143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38698132)
1. Machine learning for predicting elective fertility preservation outcomes.
Braude I; Haikin Herzberger E; Semo M; Soifer K; Goren Gepstein N; Wiser A; Miller N
Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):10158. PubMed ID: 38698132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fertility preservation in women with malignancies: the accuracy of antral follicle count collected randomly during the menstrual cycle in predicting the number of oocytes retrieved.
Filippi F; Martinelli F; Paffoni A; Reschini M; Raspagliesi F; Somigliana E
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2019 Mar; 36(3):569-578. PubMed ID: 30478807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Oocyte vitrification as an efficient option for elective fertility preservation.
Cobo A; García-Velasco JA; Coello A; Domingo J; Pellicer A; Remohí J
Fertil Steril; 2016 Mar; 105(3):755-764.e8. PubMed ID: 26688429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of cancer stage and grade on fertility preservation outcome and ovarian stimulation response.
Volodarsky-Perel A; Cohen Y; Arab S; Son WY; Suarthana E; Dahan MH; Tulandi T; Buckett W
Hum Reprod; 2019 Mar; 34(3):530-538. PubMed ID: 30689898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Follicular challenge test to predict suboptimal response to gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist trigger in elective oocyte cryopreservation cycles.
Avraham S; Youngster M; Yerushalmi G; Belov Y; Gat I; Kedem A; Yaakov O; Gidoni Y; Barkat J; Baruchin O; Hourvitz A
Sci Rep; 2024 Mar; 14(1):6204. PubMed ID: 38485977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Medical and elective fertility preservation: impact of removal of the experimental label from oocyte cryopreservation.
Schon SB; Shapiro M; Gracia C; Senapati S
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2017 Sep; 34(9):1207-1215. PubMed ID: 28656539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dual trigger for final oocyte maturation improves the oocyte retrieval rate of suboptimal responders to gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist.
Lu X; Hong Q; Sun L; Chen Q; Fu Y; Ai A; Lyu Q; Kuang Y
Fertil Steril; 2016 Nov; 106(6):1356-1362. PubMed ID: 27490046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcomes of ovarian stimulation after treatment with chemotherapy.
Chan JL; Johnson LN; Efymow BL; Sammel MD; Gracia CR
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2015 Oct; 32(10):1537-45. PubMed ID: 26400507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Streamlining follicular monitoring during controlled ovarian stimulation: a data-driven approach to efficient IVF care in the new era of social distancing.
Robertson I; Chmiel FP; Cheong Y
Hum Reprod; 2021 Jan; 36(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 33147345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ovarian response and follow-up outcomes in women diagnosed with cancer having fertility preservation: Comparison of random start and early follicular phase stimulation - cohort study.
Muteshi C; Child T; Ohuma E; Fatum M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Nov; 230():10-14. PubMed ID: 30227359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcome of immature oocytes collection of 119 cancer patients during ovarian tissue harvesting for fertility preservation.
Kedem A; Yerushalmi GM; Brengauz M; Raanani H; Orvieto R; Hourvitz A; Meirow D
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2018 May; 35(5):851-856. PubMed ID: 29574609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Successful elective and medically indicated oocyte vitrification and warming for autologous in vitro fertilization, with predicted birth probabilities for fertility preservation according to number of cryopreserved oocytes and age at retrieval.
Doyle JO; Richter KS; Lim J; Stillman RJ; Graham JR; Tucker MJ
Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):459-66.e2. PubMed ID: 26604065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Should we perform oocyte accumulation to preserve fertility in women with Turner syndrome? A multicenter study and systematic review of the literature.
Brouillet S; Ranisavljevic N; Sonigo C; Haquet E; Bringer-Deutsch S; Loup-Cabaniols V; Hamamah S; Willems M; Anahory T
Hum Reprod; 2023 Sep; 38(9):1733-1745. PubMed ID: 37381072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. BRCA carriers have similar reproductive potential at baseline to noncarriers: comparisons in cancer and cancer-free cohorts undergoing fertility preservation.
Gunnala V; Fields J; Irani M; D'Angelo D; Xu K; Schattman G; Rosenwaks Z
Fertil Steril; 2019 Feb; 111(2):363-371. PubMed ID: 30527950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Oocyte accumulation for fertility preservation in women with benign ovarian tumours with a history of previous surgery, multiple or large cysts.
Legrand C; Keller L; Collinet P; Barbotin AL; Béhal H; Rubod C; Decanter C
Reprod Biomed Online; 2021 Aug; 43(2):205-214. PubMed ID: 34247989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of extent and biochemical parameters of lymphoma on fertility preservation outcome.
Volodarsky-Perel A; Tulandi T; Son WY; Khojah M; Buckett W
Fertil Steril; 2020 Feb; 113(2):400-407.e1. PubMed ID: 32106993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast cancer grade and stage do not affect fertility preservation outcomes.
Wald K; Wang A; Abel MK; Morris J; Letourneau JM; Mok-Lin E; Cedars MI; Rosen MP
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2022 May; 39(5):1155-1161. PubMed ID: 35320444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Oocyte and Embryo Quality Between Random Start and Controlled Ovarian Stimulation Cycles in Cancer Patients Undergoing Fertility Preservation.
İsrafilova G; Şükür YE; Özkavukcu S; Sönmezer MA; Atabekoğlu CS; Özmen B; Berker B; Aytaç R; Koç A; Sönmezer M
Reprod Sci; 2021 Aug; 28(8):2200-2207. PubMed ID: 33409878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In-vitro maturation of oocytes recovered during cryopreservation of pre-pubertal girls undergoing fertility preservation.
Fouks Y; Hamilton E; Cohen Y; Hasson J; Kalma Y; Azem F
Reprod Biomed Online; 2020 Nov; 41(5):869-873. PubMed ID: 32843309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of ovarian reserve parameters for predicting live births in women undergoing in vitro fertilization.
Lukaszuk K; Kunicki M; Liss J; Lukaszuk M; Jakiel G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Jun; 168(2):173-7. PubMed ID: 23485092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
