272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3869660)
1. Physician in a hospital setting.
Zaslow J
Leg Med; 1985; ():323-33. PubMed ID: 3869660
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Medical staff: what should trigger a focused review?
Hosp Peer Rev; 2007 Oct; 32(10):137-8, 143. PubMed ID: 17957881
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Hosptal Care: Delineation of pediatric privileges in hospitals.
Pediatrics; 1982 Nov; 70(5):813-8. PubMed ID: 6957842
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Laying siege to hospital privileges.
Rose M
Am J Nurs; 1984 May; 84(5):612-5. PubMed ID: 6586075
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Joint Commission's medical staff standards for 2001.
Barratt KB
Health Care Law Mon; 2001 Jan; ():7-10. PubMed ID: 11246836
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Hospital and medical staff relations in the USA. I. Legal aspects.
Hirsh HL
Med Law; 1988 Jan; 7(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 3277003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Responding to chiropractors' demands for hospital privileges.
Webb RJ; Foley BM
Healthspan; 1989 Sep; 6(8):3-7. PubMed ID: 10303920
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Hospital credentialing.
Cowan RB; Montgomery CR
J Miss State Med Assoc; 1987 Jan; 28(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 3820289
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Peer review immunity for bad faith activities. Patrick v. Burget fails to provide an answer.
Trankina TJ
J Med Assoc Ga; 1988 Sep; 77(9):724-6. PubMed ID: 3225551
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Exclusions of problem physicians upheld in two cases.
Hosp Law Newsl; 1997 Dec; 15(2):3-7. PubMed ID: 10175627
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The legal perspective. How much process is due?
Johnson RL
Trustee; 1979 Oct; 32(10):12-4, 16, 19-20. PubMed ID: 10289216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. These HMO opponents had to throw in the towel.
Halenar JF
Med Econ; 1981 Oct; 58(20):129. PubMed ID: 10253217
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. HMOs, hospitals, and the law.
Bernstein AR
Hospitals; 1979 Dec; 53(23):35, 38, 42. PubMed ID: 500037
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Questions and answers: revised medical staff standards.
JCAH Perspect; 1984; 4(2):1, 3-7. PubMed ID: 10289547
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A review of the new medical staff standards.
Affeldt JE
Tex Hosp; 1984 Mar; 39(10):13-4. PubMed ID: 10289532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Fifth Circuit: hospitals did not violate the Sherman Act.
Fraiche DD; Carlson WT
Health Law Vigil; 1986 Jul; 9(13):2-3. PubMed ID: 10277100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Medical staff standards may be eased.
Robinson ML
Mod Healthc; 1983 Mar; 13(3):23. PubMed ID: 10289382
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Peer review after Patrick.
Bierig J
J Health Hosp Law; 1988 Jun; 21(6):135-9. PubMed ID: 10287912
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Coping with the problem practitioner: five experts' advice.
Hosp Peer Rev; 1979 Aug; 4(8):101-5. PubMed ID: 10243551
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Clarifications to "medical staff" requirements.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Mar; 24(3):9-10. PubMed ID: 15035234
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
