These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38706235)

  • 1. Exploring ChatGPT's abilities in medical article writing and peer review.
    Kadi G; Aslaner MA
    Croat Med J; 2024 Apr; 65(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 38706235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing ChatGPT's ability to emulate human reviewers in scientific research: A descriptive and qualitative approach.
    Suleiman A; von Wedel D; Munoz-Acuna R; Redaelli S; Santarisi A; Seibold EL; Ratajczak N; Kato S; Said N; Sundar E; Goodspeed V; Schaefer MS
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2024 Sep; 254():108313. PubMed ID: 38954915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. ChatGPT and the Future of Journal Reviews: A Feasibility Study.
    Biswas S; Dobaria D; Cohen HL
    Yale J Biol Med; 2023 Sep; 96(3):415-420. PubMed ID: 37780993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exploring the potential of ChatGPT in the peer review process: An observational study.
    Saad A; Jenko N; Ariyaratne S; Birch N; Iyengar KP; Davies AM; Vaishya R; Botchu R
    Diabetes Metab Syndr; 2024 Feb; 18(2):102946. PubMed ID: 38330745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review.
    Hosseini M; Horbach SPJM
    Res Integr Peer Rev; 2023 May; 8(1):4. PubMed ID: 37198671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ChatGPT's Ability to Assess Quality and Readability of Online Medical Information: Evidence From a Cross-Sectional Study.
    Golan R; Ripps SJ; Reddy R; Loloi J; Bernstein AP; Connelly ZM; Golan NS; Ramasamy R
    Cureus; 2023 Jul; 15(7):e42214. PubMed ID: 37484787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other Large Language Models in scholarly peer review.
    Hosseini M; Horbach SPJM
    Res Sq; 2023 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 36865238
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Advancing Medical Practice with Artificial Intelligence: ChatGPT in Healthcare.
    Tessler I; Wolfovitz A; Livneh N; Gecel NA; Sorin V; Barash Y; Konen E; Klang E
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2024 Feb; 26(2):80-85. PubMed ID: 38420977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance of ChatGPT on the Chinese Postgraduate Examination for Clinical Medicine: Survey Study.
    Yu P; Fang C; Liu X; Fu W; Ling J; Yan Z; Jiang Y; Cao Z; Wu M; Chen Z; Zhu W; Zhang Y; Abudukeremu A; Wang Y; Liu X; Wang J
    JMIR Med Educ; 2024 Feb; 10():e48514. PubMed ID: 38335017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. ChatGPT's performance in German OB/GYN exams - paving the way for AI-enhanced medical education and clinical practice.
    Riedel M; Kaefinger K; Stuehrenberg A; Ritter V; Amann N; Graf A; Recker F; Klein E; Kiechle M; Riedel F; Meyer B
    Front Med (Lausanne); 2023; 10():1296615. PubMed ID: 38155661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exploring the potential of ChatGPT as an adjunct for generating diagnosis based on chief complaint and cone beam CT radiologic findings.
    Hu Y; Hu Z; Liu W; Gao A; Wen S; Liu S; Lin Z
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2024 Feb; 24(1):55. PubMed ID: 38374067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exploring the Boundaries of Reality: Investigating the Phenomenon of Artificial Intelligence Hallucination in Scientific Writing Through ChatGPT References.
    Athaluri SA; Manthena SV; Kesapragada VSRKM; Yarlagadda V; Dave T; Duddumpudi RTS
    Cureus; 2023 Apr; 15(4):e37432. PubMed ID: 37182055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Human vs. ChatGPT. Is it possible obtain comparable results in the analysis of a scientific systematic review?].
    Esposito C; Dell'Omo G; Di Ianni D; Di Procolo P
    Recenti Prog Med; 2024 Sep; 115(9):420-425. PubMed ID: 39269357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Utilizing ChatGPT as a scientific reasoning engine to differentiate conflicting evidence and summarize challenges in controversial clinical questions.
    Xie S; Zhao W; Deng G; He G; He N; Lu Z; Hu W; Zhao M; Du J
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2024 Jun; 31(7):1551-1560. PubMed ID: 38758667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. AI language models in human reproduction research: exploring ChatGPT's potential to assist academic writing.
    Semrl N; Feigl S; Taumberger N; Bracic T; Fluhr H; Blockeel C; Kollmann M
    Hum Reprod; 2023 Dec; 38(12):2281-2288. PubMed ID: 37833847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Application of artificial intelligence chatbots, including ChatGPT, in education, scholarly work, programming, and content generation and its prospects: a narrative review.
    Kim TW
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2023; 20():38. PubMed ID: 38148495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical reasoning using ChatGPT: Is it beyond credibility for physiotherapists use?
    Bilika P; Stefanouli V; Strimpakos N; Kapreli EV
    Physiother Theory Pract; 2024 Dec; 40(12):2943-2962. PubMed ID: 38073539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    Verharen JPH
    Elife; 2023 Nov; 12():. PubMed ID: 37922198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of ChatGPT in scientific communication: writing better scientific review articles.
    Huang J; Tan M
    Am J Cancer Res; 2023; 13(4):1148-1154. PubMed ID: 37168339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of ChatGPT in medical research and scientific writing.
    Lee PY; Salim H; Abdullah A; Teo CH
    Malays Fam Physician; 2023; 18():58. PubMed ID: 37814667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.