID: 27059971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ergonomics of disposable handles for minimally invasive surgery.
Büchel D; Mårvik R; Hallabrin B; Matern U
Surg Endosc; 2010 May; 24(5):992-1004. PubMed ID: 19866236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills Performance: 2D Versus 3D Vision and Classic Instrument Versus New Hand-Held Robotic Device for Laparoscopy.
Leite M; Carvalho AF; Costa P; Pereira R; Moreira A; Rodrigues N; Laureano S; Correia-Pinto J; Vilaça JL; Leão P
Surg Innov; 2016 Feb; 23(1):52-61. PubMed ID: 25994623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A randomized controlled study to establish the effect of articulating instruments on performance in single-incision laparoscopic surgery.
Corker HP; Singh P; Sodergren MH; Balaji S; Kwasnicki RM; Darzi AW; Paraskeva P
J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 25218370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An ergonomic study of the optimum operating table height for laparoscopic surgery.
Berquer R; Smith WD; Davis S
Surg Endosc; 2002 Mar; 16(3):416-21. PubMed ID: 11928019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does surgeon sex and anthropometry matter for tool usability in traditional laparoscopic surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hislop J; Orth D; Tirosh O; Isaksson M; Hensman C; McCormick J
Surg Endosc; 2023 Sep; 37(9):6640-6659. PubMed ID: 37433911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of preferred music on mental workload and laparoscopic surgical performance in a simulated setting (OPTIMISE): a randomized controlled crossover study.
Fu VX; Oomens P; Kleinrensink VEE; Sleurink KJ; Borst WM; Wessels PE; Lange JF; Kleinrensink GJ; Jeekel J
Surg Endosc; 2021 Sep; 35(9):5051-5061. PubMed ID: 33026515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Building a framework for ergonomic research on laparoscopic instrument handles.
Li Z; Wang G; Tan J; Sun X; Lin H; Zhu S
Int J Surg; 2016 Jun; 30():74-82. PubMed ID: 27109205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Skills Comparison in Pediatric Residents Using a 2-Dimensional versus a 3-Dimensional High-Definition Camera in a Pediatric Laparoscopic Simulator.
Guanà R; Ferrero L; Garofalo S; Cerrina A; Cussa D; Arezzo A; Schleef J
J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(4):644-649. PubMed ID: 28039097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ergonomic assessment of optimum operating table height for hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery.
Manasnayakorn S; Cuschieri A; Hanna GB
Surg Endosc; 2009 Apr; 23(4):783-9. PubMed ID: 18629584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Investigation of grip force, normal force, contact area, hand size, and handle size for cylindrical handles.
Seo NJ; Armstrong TJ
Hum Factors; 2008 Oct; 50(5):734-44. PubMed ID: 19110833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS™) versus standard laparoscopic surgery: a comparison of performance using a surgical simulator.
Santos BF; Enter D; Soper NJ; Hungness ES
Surg Endosc; 2011 Feb; 25(2):483-90. PubMed ID: 20585958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Experienced surgeons can do more than one thing at a time: effect of distraction on performance of a simple laparoscopic and cognitive task by experienced and novice surgeons.
Hsu KE; Man FY; Gizicki RA; Feldman LS; Fried GM
Surg Endosc; 2008 Jan; 22(1):196-201. PubMed ID: 17705087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
