These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38692945)

  • 1. Effect of scan body designs and internal conical angles on the 3-dimensional accuracy of implant digital scans.
    Park GS; Chang J; Pyo SW; Kim S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul; 132(1):190.e1-190.e7. PubMed ID: 38692945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conventional open-tray impression versus intraoral digital scan for implant-level complete-arch impression.
    Kim KR; Seo KY; Kim S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Dec; 122(6):543-549. PubMed ID: 30955939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of supramucosal height of a scan body and implant angulation on the accuracy of intraoral scanning: An in vitro study.
    Sicilia E; Lagreca G; Papaspyridakos P; Finkelman M; Cobo J; Att W; Revilla-León M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1126-1134. PubMed ID: 36828728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trueness of a device for intraoral scanning to capture the angle and distance between implants in edentulous mandibular arches.
    Carneiro Pereira AL; Carvalho Porto de Freitas RF; de Fátima Trindade Pinto Campos M; Soares Paiva Tôrres AC; Bezerra de Medeiros AK; da Fonte Porto Carreiro A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Dec; 128(6):1310-1317. PubMed ID: 33865563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of implant impression techniques with a scannable healing abutment.
    Jung HT; Kim HY; Song SY; Park JH; Lee JY
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):729-734. PubMed ID: 33832762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of implant scan body geometric modifications on the trueness and scanning time of complete arch intraoral implant digital scans: An in vitro study.
    Lawand G; Ismail Y; Revilla-León M; Tohme H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1189-1197. PubMed ID: 35864021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of scan body design and digital implant analogs on implant replica position in additively manufactured casts.
    Revilla-León M; Fogarty R; Barrington JJ; Zandinejad A; Özcan M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Aug; 124(2):202-210. PubMed ID: 31787272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Clinical Comparative Study of 3-Dimensional Accuracy between Digital and Conventional Implant Impression Techniques.
    Alsharbaty MHM; Alikhasi M; Zarrati S; Shamshiri AR
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Apr; 28(4):e902-e908. PubMed ID: 29423969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Positional accuracy of a single implant analog in additively manufactured casts in biobased model resin.
    Diken Türksayar AA; Demirel M; Petersmann S; Spintzyk S; Donmez MB
    J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105037. PubMed ID: 38703808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of 3-dimensional computer-aided manufactured single-tooth implant definitive casts.
    Buda M; Bratos M; Sorensen JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):913-918. PubMed ID: 29961627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prosthesis accuracy of fit on 3D-printed casts versus stone casts: A comparative study in the anterior maxilla.
    Abdeen L; Chen YW; Kostagianni A; Finkelman M; Papathanasiou A; Chochlidakis K; Papaspyridakos P
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Dec; 34(8):1238-1246. PubMed ID: 36415927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of implant angulation and clinical implant scan body height on the accuracy of complete arch intraoral digital scans.
    Gómez-Polo M; Sallorenzo A; Ortega R; Gómez-Polo C; Barmak AB; Att W; Revilla-León M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jan; 131(1):119-127. PubMed ID: 35337658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing the accuracy of full-arch implant impressions using the conventional technique and digital scans with and without prefabricated landmarks in the mandible: An in vitro study.
    Ke Y; Zhang Y; Wang Y; Chen H; Sun Y
    J Dent; 2023 Aug; 135():104561. PubMed ID: 37236297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of printed casts generated from digital implant impressions versus stone casts from conventional implant impressions: A comparative in vitro study.
    Alshawaf B; Weber HP; Finkelman M; El Rafie K; Kudara Y; Papaspyridakos P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Aug; 29(8):835-842. PubMed ID: 29926977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improved accuracy of digital implant impressions with newly designed scan bodies: an in vivo evaluation in beagle dogs.
    Huang R; Liu Y; Huang B; Zhou F; Chen Z; Li Z
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Dec; 21(1):623. PubMed ID: 34876122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro comparative study between complete arch conventional implant impressions and digital implant scans with scannable pick-up impression copings.
    Conejo J; Yoo TH; Atria PJ; Fraiman H; Blatz MB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Mar; 131(3):475.e1-475.e7. PubMed ID: 38182453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scan accuracy and time efficiency of different implant-supported fixed partial denture situations depending on the intraoral scanner and scanned area: An in vitro study.
    Donmez MB; Mathey A; Gäumann F; Mathey A; Yilmaz B; Abou-Ayash S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1198-1207. PubMed ID: 36868987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative study of the accuracy of an implant intraoral scanner and that of a conventional intraoral scanner for complete-arch fixed dental prostheses.
    Sallorenzo A; Gómez-Polo M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1009-1016. PubMed ID: 33836855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Atraumatic intraoral scans and virtual hybrid casts for custom implant abutments and zirconia implants: Accuracy of the workflow.
    Schubert O; Edelhoff D; Schweiger J; Güth JF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jun; 129(6):920-929. PubMed ID: 34598772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do digital impressions have a greater accuracy for full-arch implant-supported reconstructions compared to conventional impressions? An
    Shaikh M; Lakha T; Kheur S; Qamri B; Kheur M
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2022; 22(4):398-404. PubMed ID: 36511075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.