These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38692907)

  • 21. Physical and mechanical evaluation of dental resin composite after modification with two different types of Montmorillonite nanoclay.
    Elmergawy FH; Nassif MS; El-Borady OM; Mabrouk M; El-Korashy DI
    J Dent; 2021 Sep; 112():103731. PubMed ID: 34192560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Can phenyl-propanedione influence Knoop hardness, rate of polymerization and bond strength of resin composite restorations?
    Brandt WC; Tomaselli Lde O; Correr-Sobrinho L; Sinhoreti MA
    J Dent; 2011 Jun; 39(6):438-47. PubMed ID: 21510999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Degree of conversion of bulk-fill compared to conventional resin-composites at two time intervals.
    Alshali RZ; Silikas N; Satterthwaite JD
    Dent Mater; 2013 Sep; 29(9):e213-7. PubMed ID: 23845799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Time-dependent degree of conversion, Martens parameters, and flexural strength of different dual-polymerizing resin composite luting materials.
    Kelch M; Stawarczyk B; Mayinger F
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jan; 26(1):1067-1076. PubMed ID: 34342762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of photopolymerization on the degree of conversion, polymerization kinetic, biaxial flexure strength, and modulus of self-adhesive resin cements.
    Aguiar TR; de Oliveira M; Arrais CA; Ambrosano GM; Rueggeberg F; Giannini M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Feb; 113(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 25432362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Physico-mechanical characteristics of commercially available bulk-fill composites.
    Leprince JG; Palin WM; Vanacker J; Sabbagh J; Devaux J; Leloup G
    J Dent; 2014 Aug; 42(8):993-1000. PubMed ID: 24874951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Fracture strength and nanoleakage of weakened roots reconstructed using relined glass fiber-reinforced dowels combined with a novel prefabricated core system.
    Amin RA; Mandour MH; Abd El-Ghany OS
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Aug; 23(6):484-94. PubMed ID: 24495157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Flexural strength of glass fibre-reinforced posts bonded to dual-cure composite resin cements.
    Davis P; Melo LS; Foxton RM; Sherriff M; Pilecki P; Mannocci F; Watson TF
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2010 Apr; 118(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 20487010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Wear and hardness of different core build-up materials.
    Schmage P; Nergiz I; Sito F; Platzer U; Rosentritt M
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2009 Oct; 91(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 19402146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. In vitro evaluation of five core materials.
    Gu S; Rasimick BJ; Deutsch AS; Musikant BL
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 17244304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of Polymerization Shrinkage, Physical Properties, and Marginal Adaptation of Flowable and Restorative Bulk Fill Resin-Based Composites.
    Jung JH; Park SH
    Oper Dent; 2017; 42(4):375-386. PubMed ID: 28402737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of intermediate adhesive resin and flowable resin application on the interfacial adhesion of resin composite to pre-impregnated unidirectional S2-glass fiber bundles.
    Polacek P; Pavelka V; Özcan M
    J Adhes Dent; 2014 Apr; 16(2):155-9. PubMed ID: 24683594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of physical properties of three commercial composite core build-up materials.
    Warangkulkasemkit S; Pumpaluk P
    Dent Mater J; 2019 Mar; 38(2):177-181. PubMed ID: 30381634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Laboratory strength of glass ionomer cement, compomers, and resin composites.
    Piwowarczyk A; Ottl P; Lauer HC; Büchler A
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 12087545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Influence of silane coupling agent on the mechanical performance of flowable fibre-reinforced dental composites.
    Thadathil Varghese J; Cho K; Raju ; Farrar P; Prentice L; Prusty BG
    Dent Mater; 2022 Jul; 38(7):1173-1183. PubMed ID: 35691728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Physical and mechanical properties of dual functional cements-an in vitro study.
    Walcher JG; Leitune VCB; Collares FM; de Souza Balbinot G; Samuel SMW
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Apr; 23(4):1715-1721. PubMed ID: 30155574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A resin composite material containing an eugenol derivative for intracanal post cementation and core build-up restoration.
    Almaroof A; Rojo L; Mannocci F; Deb S
    Dent Mater; 2016 Feb; 32(2):149-60. PubMed ID: 26777114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Investigations towards nano-hybrid resin-based composites.
    Ilie N; Rencz A; Hickel R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jan; 17(1):185-93. PubMed ID: 22392162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Impact of polymerization and storage on the degree of conversion and mechanical properties of veneering resin composites.
    Mayinger F; Reymus M; Liebermann A; Richter M; Kubryk P; Großekappenberg H; Stawarczyk B
    Dent Mater J; 2021 Mar; 40(2):487-497. PubMed ID: 33342921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mechanical properties and bond strength of dual-cure resin composites to root canal dentin.
    Aksornmuang J; Nakajima M; Foxton RM; Tagami J
    Dent Mater; 2007 Feb; 23(2):226-34. PubMed ID: 16497370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.