These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38703619)

  • 1. Give it a second try? The influence of feedback and performance in the decision of reattempting.
    Chung WY; Darriba Á; Yeung N; Waszak F
    Cognition; 2024 Jul; 248():105803. PubMed ID: 38703619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Event-related potentials in response to feedback following risk-taking in the hot version of the Columbia Card Task.
    de Groot K; van Strien JW
    Psychophysiology; 2019 Sep; 56(9):e13390. PubMed ID: 31069812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When the outcome is different than expected: Subjective expectancy shapes reward prediction error at the FRN level.
    Walentowska W; Severo MC; Moors A; Pourtois G
    Psychophysiology; 2019 Dec; 56(12):e13456. PubMed ID: 31403188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Disentangling performance-monitoring signals encoded in feedback-related EEG dynamics.
    Kirsch F; Kirschner H; Fischer AG; Klein TA; Ullsperger M
    Neuroimage; 2022 Aug; 257():119322. PubMed ID: 35577025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The feedback-related negativity indexes prediction error in active but not observational learning.
    Burnside R; Fischer AG; Ullsperger M
    Psychophysiology; 2019 Sep; 56(9):e13389. PubMed ID: 31054155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the relationship between learning strategy and feedback processing in the weather prediction task--Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Rustemeier M; Schwabe L; Bellebaum C
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Mar; 51(4):695-703. PubMed ID: 23347964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. It is less than you expected: the feedback-related negativity reflects violations of reward magnitude expectations.
    Bellebaum C; Polezzi D; Daum I
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Sep; 48(11):3343-50. PubMed ID: 20655319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of internal models on feedback-related brain activity.
    Wurm F; Ernst B; Steinhauser M
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2020 Oct; 20(5):1070-1089. PubMed ID: 32812148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. EEG correlates of physical effort and reward processing during reinforcement learning.
    Palidis DJ; Gribble PL
    J Neurophysiol; 2020 Aug; 124(2):610-622. PubMed ID: 32727262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interpersonal relationship modulates brain responses to outcome evaluation when gambling for/against others: an electrophysiological analysis.
    Leng Y; Zhou X
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Oct; 63():205-14. PubMed ID: 25218954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Goal relevance influences performance monitoring at the level of the FRN and P3 components.
    Walentowska W; Moors A; Paul K; Pourtois G
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Jul; 53(7):1020-33. PubMed ID: 27091565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Decision- and feedback-related brain potentials reveal risk processing mechanisms in patients with alcohol use disorder.
    Sehrig S; Weiss A; Miller GA; Rockstroh B
    Psychophysiology; 2019 Dec; 56(12):e13450. PubMed ID: 31380569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Representing the consequences of our actions trial by trial: Complex and flexible encoding of feedback valence and magnitude.
    Padrón I; Fernández-Rey J; Acuña C; Pardo-Vazquez JL
    Neuroscience; 2016 Oct; 333():264-76. PubMed ID: 27457038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The neural consequences of flip-flopping: the feedback-related negativity and salience of reward prediction.
    Moser JS; Simons RF
    Psychophysiology; 2009 Mar; 46(2):313-20. PubMed ID: 19207198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Learning-related changes in reward expectancy are reflected in the feedback-related negativity.
    Bellebaum C; Daum I
    Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Apr; 27(7):1823-35. PubMed ID: 18380674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Manipulation of feedback expectancy and valence induces negative and positive reward prediction error signals manifest in event-related brain potentials.
    Pfabigan DM; Alexopoulos J; Bauer H; Sailer U
    Psychophysiology; 2011 May; 48(5):656-64. PubMed ID: 21039585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Randomised prior feedback modulates neural signals of outcome monitoring.
    Mushtaq F; Wilkie RM; Mon-Williams MA; Schaefer A
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 125():868-879. PubMed ID: 26497268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of advice distance on advice taking: Evidence from an ERP study.
    Du X; Ren Y; Wu S; Wu Y
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Jun; 129():56-64. PubMed ID: 30831118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A single-trial estimation of the feedback-related negativity and its relation to BOLD responses in a time-estimation task.
    Becker MP; Nitsch AM; Miltner WH; Straube T
    J Neurosci; 2014 Feb; 34(8):3005-12. PubMed ID: 24553940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correlation of cue-locked FRN and feedback-locked FRN in the auditory monetary incentive delay task.
    Krugliakova E; Klucharev V; Fedele T; Gorin A; Kuznetsova A; Shestakova A
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Jan; 236(1):141-151. PubMed ID: 29196772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.