These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38706163)

  • 1. Minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit in patients with chronic temporomandibular disorders.
    Son J; Kim ES; Lee YJ; Lee NW; Ha IH
    J Oral Rehabil; 2024 Aug; 51(8):1468-1474. PubMed ID: 38706163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimal clinically important difference in patients who underwent decompression alone for lumbar degenerative disease.
    Nakarai H; Kato S; Kawamura N; Higashikawa A; Takeshita Y; Fukushima M; Ono T; Hara N; Azuma S; Tanaka S; Oshima Y
    Spine J; 2022 Apr; 22(4):549-560. PubMed ID: 34699996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) of upper extremity PROMIS scores in idiopathic adhesive capsulitis.
    Alben MG; Gambhir N; Shankar D; Gordon D; Zuckerman JD; Virk MS
    Clin Rheumatol; 2023 Feb; 42(2):579-589. PubMed ID: 36547817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Defining the minimum clinically important difference for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: insights from the Quality Outcomes Database.
    Asher AL; Kerezoudis P; Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Slotkin JR; Potts EA; Shaffrey ME; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Archer KR; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk MS; Bydon M
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E2. PubMed ID: 29290132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What Preoperative Factors are Associated With Not Achieving a Minimum Clinically Important Difference After THA? Findings from an International Multicenter Study.
    Rojanasopondist P; Galea VP; Connelly JW; Matuszak SJ; Rolfson O; Bragdon CR; Malchau H
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Jun; 477(6):1301-1312. PubMed ID: 31136425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Discordance Abounds in Minimum Clinically Important Differences in THA: A Systematic Review.
    Deckey DG; Verhey JT; Christopher ZK; Gerhart CRB; Clarke HD; Spangehl MJ; Bingham JS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2023 Apr; 481(4):702-714. PubMed ID: 36398323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neck Disability Index, short form-36 physical component summary, and pain scales for neck and arm pain: the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after cervical spine fusion.
    Carreon LY; Glassman SD; Campbell MJ; Anderson PA
    Spine J; 2010 Jun; 10(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20359958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Establishing the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit for the Pain Visual Analog Scale in a Postoperative Hand Surgery Population.
    Randall DJ; Zhang Y; Li H; Hubbard JC; Kazmers NH
    J Hand Surg Am; 2022 Jul; 47(7):645-653. PubMed ID: 35644742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. There are Considerable Inconsistencies Among Minimum Clinically Important Differences in TKA: A Systematic Review.
    Deckey DG; Verhey JT; Gerhart CRB; Christopher ZK; Spangehl MJ; Clarke HD; Bingham JS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2023 Jan; 481(1):63-80. PubMed ID: 36200846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimum clinically important difference of major patient-reported outcome measures in patients undergoing decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Ogura Y; Ogura K; Kobayashi Y; Kitagawa T; Yonezawa Y; Takahashi Y; Yoshida K; Yasuda A; Shinozaki Y; Ogawa J
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2020 Sep; 196():105966. PubMed ID: 32485521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surgical Resection of Intradural Extramedullary Spinal Tumors: Patient Reported Outcomes and Minimum Clinically Important Difference.
    Zuckerman SL; Chotai S; Devin CJ; Parker SL; Stonko DP; Wick JB; Hale AT; McGirt MJ; Cheng JS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Dec; 41(24):1925-1932. PubMed ID: 27111764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What is the minimal important difference of pain intensity, mandibular function, and headache impact in patients with temporomandibular disorders? Clinical significance analysis of a randomized controlled trial.
    Calixtre LB; Oliveira AB; Alburquerque-Sendín F; Armijo-Olivo S
    Musculoskelet Sci Pract; 2020 Apr; 46():102108. PubMed ID: 31999615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What constitutes a clinically important change in Mayo Elbow Performance Index and range of movement after open elbow arthrolysis?
    Sun Z; Li J; Luo G; Wang F; Hu Y; Fan C
    Bone Joint J; 2021 Feb; 103-B(2):366-372. PubMed ID: 33517717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The likelihood of reaching minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit at 2 years following a 3-column osteotomy: analysis of 140 patients.
    Fakurnejad S; Scheer JK; Lafage V; Smith JS; Deviren V; Hostin R; Mundis GM; Burton DC; Klineberg E; Gupta M; Kebaish K; Shaffrey CI; Bess S; Schwab F; Ames CP;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Sep; 23(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 26091440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What Are the MCIDs for PROMIS, NDI, and ODI Instruments Among Patients With Spinal Conditions?
    Hung M; Saltzman CL; Kendall R; Bounsanga J; Voss MW; Lawrence B; Spiker R; Brodke D
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Oct; 476(10):2027-2036. PubMed ID: 30179950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Temporomandibular joint disorders' impact on pain, function, and disability.
    Chantaracherd P; John MT; Hodges JS; Schiffman EL
    J Dent Res; 2015 Mar; 94(3 Suppl):79S-86S. PubMed ID: 25572112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) of upper extremity PROMIS scores following arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs.
    Alben MG; Gordon D; Gambhir N; Kim MT; Romeo PV; Rokito AS; Zuckerman JD; Virk MS
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2023 Jul; 31(7):2602-2614. PubMed ID: 36622420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What Are the Minimum Clinically Important Differences in SF-36 Scores in Patients with Orthopaedic Oncologic Conditions?
    Ogura K; Yakoub MA; Christ AB; Fujiwara T; Nikolic Z; Boland PJ; Healey JH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Sep; 478(9):2148-2158. PubMed ID: 32568896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Risk factors for failure to achieve minimal clinically important difference and significant clinical benefit in PROMIS computer adaptive test domains in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair.
    Tramer JS; Yedulla NR; Ziedas AC; Patel M; Franovic S; Muh SJ; Makhni EC
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Jul; 31(7):1416-1425. PubMed ID: 35172206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinically Meaningful Improvement After Treatment of Cartilage Defects of the Knee With Osteochondral Grafts.
    Wang D; Chang B; Coxe FR; Pais MD; Wickiewicz TL; Warren RF; Rodeo SA; Williams RJ
    Am J Sports Med; 2019 Jan; 47(1):71-81. PubMed ID: 30481044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.