139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38695973)
1. The association between gynecological complaints and the uterine sonographic features in women with a history of cesarean section.
Kellner H; Horky A; Louwen F; Bahlmann F; Al Naimi A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2024 Jul; 310(1):485-491. PubMed ID: 38695973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Anatomy of the sonographic post-cesarean uterus.
Al Naimi A; Wolnicki B; Mouzakiti N; Reinbach T; Louwen F; Bahlmann F
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Dec; 304(6):1485-1491. PubMed ID: 33891206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Two- and three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound in assessment of the impact of selected obstetric risk factors on cesarean scar niche formation: the case-controlled study.
Budny-Winska J; Zimmer-Stelmach A; Pomorski M
Ginekol Pol; 2021; 92(5):378-382. PubMed ID: 33757154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Morphology of the cesarean section scar in the non-pregnant uterus after one elective cesarean section.
Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Rosner-Tenerowicz A; Zimmer M
Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(4):174-179. PubMed ID: 28509317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does the appearance of the cutaneous scar after cesarean section reflect the residual myometrial thickness?
Al Naimi A; Mouzakiti N; Eißmann C; Louwen F; Bahlmann F
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Mar; 303(3):847-851. PubMed ID: 33415438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cesarean Scar Thickness Decreases during Pregnancy: A Prospective Longitudinal Study.
Savukyne E; Machtejeviene E; Kliucinskas M; Paskauskas S
Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Mar; 58(3):. PubMed ID: 35334583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The association of endometrial closure during cesarean section to the risk of developing uterine scar defect: a randomized control trial.
Mohr-Sasson A; Castel E; Dadon T; Brandt A; Etinger R; Cohen A; Zajicek M; Haas J; Mashiach R
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2024 May; 309(5):2063-2070. PubMed ID: 38498161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transvaginal Sonographic Evaluation of Cesarean Section Scar Niche in Pregnancy: A Prospective Longitudinal Study.
Savukyne E; Machtejeviene E; Paskauskas S; Ramoniene G; Nadisauskiene RJ
Medicina (Kaunas); 2021 Oct; 57(10):. PubMed ID: 34684128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Standardized ultrasonographic approach for the assessment of risk factors of incomplete healing of the cesarean section scar in the uterus.
Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Rosner-Tenerowicz A; Zimmer M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Oct; 205():141-5. PubMed ID: 27591715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction of uterine dehiscence using ultrasonographic parameters of cesarean section scar in the nonpregnant uterus: a prospective observational study.
Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Zimmer M
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2014 Oct; 14():365. PubMed ID: 25733122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cesarean section scar measurements in non-pregnant women using three-dimensional ultrasound: a repeatability study.
Glavind J; Madsen LD; Uldbjerg N; Dueholm M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Jun; 201():65-9. PubMed ID: 27064944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of selected risk factors on uterine healing after cesarean section in women with single-layer uterine closure: A prospective study using two- and three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasonography.
Budny-Wińska J; Zimmer-Stelmach A; Pomorski M
Adv Clin Exp Med; 2022 Jan; 31(1):41-48. PubMed ID: 34738347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of the onset of labor on the characteristics of the cesarean scar.
Al Naimi A; Jennewein L; Mouzakiti N; Louwen F; Bahlmann F
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2022 May; 157(2):322-326. PubMed ID: 34077556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. First and Third Trimester Uterine Scar Thickness in Women With Previous Caesarean: A Prospective Comparative Study.
Paquette K; Markey S; Roberge S; Girard M; Bujold E; Demers S
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2019 Jan; 41(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 30316720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing lateral uterine wall defects and residual myometrial thickness after cesarean section.
Al Naimi A; Mouzakiti N; Wolnicki B; Louwen F; Bahlmann F
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Mar; 258():391-395. PubMed ID: 33540191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Uterine caesarean closure techniques affect ultrasound findings and maternal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Stegwee SI; Jordans I; van der Voet LF; van de Ven PM; Ket J; Lambalk CB; de Groot C; Hehenkamp W; Huirne J
BJOG; 2018 Aug; 125(9):1097-1108. PubMed ID: 29215795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cesarean scar thickness in non-pregnant women as a risk factor for uterine rupture.
Risager JK; Uldbjerg N; Glavind J
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Jan; 35(2):389-394. PubMed ID: 31992102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Deficient lower-segment Cesarean section scars: prevalence and risk factors.
Ofili-Yebovi D; Ben-Nagi J; Sawyer E; Yazbek J; Lee C; Gonzalez J; Jurkovic D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jan; 31(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 18061960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gynecological and postpartum ultrasonography of cesarean uterine scar defects: a pictorial essay.
El Agwany AS
J Ultrasound; 2020 Dec; 23(4):613-619. PubMed ID: 31482293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The association between uterine scar defect (niche) and the presence of symptoms.
Mohr-Sasson A; Dadon T; Brandt A; Shats M; Axcelrod M; Meyer R; Zajicek M; Haas J; Mashiach R
Reprod Biomed Online; 2023 Aug; 47(2):103221. PubMed ID: 37277298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
