161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38696978)
1. Passive eDNA sampling facilitates biodiversity monitoring and rare species detection.
Chen X; Li S; Zhao J; Yao M
Environ Int; 2024 May; 187():108706. PubMed ID: 38696978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing fish prey diversity for a critically endangered aquatic mammal in a reserve and the wild using eDNA metabarcoding.
Qu C; Stewart KA; Clemente-Carvalho R; Zheng J; Wang Y; Gong C; Ma L; Zhao J; Lougheed SC
Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):16715. PubMed ID: 33028872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative Evaluation of Common Materials as Passive Samplers of Environmental DNA.
Chen X; Kong Y; Zhang S; Zhao J; Li S; Yao M
Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Aug; 56(15):10798-10807. PubMed ID: 35856738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of passive sampling in environmental DNA metabarcoding technology: Monitoring of fish diversity in the Jiangmen coastal waters.
Zhang L; Zhou W; Jiao M; Xie T; Xie M; Li H; Suo A; Yue W; Ding D; He W
Sci Total Environ; 2024 Jan; 908():168298. PubMed ID: 37939943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating monitoring options for conservation: comparing traditional and environmental DNA tools for a critically endangered mammal.
Qu C; Stewart KA
Naturwissenschaften; 2019 Feb; 106(3-4):9. PubMed ID: 30778682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Investigating the distribution of the Yangtze finless porpoise in the Yangtze River using environmental DNA.
Tang Y; Wu Y; Liu K; Li J; Li H; Wang Q; Yu J; Xu P
PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0221120. PubMed ID: 31398225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Environmental DNA metabarcoding reflects spatiotemporal fish community shifts in the Scheldt estuary.
Van Driessche C; Everts T; Neyrinck S; Halfmaerten D; Verschelde P; Breine J; Bonte D; Brys R
Sci Total Environ; 2024 Jul; 934():173242. PubMed ID: 38763188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative monitoring of diverse fish communities on a large scale combining eDNA metabarcoding and qPCR.
Pont D; Meulenbroek P; Bammer V; Dejean T; Erős T; Jean P; Lenhardt M; Nagel C; Pekarik L; Schabuss M; Stoeckle BC; Stoica E; Zornig H; Weigand A; Valentini A
Mol Ecol Resour; 2023 Feb; 23(2):396-409. PubMed ID: 36151931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Environmental DNA metabarcoding of water samples as a tool for monitoring Iberian freshwater fish composition.
Corral-Lou A; Doadrio I
PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0283088. PubMed ID: 37903086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative environmental DNA metabarcoding shows high potential as a novel approach to quantitatively assess fish community.
Tsuji S; Inui R; Nakao R; Miyazono S; Saito M; Kono T; Akamatsu Y
Sci Rep; 2022 Dec; 12(1):21524. PubMed ID: 36513686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using environmental DNA metabarcoding to monitor fish communities in small rivers and large brooks: Insights on the spatial scale of information.
Van Driessche C; Everts T; Neyrinck S; Halfmaerten D; Haegeman A; Ruttink T; Bonte D; Brys R
Environ Res; 2023 Jul; 228():115857. PubMed ID: 37059322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimizing environmental DNA sampling effort for fish inventories in tropical streams and rivers.
Cantera I; Cilleros K; Valentini A; Cerdan A; Dejean T; Iribar A; Taberlet P; Vigouroux R; Brosse S
Sci Rep; 2019 Feb; 9(1):3085. PubMed ID: 30816174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Environmental DNA metabarcoding of freshwater fish in Malaysian tropical rivers using short-read nanopore sequencing as a potential biomonitoring tool.
Munian K; Ramli FF; Othman N; Mahyudin NAA; Sariyati NH; Abdullah-Fauzi NAF; Haris H; Ilham-Norhakim ML; Abdul-Latiff MAB
Mol Ecol Resour; 2024 May; 24(4):e13936. PubMed ID: 38419264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The future of fish-based ecological assessment of European rivers: from traditional EU Water Framework Directive compliant methods to eDNA metabarcoding-based approaches.
Pont D; Valentini A; Rocle M; Maire A; Delaigue O; Jean P; Dejean T
J Fish Biol; 2021 Feb; 98(2):354-366. PubMed ID: 31644817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Urban landscape-level biodiversity assessments of aquatic and terrestrial vertebrates by environmental DNA metabarcoding.
Zhang S; Zhao J; Yao M
J Environ Manage; 2023 Aug; 340():117971. PubMed ID: 37119629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Passive eDNA collection enhances aquatic biodiversity analysis.
Bessey C; Neil Jarman S; Simpson T; Miller H; Stewart T; Kenneth Keesing J; Berry O
Commun Biol; 2021 Feb; 4(1):236. PubMed ID: 33619330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. eDNA metabarcoding as a promising conservation tool to monitor fish diversity in Beijing water systems compared with ground cages.
Shen M; Xiao N; Zhao Z; Guo N; Luo Z; Sun G; Li J
Sci Rep; 2022 Jun; 12(1):11113. PubMed ID: 35773335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Spatial Representativeness of Environmental DNA Metabarcoding Signal for Fish Biodiversity Assessment in a Natural Freshwater System.
Civade R; Dejean T; Valentini A; Roset N; Raymond JC; Bonin A; Taberlet P; Pont D
PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0157366. PubMed ID: 27359116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Environmental DNA metabarcoding reveals local fish communities in a species-rich coastal sea.
Yamamoto S; Masuda R; Sato Y; Sado T; Araki H; Kondoh M; Minamoto T; Miya M
Sci Rep; 2017 Jan; 7():40368. PubMed ID: 28079122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Environmental DNA reveals quantitative patterns of fish biodiversity in large rivers despite its downstream transportation.
Pont D; Rocle M; Valentini A; Civade R; Jean P; Maire A; Roset N; Schabuss M; Zornig H; Dejean T
Sci Rep; 2018 Jul; 8(1):10361. PubMed ID: 29991759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
