These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38706127)

  • 1. Beyond bias: A registered examination of the validity of using line bisection to measure non-lateralised attention.
    Mitchell AG; Ahmad Khan A; Stocks H; McIntosh RD
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Jun; ():17470218241254761. PubMed ID: 38706127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On line bisection: Validity and reliability of online measures of pseudoneglect.
    Mitchell AG; Kandt PO; McIntosh RD
    Laterality; 2022 Jul; 27(4):443-466. PubMed ID: 35940957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The end of the line: Antagonistic attentional weightings in unilateral neglect.
    McIntosh RD
    Cortex; 2018 Oct; 107():220-228. PubMed ID: 28807326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Weight and see: Line bisection in neglect reliably measures the allocation of attention, but not the perception of length.
    McIntosh RD; Ietswaart M; Milner AD
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Nov; 106():146-158. PubMed ID: 28923304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biases of spatial attention in vision and audition.
    Sosa Y; Teder-Sälejärvi WA; McCourt ME
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Aug; 73(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 20566234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dissociation between line bisection and mental-number-line bisection in healthy adults.
    Rotondaro F; Merola S; Aiello M; Pinto M; Doricchi F
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():565-76. PubMed ID: 26188312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visuospatial attention in line bisection: stimulus modulation of pseudoneglect.
    McCourt ME; Jewell G
    Neuropsychologia; 1999 Jun; 37(7):843-55. PubMed ID: 10408651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reducing alertness does not affect line bisection bias in neurotypical participants.
    Smaczny S; Bauder D; Sperber C; Karnath HO; de Haan B
    Exp Brain Res; 2024 Jan; 242(1):195-204. PubMed ID: 37994915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Centripetal versus centrifugal bias in visual line bisection: focusing attention on two hypotheses.
    McCourt ME; Garlinghouse M; Slater J
    Front Biosci; 2000 Jan; 5():D58-71. PubMed ID: 10702377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intra- and Inter-Task Reliability of Spatial Attention Measures in Pseudoneglect.
    Learmonth G; Gallagher A; Gibson J; Thut G; Harvey M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138379. PubMed ID: 26378925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatial asymmetries ("pseudoneglect") in free visual exploration-modulation of age and relationship to line bisection.
    Chiffi K; Diana L; Hartmann M; Cazzoli D; Bassetti CL; Müri RM; Eberhard-Moscicka AK
    Exp Brain Res; 2021 Sep; 239(9):2693-2700. PubMed ID: 34218299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The reliability of pseudoneglect is task dependent.
    Mitchell AG; Harris JM; Benstock SE; Ales JM
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Nov; 148():107618. PubMed ID: 32891646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attention biases the perceived midpoint of horizontal lines.
    Toba MN; Cavanagh P; Bartolomeo P
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jan; 49(2):238-46. PubMed ID: 21110990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intra- and inter-task reliability of spatial attention measures in healthy older adults.
    Märker G; Learmonth G; Thut G; Harvey M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226424. PubMed ID: 31869372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of viewing eye on pseudoneglect magnitude.
    McCourt ME; Garlinghouse M; Butler J
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2001 Mar; 7(3):391-5. PubMed ID: 11311040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adult developmental trajectories of pseudoneglect in the tactile, visual and auditory modalities and the influence of starting position and stimulus length.
    Brooks JL; Darling S; Malvaso C; Della Sala S
    Brain Cogn; 2016 Mar; 103():12-22. PubMed ID: 26799680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Related but different: Examining pseudoneglect in audition, touch and vision.
    Eardley AF; Darling S; Dumper P; Browne D; Van Velzen J
    Brain Cogn; 2017 Apr; 113():164-171. PubMed ID: 28242465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the neural origin of pseudoneglect: EEG-correlates of shifts in line bisection performance with manipulation of line length.
    Benwell CS; Harvey M; Thut G
    Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 86(100):370-80. PubMed ID: 24128738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The left posterior cerebellum is involved in orienting attention along the mental number line: An online-TMS study.
    Ciricugno A; Ferrari C; Rusconi ML; Cattaneo Z
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Jun; 143():107497. PubMed ID: 32413432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What's in a line? Verbal, facial, and emotional influences on the line bisection task.
    Hatin B; Sykes Tottenham L
    Laterality; 2016; 21(4-6):689-708. PubMed ID: 26847405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.