171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38708385)
21. Evidence-based potential of generative artificial intelligence large language models in orthodontics: a comparative study of ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Microsoft Bing.
Makrygiannakis MA; Giannakopoulos K; Kaklamanos EG
Eur J Orthod; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38613510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. 3D-printed, patient-specific DIEP flap templates for preoperative planning in breast reconstruction: a prospective case series.
Chae MP; Hunter-Smith DJ; Chung RD; Smith JA; Rozen WM
Gland Surg; 2021 Jul; 10(7):2192-2199. PubMed ID: 34422590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Perforator Phase Contrast Angiography of Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforators: A Better Preoperative Imaging Tool for Flap Surgery than Computed Tomographic Angiography?
Yang X; Miller MJ; Friel HT; Slijepcevic A; Knopp MV
Invest Radiol; 2017 Jun; 52(6):334-342. PubMed ID: 28059854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Predicting the Feasibility of Utilizing SIEA Flap for Breast Reconstruction with Preoperative BMI and Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) Data.
Zhang X; Mu D; Yang Y; Li W; Lin Y; Li H; Luan J
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2021 Feb; 45(1):100-107. PubMed ID: 31919624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Both Patients and Plastic Surgeons Prefer Artificial Intelligence-Generated Microsurgical Information.
Berry CE; Fazilat AZ; Lavin C; Lintel H; Cole N; Stingl CS; Valencia C; Morgan AG; Momeni A; Wan DC
J Reconstr Microsurg; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38382637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Generative artificial intelligence chatbots may provide appropriate informational responses to common vascular surgery questions by patients.
Chervonski E; Harish KB; Rockman CB; Sadek M; Teter KA; Jacobowitz GR; Berland TL; Lohr J; Moore C; Maldonado TS
Vascular; 2024 Mar; ():17085381241240550. PubMed ID: 38500300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Large Language Models in Hematology Case Solving: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT-3.5, Google Bard, and Microsoft Bing.
Kumari A; Kumari A; Singh A; Singh SK; Juhi A; Dhanvijay AKD; Pinjar MJ; Mondal H
Cureus; 2023 Aug; 15(8):e43861. PubMed ID: 37736448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Establishment and application of three-dimensional model of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap based on computed tomography angiography].
Yang L; Fang BR; He JY; Wang XC
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi; 2018 May; 34(5):297-302. PubMed ID: 29804428
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The Emerging Role of AI in Patient Education: A Comparative Analysis of LLM Accuracy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Rahimli Ocakoglu S; Coskun B
Med Princ Pract; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38527444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Can Artificial Intelligence Improve the Readability of Patient Education Materials on Aortic Stenosis? A Pilot Study.
Rouhi AD; Ghanem YK; Yolchieva L; Saleh Z; Joshi H; Moccia MC; Suarez-Pierre A; Han JJ
Cardiol Ther; 2024 Mar; 13(1):137-147. PubMed ID: 38194058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Optimising the preoperative planning of deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps for breast reconstruction.
Casares Santiago M; García-Tutor E; Rodríguez Caravaca G; Del Cerro González J; Klein LM; Alonso-Burgos A
Eur Radiol; 2014 Sep; 24(9):2097-108. PubMed ID: 24871336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Preoperative cross-sectional mapping for deep inferior epigastric and profunda artery perforator flaps.
Thimmappa N; Bhat AP; Bishop K; Nagpal P; Prince MR; Saboo SS
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther; 2019 Aug; 9(Suppl 1):S131-S142. PubMed ID: 31559159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. How artificial intelligence can provide information about subdural hematoma: Assessment of readability, reliability, and quality of ChatGPT, BARD, and perplexity responses.
Gül Ş; Erdemir İ; Hanci V; Aydoğmuş E; Erkoç YS
Medicine (Baltimore); 2024 May; 103(18):e38009. PubMed ID: 38701313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Displaying inguinal lymph nodes before transplantation in a deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction using an innovative projection method.
Hummelink S; Schultze Kool LJ; Ulrich DJ
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2016 Mar; 69(3):376-80. PubMed ID: 26620253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Preoperative planning of unilateral breast reconstruction with pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flaps: a pilot study of perforator mapping.
Fong A; Park HS; Ross DA; Rozen WM
Gland Surg; 2023 Mar; 12(3):366-373. PubMed ID: 37057040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. CTA in preoperative planning for DIEP breast reconstruction: what the reconstructive surgeon wants to know. A modified Delphi study.
Wong KK; Stubbs E; McRae M; McRae M
Clin Radiol; 2019 Dec; 74(12):973.e15-973.e26. PubMed ID: 31492417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Decoding medical jargon: The use of AI language models (ChatGPT-4, BARD, microsoft copilot) in radiology reports.
Tepe M; Emekli E
Patient Educ Couns; 2024 Sep; 126():108307. PubMed ID: 38743965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Performance of Large Language Models (ChatGPT, Bing Search, and Google Bard) in Solving Case Vignettes in Physiology.
Dhanvijay AKD; Pinjar MJ; Dhokane N; Sorte SR; Kumari A; Mondal H
Cureus; 2023 Aug; 15(8):e42972. PubMed ID: 37671207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. How to assess a CTA of the abdomen to plan an autologous breast reconstruction.
Rozen WM; Bhullar HK; Hunter-Smith D
Gland Surg; 2019 Oct; 8(Suppl 4):S291-S296. PubMed ID: 31709170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. How AI Responds to Common Lung Cancer Questions: ChatGPT vs Google Bard.
Rahsepar AA; Tavakoli N; Kim GHJ; Hassani C; Abtin F; Bedayat A
Radiology; 2023 Jun; 307(5):e230922. PubMed ID: 37310252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
