These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38709327)

  • 1. Illumination matters Part II: advanced comparative analysis of flexible ureteroscopes in a kidney model by PEARLS.
    Kwok JL; Panthier F; De Coninck V; Ventimiglia E; Barghouthy Y; Danilovic A; Smyth N; Brachlow J; Schmid FA; Poyet C; Eberli D; Traxer O; Keller EX
    World J Urol; 2024 May; 42(1):298. PubMed ID: 38709327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Illumination matters part I: comparative analysis of light sources and illumination in flexible ureteroscopy-fundamental findings from a PEARLS analysis.
    Kwok JL; De Coninck V; Corrales M; Sierra A; Panthier F; Ventimiglia E; Gauhar V; Schmid FA; Hunziker M; Poyet C; Eberli D; Traxer O; Keller EX
    World J Urol; 2024 May; 42(1):355. PubMed ID: 38796790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Illumination matters Part III: Impact of light obstruction on illuminance from flexible ureteroscopes - a comparative PEARLS analysis.
    Kwok JL; Ventimiglia E; De Coninck V; Sierra A; Panthier F; Corrales M; Barghouthy Y; Gauhar V; Kranzbühler B; Schmid FA; Poyet C; Eberli D; Traxer O; Keller EX
    World J Urol; 2024 Mar; 42(1):188. PubMed ID: 38520528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Illumination matters part IV: blackout and whiteout in flexible ureteroscopy - first report on a phenomenon observed by PEARLS.
    Kwok JL; De Coninck V; Panthier F; Kamkoum H; Pauchard F; Shrestha A; Gauhar V; Brachlow J; Schmid FA; Poyet C; Eberli D; Traxer O; Keller EX
    World J Urol; 2024 May; 42(1):294. PubMed ID: 38704777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In Vitro Evaluation of Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscopes: A Practical Comparison for a Patient-Centered Approach.
    Marchini GS; Batagello CA; Monga M; Torricelli FCM; Vicentini FC; Danilovic A; Srougi M; Nahas WC; Mazzucchi E
    J Endourol; 2018 Mar; 32(3):184-191. PubMed ID: 29239229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of single-use flexible ureteroscopes with a reusable ureteroscope for the management of paediatric urolithiasis.
    Mille E; El-Khoury E; Haddad M; Pinol J; Charbonnier M; Gastaldi P; Dariel A; Merrot T; Faure A
    J Pediatr Urol; 2023 Jun; 19(3):248.e1-248.e6. PubMed ID: 36746718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of a Novel Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscope.
    Dale J; Kaplan AG; Radvak D; Shin R; Ackerman A; Chen T; Scales CD; Ferrandino MN; Simmons WN; Preminger GM; Lipkin ME
    J Endourol; 2021 Jun; 35(6):903-907. PubMed ID: 27981862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Single-use disposable digital flexible ureteroscopes: an ex vivo assessment and cost analysis.
    Hennessey DB; Fojecki GL; Papa NP; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton D
    BJU Int; 2018 May; 121 Suppl 3():55-61. PubMed ID: 29656467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. First clinical evaluation of a flexible digital ureteroscope with direct in scope suctioning system (Pusen DISS 7.5Ch): prospective multicentric feasibility study.
    Nedbal C; Yuen SKK; Akram M; Keller EX; Martínez BB; Philip J; Emiliani E; Li JKM; Stracci D; Gauhar V; Castellani D; Somani BK
    World J Urol; 2024 Oct; 42(1):560. PubMed ID: 39361036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Current Disposable Ureteroscopes: Performance and Limitations in a Standardized Kidney Model.
    Schlager D; Obaid MA; Hein S; Wilhelm K; Schönthaler M; Gratzke C; Miernik A; Schoeb DS
    J Endourol; 2020 Oct; 34(10):1015-1020. PubMed ID: 32475165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Single use versus reusable digital flexible ureteroscopes: A prospective comparative study.
    Kam J; Yuminaga Y; Beattie K; Ling KY; Arianayagam M; Canagasingham B; Ferguson R; Varol C; Khadra M; Winter M; Ko R
    Int J Urol; 2019 Oct; 26(10):999-1005. PubMed ID: 31448473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Single-use versus reusable ureterorenoscopes for retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS): systematic comparative analysis of physical and optical properties in three different devices.
    Deininger S; Haberstock L; Kruck S; Neumann E; da Costa IA; Todenhöfer T; Bedke J; Stenzl A; Rausch S
    World J Urol; 2018 Dec; 36(12):2059-2063. PubMed ID: 29869701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Which Flexible Ureteroscopes (Digital vs. Fiber-Optic) Can Easily Reach the Difficult Lower Pole Calices and Have Better End-Tip Deflection: In Vitro Study on K-Box. A PETRA Evaluation.
    Dragos LB; Somani BK; Sener ET; Buttice S; Proietti S; Ploumidis A; Iacoboaie CT; Doizi S; Traxer O
    J Endourol; 2017 Jul; 31(7):630-637. PubMed ID: 28478744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Next-Generation Single-Use Ureteroscopes: An In Vitro Comparison.
    Tom WR; Wollin DA; Jiang R; Radvak D; Simmons WN; Preminger GM; Lipkin ME
    J Endourol; 2017 Dec; 31(12):1301-1306. PubMed ID: 28978227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro comparison of a disposable flexible ureteroscope and conventional flexible ureteroscopes.
    Boylu U; Oommen M; Thomas R; Lee BR
    J Urol; 2009 Nov; 182(5):2347-51. PubMed ID: 19758626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Carbon Footprint in Flexible Ureteroscopy: A Comparative Study on the Environmental Impact of Reusable and Single-Use Ureteroscopes.
    Davis NF; McGrath S; Quinlan M; Jack G; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton DM
    J Endourol; 2018 Mar; 32(3):214-217. PubMed ID: 29373918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Initial Experience with the New Super Thin Single-use Pusen Flexible Ureteroscope 7.5 Fr in Renal Stones Endoscopic Treatment.
    Geavlete B; Ene C; Iordache V; Geavlete P
    Chirurgia (Bucur); 2021; 116(3):354-360. PubMed ID: 34191717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of flexible ureteroscopes: deflection, irrigant flow and optical characteristics.
    Abdelshehid C; Ahlering MT; Chou D; Park HK; Basillote J; Lee D; Kim I; Eichel L; Protsenko D; Wong B; McDougall E; Clayman RV
    J Urol; 2005 Jun; 173(6):2017-21. PubMed ID: 15879808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stone size on endoscopic view as a predictor of successful stone retrieval during flexible ureteroscopy: an in vitro analysis.
    Randall JH; Carrera RV; Fletcher PJ; Duchene DA; Thurmon KL; Neff DA; Molina WR
    World J Urol; 2021 Sep; 39(9):3587-3591. PubMed ID: 33512571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ureteroscopy for stone treatment using new 270 degrees semiflexible endoscope: in vitro, ex vivo, and clinical application.
    Wendt-Nordahl G; Trojan L; Alken P; Michel MS; Knoll T
    J Endourol; 2007 Dec; 21(12):1439-44. PubMed ID: 18186680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.