These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38708990)

  • 1. On the Defensive: Identity, Language, and Partisan Reactions to Political Scandal.
    Ekstrom PD; Gonzales MH; Williams AL; Weiner E; Aguilera R
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2024 May; ():1461672241247084. PubMed ID: 38708990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Judging scandal: Standards or bias in politics.
    Solomon ED; Hackathorn JM; Crittendon D
    J Soc Psychol; 2019; 159(1):61-74. PubMed ID: 29565221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Who sees which political falsehoods as more acceptable and why: A new look at in-group loyalty and trustworthiness.
    Galak J; Critcher CR
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2023 Mar; 124(3):593-619. PubMed ID: 35708929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The value of outside support for male and female politicians involved in a political sex scandal.
    Stewart DD; Rose RP; Rosales FM; Rudney PD; Lehner TA; Miltich G; Snyder C; Sadecki B
    J Soc Psychol; 2013; 153(3):375-94. PubMed ID: 23724705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Who polarizes Twitter? Ideological polarization, partisan groups and strategic networked campaigning on Twitter during the 2017 and 2021 German Federal elections 'Bundestagswahlen'.
    Darius P
    Soc Netw Anal Min; 2022; 12(1):151. PubMed ID: 36246430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Physiological responses and partisan bias: beyond self-reported measures of party identification.
    Petersen MB; Giessing A; Nielsen J
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0126922. PubMed ID: 26010527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Belief in the Utility of Cross-Partisan Empathy Reduces Partisan Animosity and Facilitates Political Persuasion.
    Santos LA; Voelkel JG; Willer R; Zaki J
    Psychol Sci; 2022 Sep; 33(9):1557-1573. PubMed ID: 36041234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Polarizing cues.
    Nicholson SP
    Am J Pol Sci; 2012; 56(1):52-66. PubMed ID: 22400143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Politics of Affirmation Theory: When Group-Affirmation Leads to Greater Ingroup Bias.
    Ehrlich GA; Gramzow RH
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Aug; 41(8):1110-22. PubMed ID: 26070859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exaggerated meta-perceptions predict intergroup hostility between American political partisans.
    Moore-Berg SL; Ankori-Karlinsky LO; Hameiri B; Bruneau E
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Jun; 117(26):14864-14872. PubMed ID: 32527858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Partisan self-interest is an important driver for people's support for the regulation of targeted political advertising.
    Baum K; Meissner S; Krasnova H
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0250506. PubMed ID: 33979358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The social media discourse of engaged partisans is toxic even when politics are irrelevant.
    Mamakos M; Finkel EJ
    PNAS Nexus; 2023 Oct; 2(10):pgad325. PubMed ID: 37869481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 'Action Not Words': The Conservative Party, Public Opinion and 'Scientific' Politics, c.1945-70.
    Lockwood C
    20 Century Br Hist; 2019 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 31236567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computational underpinnings of partisan information processing biases and associations with depth of cognitive reasoning.
    Derreumaux Y; Shamsian K; Hughes BL
    Cognition; 2023 Jan; 230():105304. PubMed ID: 36240612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceiving political polarization in the United States: party identity strength and attitude extremity exacerbate the perceived partisan divide.
    Westfall J; Van Boven L; Chambers JR; Judd CM
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2015 Mar; 10(2):145-58. PubMed ID: 25910386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mixed partisan households and electoral participation in the United States.
    Hersh E; Ghitza Y
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0203997. PubMed ID: 30303974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Motive attribution asymmetry for love vs. hate drives intractable conflict.
    Waytz A; Young LL; Ginges J
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Nov; 111(44):15687-92. PubMed ID: 25331879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Partisan-motivated sampling: Re-examining politically motivated reasoning across the information processing stream.
    Derreumaux Y; Bergh R; Hughes BL
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2022 Aug; 123(2):316-336. PubMed ID: 35420863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do political parties always prefer loyalists? Evidence from South Korea.
    Lee M; Ha SE; Lee W
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0291336. PubMed ID: 37917719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Psychological Barriers to Bipartisan Public Support for Climate Policy.
    Van Boven L; Ehret PJ; Sherman DK
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2018 Jul; 13(4):492-507. PubMed ID: 29961412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.