These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38709027)
1. Predictors of Plastic Surgery Applicant Success: An Analysis of the Texas STAR Database. Hallman TG; Qureshi U; Soltani H; Gutowski KS; Arcelona C; Donaldson R; Mihalic AP; Gosain AK J Craniofac Surg; 2024 Jun; 35(4):1084-1088. PubMed ID: 38709027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Unveiling the Need to Improve Personalized Applicant Tools: A Critical Evaluation of the Reliability of the Texas STAR database in Predicting Match Success for Plastic Surgery Applicants. Ewing JN; Gala Z; Lemdani MS; Crystal D; Broach RB; Azoury SC J Surg Educ; 2024 Sep; 81(9):1320-1330. PubMed ID: 39034224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Away Rotations and Matching in Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency: Applicant and Program Director Perspectives. Drolet BC; Brower JP; Lifchez SD; Janis JE; Liu PY Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Apr; 137(4):1337-1343. PubMed ID: 27018690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Applying to Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency Programs: Trends in the Past 5 Years of the Match. Tadisina KK; Orra S; Bassiri Gharb B; Kwiecien G; Bernard S; Zins JE Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Apr; 137(4):1344-1353. PubMed ID: 26761515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How Did Coronavirus-19 Impact the Expenses for Medical Students Applying to an Orthopaedic Surgery Residency in 2020 to 2021? Gordon AM; Conway CA; Sheth BK; Magruder ML; Vakharia RM; Levine WN; Razi AE Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Mar; 480(3):443-451. PubMed ID: 34913886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Integrated plastic surgery residency applicant survey: characteristics of successful applicants and feedback about the interview process. Rogers CR; Gutowski KA; Rio AM; Larson DL; Edwards M; Hansen JE; Lawrence WT; Stevenson TR; Bentz ML Plast Reconstr Surg; 2009 May; 123(5):1607-1617. PubMed ID: 19407635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preference Signaling and the Integrated Plastic Surgery Match: A National Survey Study. Sergesketter AR; Song E; Shammas RL; Tian WM; Eberlin KR; Ko JH; Momoh AO; Snyder-Warwick A; Phillips BT J Surg Educ; 2024 May; 81(5):662-670. PubMed ID: 38553367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of Predictors for Successful Residency Match in General Surgery. Iwai Y; Lenze NR; Becnel CM; Mihalic AP; Stitzenberg KB J Surg Educ; 2022; 79(3):579-586. PubMed ID: 34852956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcome analysis of factors impacting the plastic surgery match. Wood JS; David LR Ann Plast Surg; 2010 Jun; 64(6):770-4. PubMed ID: 20489406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An Updated View of the Integrated Plastic Surgery Match. Borsting EA; Chim JH; Thaller SR Ann Plast Surg; 2015 Nov; 75(5):556-9. PubMed ID: 26418789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the 2021 Otolaryngology Residency Match: Analysis of the Texas STAR Database. Lenze NR; Mihalic AP; Kovatch KJ; Thorne MC; Kupfer RA Laryngoscope; 2022 Jun; 132(6):1177-1183. PubMed ID: 34515992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Selection criteria for the integrated model of plastic surgery residency. LaGrasso JR; Kennedy DA; Hoehn JG; Ashruf S; Przybyla AM Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 Mar; 121(3):121e-125e. PubMed ID: 18317094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Underrepresented in Medicine Applicants are Less Likely to Successfully Match into Plastic Surgery. Oleru OO; Shamamian PE; Levy L; Gyasi A; Wang C; Seyidova N; Henderson PW J Surg Educ; 2024 Aug; 81(8):1066-1074. PubMed ID: 38806307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of the 1990-2007 neurosurgery residency match: does applicant gender affect neurosurgery match outcome? Durham SR; Donaldson K; Grady MS; Benzil DL J Neurosurg; 2018 Aug; 129(2):282-289. PubMed ID: 29882698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Closer Look at the 2013 to 2014 Integrated Plastic Surgery Match. Kling RE; Kling RR; Agi C; Toirac A; Manders EK Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Mar; 137(3):624e-629e. PubMed ID: 26910706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predictors of otolaryngology applicant success using the Texas STAR database. Lenze NR; Mihalic AP; DeMason CE; Shah RN; Buckmire RA; Thorp BD; Ebert CS; Zanation AM Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol; 2021 Apr; 6(2):188-194. PubMed ID: 33869750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ophthalmology Residency Match outcomes for 2011. Yousuf SJ; Jones LS Ophthalmology; 2012 Mar; 119(3):642-6. PubMed ID: 22218141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Applicant Characteristics Associated With Selection for Ranking at Independent Surgery Residency Programs. Dort JM; Trickey AW; Kallies KJ; Joshi AR; Sidwell RA; Jarman BT J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(6):e123-9. PubMed ID: 26073713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Independent Plastic Surgery Match (2010-2018): Applicant and Program Trends, Predictors of a Successful Match, and Future Directions. Azoury SC; Kozak GM; Stranix JT; Colen DL; Piwnica-Worms W; Fosnot J; Serletti JM; Kovach SJ J Surg Educ; 2020; 77(1):219-228. PubMed ID: 31405800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Update on the Selection Criteria of Plastic Surgery Residents: A Survey of Program Directors and Associate Program Directors. Asghari A; Hines E; Mocharnuk J; Leis A; Wang ED Ann Plast Surg; 2024 May; 92(5S Suppl 3):S327-S330. PubMed ID: 38369381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]