These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38706638)

  • 1. Assessment of Volumetric Dense Tissue Segmentation in Tomosynthesis Using Deep Virtual Clinical Trials.
    Barufaldi B; Gomes JV; Filho TS; do Rêgo TG; Malheiros Y; Vent TL; Gastounioti A; Maidment A
    Pattern Recognit; 2024 Sep; 153():. PubMed ID: 38706638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of Tomosynthesis Acquisition on 3D Segmentations of Breast Outline and Adipose/Dense Tissue with AI: A Simulation-Based Study.
    Barufaldi B; Gomes J; Rego TGD; Malheiros Y; Filho TMS; Borges LR; Acciavatti RJ; Surti S; Maidment ADA
    Tomography; 2023 Jul; 9(4):1303-1314. PubMed ID: 37489471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A deep learning approach to estimate x-ray scatter in digital breast tomosynthesis: From phantom models to clinical applications.
    Pinto MC; Mauter F; Michielsen K; Biniazan R; Kappler S; Sechopoulos I
    Med Phys; 2023 Aug; 50(8):4744-4757. PubMed ID: 37394837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of a variable dose acquisition technique for microcalcification and mass detection in digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Das M; Gifford HC; O'Connor JM; Glick SJ
    Med Phys; 2009 Jun; 36(6):1976-84. PubMed ID: 19610286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparisons between artificial intelligence computer-aided detection synthesized mammograms and digital mammograms when used alone and in combination with tomosynthesis images in a virtual screening setting.
    Uematsu T; Nakashima K; Harada TL; Nasu H; Igarashi T
    Jpn J Radiol; 2023 Jan; 41(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 36068450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of artificial intelligence support on accuracy and reading time in breast tomosynthesis image interpretation: a multi-reader multi-case study.
    van Winkel SL; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; Appelman L; Gubern-Mérida A; Karssemeijer N; Teuwen J; Wanders AJT; Sechopoulos I; Mann RM
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Nov; 31(11):8682-8691. PubMed ID: 33948701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A virtual trial framework for quantifying the detectability of masses in breast tomosynthesis projection data.
    Young S; Bakic PR; Myers KJ; Jennings RJ; Park S
    Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051914. PubMed ID: 23635284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In-plane image quality and NPWE detectability index in digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Monnin P; Verdun FR; Bosmans H; Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 May; 65(9):095013. PubMed ID: 32191923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Segmented separable footprint projector for digital breast tomosynthesis and its application for subpixel reconstruction.
    Zheng J; Fessler JA; Chan HP
    Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):986-1001. PubMed ID: 28058719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fully Automated Quantitative Estimation of Volumetric Breast Density from Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images: Preliminary Results and Comparison with Digital Mammography and MR Imaging.
    Pertuz S; McDonald ES; Weinstein SP; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Radiology; 2016 Apr; 279(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 26491909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Deep learning-based segmentation in prostate radiation therapy using Monte Carlo simulated cone-beam computed tomography.
    Abbani N; Baudier T; Rit S; Franco FD; Okoli F; Jaouen V; Tilquin F; Barateau A; Simon A; de Crevoisier R; Bert J; Sarrut D
    Med Phys; 2022 Nov; 49(11):6930-6944. PubMed ID: 36000762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Semantic Segmentation of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage, Intraventricular Hemorrhage, and Associated Edema on CT Images Using Deep Learning.
    Kok YE; Pszczolkowski S; Law ZK; Ali A; Krishnan K; Bath PM; Sprigg N; Dineen RA; French AP
    Radiol Artif Intell; 2022 Nov; 4(6):e220096. PubMed ID: 36523645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fully Automated MRI Segmentation and Volumetric Measurement of Intracranial Meningioma Using Deep Learning.
    Kang H; Witanto JN; Pratama K; Lee D; Choi KS; Choi SH; Kim KM; Kim MS; Kim JW; Kim YH; Park SJ; Park CK
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2023 Mar; 57(3):871-881. PubMed ID: 35775971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fully automatic segmentation of craniomaxillofacial CT scans for computer-assisted orthognathic surgery planning using the nnU-Net framework.
    Dot G; Schouman T; Dubois G; Rouch P; Gajny L
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Jun; 32(6):3639-3648. PubMed ID: 35037088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stand-Alone Use of Artificial Intelligence for Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening: A Retrospective Evaluation.
    Romero-Martín S; Elías-Cabot E; Raya-Povedano JL; Gubern-Mérida A; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; Álvarez-Benito M
    Radiology; 2022 Mar; 302(3):535-542. PubMed ID: 34904872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Artificial intelligence for digital breast tomosynthesis: Impact on diagnostic performance, reading times, and workload in the era of personalized screening.
    Magni V; Cozzi A; Schiaffino S; Colarieti A; Sardanelli F
    Eur J Radiol; 2023 Jan; 158():110631. PubMed ID: 36481480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Data Set and Deep Learning Algorithm for the Detection of Masses and Architectural Distortions in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images.
    Buda M; Saha A; Walsh R; Ghate S; Li N; Swiecicki A; Lo JY; Mazurowski MA
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Aug; 4(8):e2119100. PubMed ID: 34398205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Task-based performance analysis of FBP, SART and ML for digital breast tomosynthesis using signal CNR and Channelised Hotelling Observers.
    Van de Sompel D; Brady SM; Boone J
    Med Image Anal; 2011 Feb; 15(1):53-70. PubMed ID: 20713313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis as Replacement of Full-Field Digital Mammography Using an In Silico Imaging Trial.
    Badano A; Graff CG; Badal A; Sharma D; Zeng R; Samuelson FW; Glick SJ; Myers KJ
    JAMA Netw Open; 2018 Nov; 1(7):e185474. PubMed ID: 30646401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.