These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3870466)

  • 1. Clinical evaluation of semiautomatic blood pressure devices for self-recording.
    Steiner R; Lüscher T; Boerlin HJ; Siegenthaler W; Vetter W
    J Hypertens Suppl; 1985 Apr; 3(1):S23-5. PubMed ID: 3870466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer underestimate blood pressure, and by how much?
    Mackie A; Whincup P; McKinnon M
    J Hum Hypertens; 1995 May; 9(5):337-43. PubMed ID: 7623370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Devices for blood pressure self measurement: tested in comparison.
    Anlauf M; Tholl U; Högermeyer D; Hirche H; Roggenbuck U; Simonides R
    Z Kardiol; 1996; 85 Suppl 3():20-5. PubMed ID: 8896295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the DINAMAP blood pressure monitor in an ambulatory primary care setting.
    Ornstein S; Markert G; Litchfield L; Zemp L
    J Fam Pract; 1988 May; 26(5):517-21. PubMed ID: 3367116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Home health-care: accuracy, calibration, exhaust, and failure rate comparisons of digital blood pressure monitors.
    Harrison DW; Kelly PL
    Med Instrum; 1987 Dec; 21(6):323-8. PubMed ID: 3431496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The accuracy of automated blood pressure measuring devices in patients with controlled atrial fibrillation.
    Stewart MJ; Gough K; Padfield PL
    J Hypertens; 1995 Mar; 13(3):297-300. PubMed ID: 7622850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Human factors and design evaluation of digital blood pressure/pulse meters.
    Harrison DW; Gorelczenko PM; Kelly PL
    Med Instrum; 1988 Oct; 22(5):226-9. PubMed ID: 3185314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Blood pressure self-measurement in the elderly: differences between automatic and semi-automatic systems.
    Antonicelli R; Partemi M; Spazzafumo L; Amadio L; Paciaroni E
    J Hum Hypertens; 1995 Apr; 9(4):229-31. PubMed ID: 7595903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Home blood pressure-measuring devices: a comparative study of accuracy.
    Evans CE; Haynes RB; Goldsmith CH; Hewson SA
    J Hypertens; 1989 Feb; 7(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 2926132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Trial of validation of two devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol: the Citizen CH-432B and the Citizen CH-656C.
    Cotte UV; Faltenbacher VH; von Willich W; Bogner JR
    Blood Press Monit; 2008 Feb; 13(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 18199925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Comparative clinical study on the accuracy of conventional and electronic blood pressure self-measuring devices (author's transl)].
    Weber F; Hirche H; Simonides R; Anlauf M
    Z Kardiol; 1981 Sep; 70(9):700-5. PubMed ID: 7303808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Evaluation of the characteristics and performance of an automatic sphygmomanometer (Omega 1400)].
    Gigli G; Casu M; Paganini G; Colombano M; Campostano A; Merlo F; Lamedica G
    Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper; 1991 Mar; 67(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 1930899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Who should be taking the blood pressure?
    de Leeuw PW; Kroon AA
    Neth J Med; 2003 Oct; 61(10):304-6. PubMed ID: 14708906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of two automatic devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension: the Omron M6 (HEM-7001-E) and the Omron R7 (HEM 637-IT).
    Topouchian JA; El Assaad MA; Orobinskaia LV; El Feghali RN; Asmar RG
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Jun; 11(3):165-71. PubMed ID: 16702826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of the Samsung SBM-100A and Microlife BP 3BU1-5 wrist blood pressure measuring devices in adults according to the International Protocol.
    Altunkan S; Ilman N; Altunkan E
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Apr; 12(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 17353656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Self-measurement of blood pressure: assessment of equipment. Canadian Coalition for High Blood Pressure Prevention and Control.
    McKay DW; Campbell NR; Chockalingam A; Ku L; Small C; Wasi S
    Can J Cardiol; 1995 Nov; 11 Suppl H():29H-34H. PubMed ID: 7489541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Devices used for self-measurement of blood pressure. Revised statement of the National High Blood Pressure Education Program.
    Hunt JC; Frohlich ED; Moser M; Roccella EJ; Keighley EA
    Arch Intern Med; 1985 Dec; 145(12):2231-4. PubMed ID: 4074037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Random zero sphygmomanometer versus automatic oscillometric blood pressure monitor; is either the instrument of choice?
    Goonasekera CD; Dillon MJ
    J Hum Hypertens; 1995 Nov; 9(11):885-9. PubMed ID: 8583467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Technical equipment for blood pressure recording.
    Nielsen PE
    Acta Med Scand Suppl; 1982; 670():57-61. PubMed ID: 6964486
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of the Microlife WatchBP Home device for self home blood pressure measurement according to the International Protocol.
    Stergiou GS; Giovas PP; Gkinos CP; Patouras JD
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Jun; 12(3):185-8. PubMed ID: 17496469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.