128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38702497)
1. Preliminary study of standardized semiquantitative method for ultrasonographic breast composition assessment.
Uematsu T; Nakashima K; Nasu H; Igarashi T; Okayama Y; Notsu A
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38702497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Image quality of DWI at breast MRI depends on the amount of fibroglandular tissue: implications for unenhanced screening.
Wielema M; Sijens PE; Pijnappel RM; De Bock GH; Zorgdrager M; Kok MGJ; Rainer E; Varga R; Clauser P; Oudkerk M; Dorrius MD; Baltzer PAT
Eur Radiol; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 38008743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Glandular Tissue Component and Breast Cancer Risk in Mammographically Dense Breasts at Screening Breast US.
Lee SH; Ryu HS; Jang MJ; Yi A; Ha SM; Kim SY; Chang JM; Cho N; Moon WK
Radiology; 2021 Oct; 301(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 34282967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automated fibroglandular tissue segmentation and volumetric density estimation in breast MRI using an atlas-aided fuzzy C-means method.
Wu S; Weinstein SP; Conant EF; Kontos D
Med Phys; 2013 Dec; 40(12):122302. PubMed ID: 24320533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of Adjunctive Ultrasonography for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women Aged 40-49 Years With Varying Breast Density Undergoing Screening Mammography: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
Harada-Shoji N; Suzuki A; Ishida T; Zheng YF; Narikawa-Shiono Y; Sato-Tadano A; Ohta R; Ohuchi N
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Aug; 4(8):e2121505. PubMed ID: 34406400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative Volumetric K-Means Cluster Segmentation of Fibroglandular Tissue and Skin in Breast MRI.
Niukkanen A; Arponen O; Nykänen A; Masarwah A; Sutela A; Liimatainen T; Vanninen R; Sudah M
J Digit Imaging; 2018 Aug; 31(4):425-434. PubMed ID: 29047034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection for breast cancer.
Brem RF; Hoffmeister JW; Rapelyea JA; Zisman G; Mohtashemi K; Jindal G; Disimio MP; Rogers SK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Feb; 184(2):439-44. PubMed ID: 15671360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using deep learning to segment breast and fibroglandular tissue in MRI volumes.
Dalmış MU; Litjens G; Holland K; Setio A; Mann R; Karssemeijer N; Gubern-Mérida A
Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):533-546. PubMed ID: 28035663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast-specific gamma imaging for the detection of breast cancer in dense versus nondense breasts.
Rechtman LR; Lenihan MJ; Lieberman JH; Teal CB; Torrente J; Rapelyea JA; Brem RF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Feb; 202(2):293-8. PubMed ID: 24450668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automated Volumetric Analysis of Mammographic Density in a Screening Setting: Worse Outcomes for Women with Dense Breasts.
Moshina N; Sebuødegård S; Lee CI; Akslen LA; Tsuruda KM; Elmore JG; Hofvind S
Radiology; 2018 Aug; 288(2):343-352. PubMed ID: 29944088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative 3D breast magnetic resonance imaging fibroglandular tissue analysis and correlation with qualitative assessments: a feasibility study.
Ha R; Mema E; Guo X; Mango V; Desperito E; Ha J; Wynn R; Zhao B
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2016 Apr; 6(2):144-50. PubMed ID: 27190766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical applicability and relevance of fibroglandular tissue segmentation on routine T1 weighted breast MRI.
Pujara AC; Mikheev A; Rusinek H; Rallapalli H; Walczyk J; Gao Y; Chhor C; Pysarenko K; Babb JS; Melsaether AN
Clin Imaging; 2017; 42():119-125. PubMed ID: 27951458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Standardized uptake values of normal breast tissue with 2-deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-D: -glucose positron emission tomography: variations with age, breast density, and menopausal status.
Kumar R; Chauhan A; Zhuang H; Chandra P; Schnall M; Alavi A
Mol Imaging Biol; 2006; 8(6):355-62. PubMed ID: 17053861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Screening Outcomes of Supplemental Automated Breast US in Asian Women with Dense and Nondense Breasts.
Kwon MR; Choi JS; Lee MY; Kim S; Ko ES; Ko EY; Han BK
Radiology; 2023 May; 307(4):e222435. PubMed ID: 37097135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography versus mammography for breast cancer screening in women at average risk.
Glechner A; Wagner G; Mitus JW; Teufer B; Klerings I; Böck N; Grillich L; Berzaczy D; Helbich TH; Gartlehner G
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2023 Mar; 3(3):CD009632. PubMed ID: 36999589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Background Parenchymal Enhancement and Fibroglandular Tissue Proportion on Breast MRI: Correlation with Hormone Receptor Expression and Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer.
Öztürk M; Polat AV; Süllü Y; Tomak L; Polat AK
J Breast Health; 2017 Jan; 13(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 28331765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mammographic density, MRI background parenchymal enhancement and breast cancer risk.
Pike MC; Pearce CL
Ann Oncol; 2013 Nov; 24 Suppl 8(Suppl 8):viii37-viii41. PubMed ID: 24131968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST.
Pisano ED; Hendrick RE; Yaffe MJ; Baum JK; Acharyya S; Cormack JB; Hanna LA; Conant EF; Fajardo LL; Bassett LW; D'Orsi CJ; Jong RA; Rebner M; Tosteson AN; Gatsonis CA;
Radiology; 2008 Feb; 246(2):376-83. PubMed ID: 18227537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fatty and fibroglandular tissue volumes in the breasts of women 20-83 years old: comparison of X-ray mammography and computer-assisted MR imaging.
Lee NA; Rusinek H; Weinreb J; Chandra R; Toth H; Singer C; Newstead G
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Feb; 168(2):501-6. PubMed ID: 9016235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
