These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38700696)

  • 1. Why don't all women with extremely dense breasts want MRI screening?
    Berg WA
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Oct; 34(10):6332-6333. PubMed ID: 38700696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiation exposure and screening yield by digital breast tomosynthesis compared to mammography: results of the TOSYMA Trial breast density related.
    Sommer A; Weigel S; Hense HW; Gerß J; Weyer-Elberich V; Kerschke L; Nekolla E; Lenzen H; Heindel W;
    Eur Radiol; 2025 Jan; 35(1):166-176. PubMed ID: 39012526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Breast Cancer Screening Using Mammography, Digital Breast Tomosynthesis, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging by Breast Density.
    Stout NK; Miglioretti DL; Su YR; Lee CI; Abraham L; Alagoz O; de Koning HJ; Hampton JM; Henderson L; Lowry KP; Mandelblatt JS; Onega T; Schechter CB; Sprague BL; Stein S; Trentham-Dietz A; van Ravesteyn NT; Wernli KJ; Kerlikowske K; Tosteson ANA
    JAMA Intern Med; 2024 Oct; 184(10):1222-1231. PubMed ID: 39186304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. ESR Essentials: screening for breast cancer - general recommendations by EUSOBI.
    Marcon M; Fuchsjäger MH; Clauser P; Mann RM
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Oct; 34(10):6348-6357. PubMed ID: 38656711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Supplemental Screening as an Adjunct to Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening in People With Dense Breasts: A Health Technology Assessment.
    Ontario Health (Quality)
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2023; 23(9):1-293. PubMed ID: 39364436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening.
    Comstock CE; Gatsonis C; Newstead GM; Snyder BS; Gareen IF; Bergin JT; Rahbar H; Sung JS; Jacobs C; Harvey JA; Nicholson MH; Ward RC; Holt J; Prather A; Miller KD; Schnall MD; Kuhl CK
    JAMA; 2020 Feb; 323(8):746-756. PubMed ID: 32096852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Re-attendance in supplemental breast MRI screening rounds of the DENSE trial for women with extremely dense breasts.
    Veenhuizen SGA; van Grinsven SEL; Laseur IL; Bakker MF; Monninkhof EM; de Lange SV; Pijnappel RM; Mann RM; Lobbes MBI; Duvivier KM; de Jong MDF; Loo CE; Karssemeijer N; van Diest PJ; Veldhuis WB; van Gils CH;
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Oct; 34(10):6334-6347. PubMed ID: 38639912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Supplemental magnetic resonance imaging plus mammography compared with magnetic resonance imaging or mammography by extent of breast density.
    Kerlikowske K; Zhu W; Su YR; Sprague BL; Stout NK; Onega T; O'Meara ES; Henderson LM; Tosteson ANA; Wernli K; Miglioretti DL
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2024 Feb; 116(2):249-257. PubMed ID: 37897090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Extremely dense breasts: A comprehensive review of increased cancer risk and supplementary screening methods.
    Nissan N; Ochoa Albiztegui RE; Fruchtman-Brot H; Gluskin J; Arita Y; Amir T; Reiner JS; Feigin K; Mango VL; Jochelson MS; Sung JS
    Eur J Radiol; 2025 Jan; 182():111837. PubMed ID: 39577224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. AI performance by mammographic density in a retrospective cohort study of 99,489 participants in BreastScreen Norway.
    Bergan MB; Larsen M; Moshina N; Bartsch H; Koch HW; Aase HS; Satybaldinov Z; Haldorsen IHS; Lee CI; Hofvind S
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Oct; 34(10):6298-6308. PubMed ID: 38528136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breast density implications and supplemental screening.
    Vourtsis A; Berg WA
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Apr; 29(4):1762-1777. PubMed ID: 30255244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Breast cancer screening in women with extremely dense breasts recommendations of the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI).
    Mann RM; Athanasiou A; Baltzer PAT; Camps-Herrero J; Clauser P; Fallenberg EM; Forrai G; Fuchsjäger MH; Helbich TH; Killburn-Toppin F; Lesaru M; Panizza P; Pediconi F; Pijnappel RM; Pinker K; Sardanelli F; Sella T; Thomassin-Naggara I; Zackrisson S; Gilbert FJ; Kuhl CK;
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Jun; 32(6):4036-4045. PubMed ID: 35258677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-Effectiveness of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Screening for Women With Extremely Dense Breast Tissue.
    Geuzinge HA; Bakker MF; Heijnsdijk EAM; van Ravesteyn NT; Veldhuis WB; Pijnappel RM; de Lange SV; Emaus MJ; Mann RM; Monninkhof EM; de Koekkoek-Doll PK; van Gils CH; de Koning HJ;
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2021 Nov; 113(11):1476-1483. PubMed ID: 34585249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Screening Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography in Community Practice by Patient Age, Screening Round, and Breast Density.
    Lowry KP; Coley RY; Miglioretti DL; Kerlikowske K; Henderson LM; Onega T; Sprague BL; Lee JM; Herschorn S; Tosteson ANA; Rauscher G; Lee CI
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Jul; 3(7):e2011792. PubMed ID: 32721031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Role of Supplemental Breast MRI in Screening Women with Mammographically Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Faheem M; Tam HZ; Nougom M; Suaris T; Jahan N; Lloyd T; Johnson L; Aggarwal S; Ullah M; Thompson EW; Brentnall AR
    J Breast Imaging; 2024 Jul; 6(4):355-377. PubMed ID: 38912622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cancer detection rate of breast-MR in supplemental screening after negative mammography in women with dense breasts. Preliminary results of the MA-DETECT-Study after 200 participants.
    Kaiser C; Wilhelm T; Walter S; Singer S; Keller E; Baltzer PAT
    Eur J Radiol; 2024 Jul; 176():111476. PubMed ID: 38710116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Effect of California's Breast Density Notification Legislation on Breast Cancer Screening.
    Chau SL; Alabaster A; Luikart K; Brenman LM; Habel LA
    J Prim Care Community Health; 2017 Apr; 8(2):55-62. PubMed ID: 27799412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast density effect on the sensitivity of digital screening mammography in a UK cohort.
    Payne NR; Hickman SE; Black R; Priest AN; Hudson S; Gilbert FJ
    Eur Radiol; 2025 Jan; 35(1):177-187. PubMed ID: 39017933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Association of Screening With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography With Risk of Interval Invasive and Advanced Breast Cancer.
    Kerlikowske K; Su YR; Sprague BL; Tosteson ANA; Buist DSM; Onega T; Henderson LM; Alsheik N; Bissell MCS; O'Meara ES; Lee CI; Miglioretti DL
    JAMA; 2022 Jun; 327(22):2220-2230. PubMed ID: 35699706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-effectiveness of abbreviated-protocol MRI screening for women with mammographically dense breasts in a national breast cancer screening program.
    Wang J; Greuter MJW; Vermeulen KM; Brokken FB; Dorrius MD; Lu W; de Bock GH
    Breast; 2022 Feb; 61():58-65. PubMed ID: 34915447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.