These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3869566)

  • 1. A comparison between two dental films and two film-screen combinations in detecting low contrast defects and initial caries.
    Sanderink GC; Scholte CM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1985; 14(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 3869566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ektaspeed and a screen/film system compared with Ultra-Speed in the interpretation of early proximal caries.
    Kogon SL; Stephens RG; Reid JA; Donner A
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1984 May; 50(5):397-401. PubMed ID: 6375836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Proximal surface caries detection with direct-exposure and rare earth screen/film imaging.
    Lundeen RC; McDavid WD; Barnwell GM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Dec; 66(6):734-45. PubMed ID: 3205558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Image contrast in various cassette-screen-film combinations].
    Barth HH; Grasser H
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1985 Dec; 40(12):1230-4. PubMed ID: 3869536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of screen/film combinations for cephalometric radiography.
    McNicol A; Stirrups DR
    Br J Orthod; 1985 Jul; 12(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 3860251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Clinical evaluation of intensifying screens and films for intraoral radiography].
    Okano T; Yoda E
    Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 1983 Mar; 50(1):155. PubMed ID: 6577111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of the accuracy of cephalometric landmark location between two screen/film combinations.
    Stirrups DR
    Angle Orthod; 1989; 59(3):211-5. PubMed ID: 2774297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The reduction of x-ray exposure in dental practice using rare-earth screen--fast film combinations.
    Greig DG
    Br Dent J; 1983 Jul; 155(1):17-8. PubMed ID: 6577879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of radiographic image quality parameters obtained with the REX simulator.
    Magalhaes LA; Drexler GG; deAlmeida CE
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Nov; 147(4):614-8. PubMed ID: 21273198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Digital roentgenographic systems based on photostimulated screens and their comparison with roentgenographic screen-film sets].
    Gorelik FG; Stankevich NE
    Med Tekh; 2006; (5):10-3. PubMed ID: 17133936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experimental evaluation of screen-film combinations for intraoral panoramic radiography.
    Molander B
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1986; 15(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 3470222
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The choice of intensifying screens for radiography of the temporomandibular joint using dental equipment].
    Sewerin I
    Tandlaegebladet; 1986 May; 90(8):351-5. PubMed ID: 3462934
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Reduction of radiation dosage by the use of newer reinforced rare earth films].
    Hofmann T
    Inf Orthod Kieferorthop; 1987; 19(1):107-10. PubMed ID: 3474210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Resolution of several screen-film combinations in rotational panoramic radiography.
    McDavid WD; Morris CR; Tronje G; Welander U
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Jun; 61(6):629-34. PubMed ID: 3459994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of xeroradiographs and two types of film for detecting caries in approximal surfaces of primary teeth.
    White SC; McMullin K
    Caries Res; 1986; 20(5):444-50. PubMed ID: 3463427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adaptation of the Panorex II for use with rare earth screen-film combinations.
    Ponce AZ; McDavid WD; Lundeen RC; Morris CR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Jun; 61(6):645-8. PubMed ID: 3459997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speeds of film-screen combinations for radiography.
    Holloway AF; Cheng CN; Paix D
    J Can Assoc Radiol; 1983 Dec; 34(4):331-4. PubMed ID: 6668304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparative study of films and screens for mammography.
    Kirkpatrick AE; Law J
    Br J Radiol; 1987 Jan; 60(709):73-8. PubMed ID: 3814998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Extraoral x-ray film continues to evolve, improve.
    Rostron T
    Dent Assist; 2003; 72(5):22-5. PubMed ID: 14596151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Film-screen digital radiography.
    Schwenker RP; Eger H
    Radiography; 1985; 51(598):233-5. PubMed ID: 4048409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.