These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38708866)

  • 1. Integrating socioeconomic and ecological data into restoration practice.
    Villarreal-Rosas J; Brown CJ; Andradi-Brown DA; Domínguez R; Jacobo P; Martínez A; Mascote C; Najera E; Paiz Y; Vázquez Moran VH; Villarreal J; Adame MF
    Conserv Biol; 2024 Aug; 38(4):e14286. PubMed ID: 38708866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Selecting cost-effective areas for restoration of ecosystem services.
    Adame MF; Hermoso V; Perhans K; Lovelock CE; Herrera-Silveira JA
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Apr; 29(2):493-502. PubMed ID: 25199996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ecological restoration at pilot-scale employing site-specific rationales for small-patch degraded mangroves in Indian Sundarbans.
    Ray K; Basak SK; Giri CK; Kotal HN; Mandal A; Chatterjee K; Saha S; Biswas B; Mondal S; Das I; Ghosh A; Bhadury P; Joshi R
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jun; 14(1):12952. PubMed ID: 38839775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Restoration planning to guide Aichi targets in a megadiverse country.
    Tobón W; Urquiza-Haas T; Koleff P; Schröter M; Ortega-Álvarez R; Campo J; Lindig-Cisneros R; Sarukhán J; Bonn A
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Oct; 31(5):1086-1097. PubMed ID: 28233917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Supporting habitat restoration in the northern Gulf of Mexico through synthesis of data on multiple and interacting benefits and stressors.
    Kiskaddon E; Bienn H; Hemmerling SA; Dalyander S; Grismore A; Parfait J; Miner MD; Cameron C; Hopkins TE; Allen Y; Jones-Farrand D; Martin M; Tirpak BE; Green M; Rhinehart K; Carruthers TJ
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Sep; 318():115589. PubMed ID: 35772270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A meta-analysis of the ecological and economic outcomes of mangrove restoration.
    Su J; Friess DA; Gasparatos A
    Nat Commun; 2021 Aug; 12(1):5050. PubMed ID: 34413296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of suitable habitat of mangrove species for prioritizing restoration in coastal ecosystem of Sundarban Biosphere Reserve, India.
    Sahana M; Areendran G; Sajjad H
    Sci Rep; 2022 Dec; 12(1):20997. PubMed ID: 36470951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nature-based solutions on floodplain restoration with coupled propagule dispersal simulation and stepping-stone approach to predict mangrove encroachment in an estuary.
    Shih SS; Huang ZZ; Hsu YW
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Dec; 851(Pt 1):158097. PubMed ID: 35988606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Integrating science-based and local ecological knowledge: a case study of mangrove restoration and rehabilitation projects in the Philippines.
    Marquez GPB; Olavides RD
    Disasters; 2024 Jul; 48 Suppl 1():e12630. PubMed ID: 38840490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Co-occurrence of biodiversity, carbon storage, coastal protection, and fish and invertebrate production to inform global mangrove conservation planning.
    Sievers M; Brown CJ; McGowan J; Turschwell MP; Buelow CA; Holgate B; Pearson RM; Adame MF; Andradi-Brown DA; Arnell A; Mackey BG; Ermgassen PSEZ; Gosling J; McOwen CJ; Worthington TA; Connolly RM
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 Dec; 904():166357. PubMed ID: 37595913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing spatial conservation prioritization methods with site- versus spatial dependency-based connectivity.
    Muenzel D; Critchell K; Cox C; Campbell SJ; Jakub R; Chollett I; Krueck N; Holstein D; Treml EA; Beger M
    Conserv Biol; 2023 Apr; 37(2):e14008. PubMed ID: 36178033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ecotourism and mangrove conservation in Southeast Asia: Current trends and perspectives.
    Blanton A; Ewane EB; McTavish F; Watt MS; Rogers K; Daneil R; Vizcaino I; Gomez AN; Arachchige PSP; King SAL; Galgamuwa GAP; Peñaranda MLP; Al-Musawi L; Montenegro JF; Broadbent EN; Zambrano AMA; Hudak AT; Swangjang K; Valasquez-Camacho LF; Vorenberg JHP; Srinivasan S; Abdullah MM; Charabi YAR; Wan Mohd Jaafar WS; Musa F; Sidik F; Al-Awadhi T; Ali T; Doaemo W; Mohan M
    J Environ Manage; 2024 Aug; 365():121529. PubMed ID: 38963961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spatial cost-benefit analysis of blue restoration and factors driving net benefits globally.
    Stewart-Sinclair PJ; Klein CJ; Bateman IJ; Lovelock CE
    Conserv Biol; 2021 Dec; 35(6):1850-1860. PubMed ID: 33818808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Costs and Benefits of Delaying Remediation on Ecological Resources at Contaminated Sites.
    Burger J
    Ecohealth; 2019 Sep; 16(3):454-475. PubMed ID: 31377906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impacts of land use on Indian mangrove forest carbon stocks: Implications for conservation and management.
    Bhomia RK; MacKenzie RA; Murdiyarso D; Sasmito SD; Purbopuspito J
    Ecol Appl; 2016 Jul; 26(5):1396-1408. PubMed ID: 27755754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microtargeting for conservation.
    Metcalf AL; Phelan CN; Pallai C; Norton M; Yuhas B; Finley JC; Muth A
    Conserv Biol; 2019 Oct; 33(5):1141-1150. PubMed ID: 30887584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mapping the potential of mangrove forest restoration based on species distribution models: A case study in China.
    Hu W; Wang Y; Zhang D; Yu W; Chen G; Xie T; Liu Z; Ma Z; Du J; Chao B; Lei G; Chen B
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Dec; 748():142321. PubMed ID: 33113686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prioritizing mangrove conservation across Mexico to facilitate 2020 NDC ambition.
    Kumagai JA; Costa MT; Ezcurra E; Aburto-Oropeza O
    Ambio; 2020 Dec; 49(12):1992-2002. PubMed ID: 32279285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Risk to ecological resources following remediation can be due mainly to increased resource value of successful restoration: A case study from the Department of Energy's Hanford Site.
    Burger J; Gochfeld M; Kosson DS; Brown KG; Salisbury JA; Jeitner C
    Environ Res; 2020 Jul; 186():109536. PubMed ID: 32344209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Harnessing ecological theory to enhance ecosystem restoration.
    Silliman BR; Hensel MJS; Gibert JP; Daleo P; Smith CS; Wieczynski DJ; Angelini C; Paxton AB; Adler AM; Zhang YS; Altieri AH; Palmer TM; Jones HP; Gittman RK; Griffin JN; O'Connor MI; van de Koppel J; Poulsen JR; Rietkerk M; He Q; Bertness MD; van der Heide T; Valdez SR
    Curr Biol; 2024 May; 34(9):R418-R434. PubMed ID: 38714175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.