129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38709418)
1. Correction: Impact of organised colorectal cancer screening on age-specific population incidences: evidence from a quasi-experimental study in Sweden.
Strand GC; Strömberg U; Forsberg A; Bonander C
Eur J Epidemiol; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38709418
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of organised colorectal cancer screening on age-specific population incidences: evidence from a quasi-experimental study in Sweden.
Chauca Strand G; Strömberg U; Forsberg A; Bonander C
Eur J Epidemiol; 2024 Jan; 39(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 38177571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Organised population-based programmes and change in socioeconomic inequalities in mammography screening: A 1992-2012 nationwide quasi-experimental study.
Cullati S; von Arx M; Courvoisier DS; Sandoval JL; Manor O; Burton-Jeangros C; Bouchardy C; Guessous I
Prev Med; 2018 Nov; 116():19-26. PubMed ID: 30145347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sociodemographic changes in the population frequency of colonoscopy following the implementation of organised bowel cancer screening: An analysis of data from Swedish registers, 2006-2015.
Thulin T; Strömberg U; Holmén A; Hultcrantz R; Forsberg A
J Med Screen; 2021 Sep; 28(3):244-251. PubMed ID: 32957834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Trends in mortality from cervical cancer in the Nordic countries: association with organised screening programmes.
Lăără E; Day NE; Hakama M
Lancet; 1987 May; 1(8544):1247-9. PubMed ID: 2884378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Population-Based Data Reveal Factors Associated with Organised and Non-Organised Colorectal Cancer Screening: An Important Step towards Improving Coverage.
Tran TN; Van Hal G; Peeters M; Jidkova S; De Schutter H; Hoeck S
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Aug; 18(16):. PubMed ID: 34444122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of organised programs on colorectal cancer screening.
Eisinger F; Cals L; Calazel-Benque A; Blay JY; Coscas Y; Dolbeault S; Namer M; Pivot X; Rixe O; Serin D; Roussel C; Morère JF;
BMC Cancer; 2008 Apr; 8():104. PubMed ID: 18412950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing the evidence for organised cancer screening programmes.
Madlensky L; Goel V; Polzer J; Ashbury FD
Eur J Cancer; 2003 Aug; 39(12):1648-53. PubMed ID: 12888358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of comorbid conditions on participation in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme: a cross-sectional study.
Guiriguet C; Pera G; Castells A; Toran P; Grau J; Rivero I; Buron A; Macià F; Vela-Vallespín C; Vilarrubí-Estrella M; Marzo-Castillejo M
BMC Cancer; 2017 Aug; 17(1):524. PubMed ID: 28784093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficiency of organised and opportunistic cytological screening for cancer in situ of the cervix.
Gustafsson L; Sparén P; Gustafsson M; Wilander E; Bergström R; Adami HO
Br J Cancer; 1995 Aug; 72(2):498-505. PubMed ID: 7640239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Potential global loss of life expected due to COVID-19 disruptions to organised colorectal cancer screening.
Worthington J; van Wifferen F; Sun Z; de Jonge L; Lew JB; Greuter MJE; van den Puttelaar R; Feletto E; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Coupé VMH; Ein Yong JH; Canfell K;
EClinicalMedicine; 2023 Aug; 62():102081. PubMed ID: 37538541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Impact of a Six-Year Existing Screening Programme Using the Faecal Immunochemical Test in Flanders (Belgium) on Colorectal Cancer Incidence, Mortality and Survival: A Population-Based Study.
Tran TN; Hoeck S; De Schutter H; Janssens S; Peeters M; Van Hal G
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Jan; 20(2):. PubMed ID: 36674409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The association between organised colorectal cancer screening strategies and reduction of its related mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ding H; Lin J; Xu Z; Wang HHX; Huang L; Huang J; Wong MCS
BMC Cancer; 2024 Mar; 24(1):365. PubMed ID: 38515013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using physician-linked mailed invitations in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme: effectiveness and factors associated with response.
Tinmouth J; Baxter NN; Paszat LF; Rabeneck L; Sutradhar R; Yun L
BMJ Open; 2014 Mar; 4(3):e004494. PubMed ID: 24622950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cervical cancer screening in Sweden.
Dillner J
Eur J Cancer; 2000 Nov; 36(17):2255-9. PubMed ID: 11072216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gender-specific cut-offs in colorectal cancer screening with FIT: Increased compliance and equal positivity rate.
Blom J; Löwbeer C; Elfström KM; Sventelius M; Öhman D; Saraste D; Törnberg S
J Med Screen; 2019 Jun; 26(2):92-97. PubMed ID: 30336730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Methods to increase participation in organised screening programs: a systematic review.
Camilloni L; Ferroni E; Cendales BJ; Pezzarossi A; Furnari G; Borgia P; Guasticchi G; Giorgi Rossi P;
BMC Public Health; 2013 May; 13():464. PubMed ID: 23663511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy in standard clinical practice of colonoscopic polypectomy in reducing colorectal cancer incidence.
Citarda F; Tomaselli G; Capocaccia R; Barcherini S; Crespi M;
Gut; 2001 Jun; 48(6):812-5. PubMed ID: 11358901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Excellent performance of Hemoccult Sensa in organised colorectal cancer screening.
Kershenbaum A; Flugelman A; Lejbkowicz F; Arad H; Rennert G
Eur J Cancer; 2013 Mar; 49(4):923-30. PubMed ID: 23099005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of an organised population screening programme for colorectal cancer: Measurement after first and second rounds.
Mar J; Arrospide A; Larrañaga I; Iruretagoiena ML; Imaz L; Gorostiza A; Ibarrondo O
J Med Screen; 2021 Jun; 28(2):122-130. PubMed ID: 32380931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
