BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38702624)

  • 1. A novel non-negative Bayesian stacking modeling method for Cancer survival prediction using high-dimensional omics data.
    Shen J; Wang S; Sun H; Huang J; Bai L; Wang X; Dong Y; Tang Z
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 May; 24(1):105. PubMed ID: 38702624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gsslasso Cox: a Bayesian hierarchical model for predicting survival and detecting associated genes by incorporating pathway information.
    Tang Z; Lei S; Zhang X; Yi Z; Guo B; Chen JY; Shen Y; Yi N
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Feb; 20(1):94. PubMed ID: 30813883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cancer survival prognosis with Deep Bayesian Perturbation Cox Network.
    Zhang Z; Chai H; Wang Y; Pan Z; Yang Y
    Comput Biol Med; 2022 Feb; 141():105012. PubMed ID: 34785075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Group spike-and-slab lasso generalized linear models for disease prediction and associated genes detection by incorporating pathway information.
    Tang Z; Shen Y; Li Y; Zhang X; Wen J; Qian C; Zhuang W; Shi X; Yi N
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Mar; 34(6):901-910. PubMed ID: 29077795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicting censored survival data based on the interactions between meta-dimensional omics data in breast cancer.
    Kim D; Li R; Dudek SM; Ritchie MD
    J Biomed Inform; 2015 Aug; 56():220-8. PubMed ID: 26048077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interpretable artificial neural networks incorporating Bayesian alphabet models for genome-wide prediction and association studies.
    Zhao T; Fernando R; Cheng H
    G3 (Bethesda); 2021 Sep; 11(10):. PubMed ID: 34499126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The spike-and-slab lasso Cox model for survival prediction and associated genes detection.
    Tang Z; Shen Y; Zhang X; Yi N
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Sep; 33(18):2799-2807. PubMed ID: 28472220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Application of Bayesian Methods in Cancer Prognosis and Prediction.
    Chu J; Sun NA; Hu W; Chen X; Yi N; Shen Y
    Cancer Genomics Proteomics; 2022; 19(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 34949654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bayesian generalized biclustering analysis via adaptive structured shrinkage.
    Li Z; Chang C; Kundu S; Long Q
    Biostatistics; 2020 Jul; 21(3):610-624. PubMed ID: 30596887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A novel dynamic Bayesian network approach for data mining and survival data analysis.
    Sheidaei A; Foroushani AR; Gohari K; Zeraati H
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2022 Sep; 22(1):251. PubMed ID: 36138394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cox-nnet: An artificial neural network method for prognosis prediction of high-throughput omics data.
    Ching T; Zhu X; Garmire LX
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Apr; 14(4):e1006076. PubMed ID: 29634719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predicting the Survival of Gastric Cancer Patients Using Artificial and Bayesian Neural Networks.
    Korhani Kangi A; Bahrampour A
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(2):487-490. PubMed ID: 29480983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Incorporating biological networks into high-dimensional Bayesian survival analysis using an ICM/M algorithm.
    Pungpapong V
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2021 Oct; 19(5):2150027. PubMed ID: 34693885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prognosis of lasso-like penalized Cox models with tumor profiling improves prediction over clinical data alone and benefits from bi-dimensional pre-screening.
    Jardillier R; Koca D; Chatelain F; Guyon L
    BMC Cancer; 2022 Oct; 22(1):1045. PubMed ID: 36199072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pathway-Structured Predictive Model for Cancer Survival Prediction: A Two-Stage Approach.
    Zhang X; Li Y; Akinyemiju T; Ojesina AI; Buckhaults P; Liu N; Xu B; Yi N
    Genetics; 2017 Jan; 205(1):89-100. PubMed ID: 28049703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A novel 14-gene signature for overall survival in lung adenocarcinoma based on the Bayesian hierarchical Cox proportional hazards model.
    Sun N; Chu J; Hu W; Chen X; Yi N; Shen Y
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jan; 12(1):27. PubMed ID: 34996932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Spike-and-Slab Lasso Generalized Linear Models for Prediction and Associated Genes Detection.
    Tang Z; Shen Y; Zhang X; Yi N
    Genetics; 2017 Jan; 205(1):77-88. PubMed ID: 27799277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accounting for grouped predictor variables or pathways in high-dimensional penalized Cox regression models.
    Belhechmi S; Bin R; Rotolo F; Michiels S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Jul; 21(1):277. PubMed ID: 32615919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multi-omics facilitated variable selection in Cox-regression model for cancer prognosis prediction.
    Liu C; Wang X; Genchev GZ; Lu H
    Methods; 2017 Jul; 124():100-107. PubMed ID: 28627406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Cancer Survival Prediction Method Based on Graph Convolutional Network.
    Wang C; Guo J; Zhao N; Liu Y; Liu X; Liu G; Guo M
    IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2020 Jan; 19(1):117-126. PubMed ID: 31443039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.