These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38694142)

  • 1. Prediction Pressure Ulcers in High Care Unit Patients: Evaluating Risk Factors and Predictive Scale Using a Prospective Cross-Sectional Study.
    Indraswari ADW; Aisyiyah U; Kurniawan K; Surboyo MDC
    Avicenna J Med; 2024 Jan; 14(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 38694142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pressure injury risk assessment in intensive care units: Comparison of the reliability and predictive validity of the Braden and Jackson/Cubbin scales.
    Adibelli S; Korkmaz F
    J Clin Nurs; 2019 Dec; 28(23-24):4595-4605. PubMed ID: 31491054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reusability of EMR Data for Applying Cubbin and Jackson Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scale in Critical Care Patients.
    Kim E; Choi M; Lee J; Kim YA
    Healthc Inform Res; 2013 Dec; 19(4):261-70. PubMed ID: 24523990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales; Cubbin and Jackson, Braden, and Douglas scale.
    Jun Seongsook RN; Jeong Ihnsook RN; Lee Younghee RN
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2004 Feb; 41(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 14725784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing the Braden and Jackson/Cubbin Pressure Injury Risk Scales in Trauma-Surgery ICU Patients.
    Higgins J; Casey S; Taylor E; Wilson R; Halcomb P
    Crit Care Nurse; 2020 Dec; 40(6):52-61. PubMed ID: 33257967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [A comparative study on the predictive validity among pressure ulcer risk assessment scales].
    Lee YH; Jeong IS; Jeon SS
    Taehan Kanho Hakhoe Chi; 2003 Apr; 33(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 15314444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predictive Validity of the Cubbin-Jackson and Braden Skin Risk Tools in Critical Care Patients: A Multisite Project.
    Delawder JM; Leontie SL; Maduro RS; Morgan MK; Zimbro KS
    Am J Crit Care; 2021 Mar; 30(2):140-144. PubMed ID: 33644804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Critical Evaluation of the Jackson/Cubbin Pressure Ulcer Risk Scale - A Secondary Analysis of a Retrospective Cohort Study Population of Intensive Care Patients.
    Ahtiala MH; Soppi E; Kivimäki R
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2016 Feb; 62(2):24-33. PubMed ID: 26901387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Translation, adaptation, and validation of the Sunderland Scale and the Cubbin & Jackson Revised Scale in Portuguese.
    Sousa B
    Rev Bras Ter Intensiva; 2013; 25(2):106-14. PubMed ID: 23917975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predictive capacity of risk assessment scales and clinical judgment for pressure ulcers: a meta-analysis.
    García-Fernández FP; Pancorbo-Hidalgo PL; Agreda JJ
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2014; 41(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 24280770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predicting pressure ulcer risk with the modified Braden, Braden, and Norton scales in acute care hospitals in Mainland China.
    Kwong E; Pang S; Wong T; Ho J; Shao-ling X; Li-jun T
    Appl Nurs Res; 2005 May; 18(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 15991112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Therapeutic hypothermia and pressure ulcer risk in critically ill intensive care patients: A retrospective study.
    Ahtiala M; Laitio R; Soppi E
    Intensive Crit Care Nurs; 2018 Jun; 46():80-85. PubMed ID: 29653887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing Predictive Validity of Pressure Ulcer Risk Scales- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Park SH; Lee HS
    Iran J Public Health; 2016 Feb; 45(2):122-33. PubMed ID: 27114977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predictive validity of 4 risk assessment scales for prediction of pressure ulcer development in a hospital setting.
    Källman U; Lindgren M
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2014 Feb; 27(2):70-6. PubMed ID: 24440864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pressure injuries in surgical patients: a comparison of Norton, Braden and Waterlow risk assessment scales.
    Gurkan A; Kirtil I; Aydin YD; Kutuk G
    J Wound Care; 2022 Feb; 31(2):170-177. PubMed ID: 35148625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contribution of individual items to the performance of the Norton pressure ulcer prediction scale.
    Perneger TV; Gaspoz JM; Raë AC; Borst F; Héliot C
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 1998 Oct; 46(10):1282-6. PubMed ID: 9777913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Risk factors related to the development of pressure ulcers in the critical care setting.
    Kaitani T; Tokunaga K; Matsui N; Sanada H
    J Clin Nurs; 2010 Feb; 19(3-4):414-21. PubMed ID: 20500281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors Associated with a High-Risk Profile for Developing Pressure Injuries in Long-Term Residents of Nursing Homes.
    Elli C; Novella A; Nobili A; Ianes A; Pasina L
    Med Princ Pract; 2022; 31(5):433-438. PubMed ID: 36122563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hospital-acquired pressure ulcers: risk factors and use of preventive devices.
    Perneger TV; Héliot C; Raë AC; Borst F; Gaspoz JM
    Arch Intern Med; 1998 Sep; 158(17):1940-5. PubMed ID: 9759692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relationship between pressure ulcer risk based on Norton Scale and on the "Eating/Drinking" need assessment.
    López M; Jiménez JM; Fernández M; Martín B; Cao MJ; Castro MJ
    J Nurs Manag; 2019 Jan; 27(1):117-124. PubMed ID: 30221444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.