These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Effect of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension on treatment failure in women with uterovaginal prolapse: 5-year results of a randomized clinical trial. Nager CW; Visco AG; Richter HE; Rardin CR; Komesu Y; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Paraiso MFR; Mazloomdoost D; Sridhar A; Thomas S; Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 225(2):153.e1-153.e31. PubMed ID: 33716071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Design of a Randomized Clinical Trial of Perioperative Vaginal Estrogen Versus Placebo With Transvaginal Native Tissue Apical Prolapse Repair (Investigation to Minimize Prolapse Recurrence of the Vagina using Estrogen: IMPROVE). Rahn DD; Richter HE; Sung VW; Larsen WI; Hynan LS Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Jan; 27(1):e227-e233. PubMed ID: 32541299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension vs Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation With or Without Perioperative Behavioral Therapy for Pelvic Organ Vaginal Prolapse on Surgical Outcomes and Prolapse Symptoms at 5 Years in the OPTIMAL Randomized Clinical Trial. Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Brubaker L; Norton P; Gantz M; Richter HE; Weidner A; Menefee S; Schaffer J; Pugh N; Meikle S; JAMA; 2018 Apr; 319(15):1554-1565. PubMed ID: 29677302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after sacrospinous hysteropexy or vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension. Schulten SF; Detollenaere RJ; IntHout J; Kluivers KB; Van Eijndhoven HW Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 227(2):252.e1-252.e9. PubMed ID: 35439530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Association between adjuvant posterior repair and success of native tissue apical suspension. Sutkin G; Zyczynski HM; Sridhar A; Jelovsek JE; Rardin CR; Mazloomdoost D; Rahn DD; Nguyen JN; Andy UU; Meyer I; Gantz MG; Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 222(2):161.e1-161.e8. PubMed ID: 31449806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Characteristics associated with composite surgical failure over 5 years of women in a randomized trial of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension. Richter HE; Sridhar A; Nager CW; Komesu YM; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Rardin C; Visco A; Mazloomdoost D; Thomas S; Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Jan; 228(1):63.e1-63.e16. PubMed ID: 35931131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial. Schulten SFM; Detollenaere RJ; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HWF BMJ; 2019 Sep; 366():l5149. PubMed ID: 31506252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of preoperative local estrogen in postmenopausal women with prolapse: a randomized trial. Rahn DD; Good MM; Roshanravan SM; Shi H; Schaffer JI; Singh RJ; Word RA J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 2014 Oct; 99(10):3728-36. PubMed ID: 24947034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of Vaginal Mesh Hysteropexy vs Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension on Treatment Failure in Women With Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Nager CW; Visco AG; Richter HE; Rardin CR; Rogers RG; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Paraiso MFR; Mazloomdoost D; Grey S; Sridhar A; Wallace D; JAMA; 2019 Sep; 322(11):1054-1065. PubMed ID: 31529008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction. Haj-Yahya R; Chill HH; Levin G; Reuveni-Salzman A; Shveiky D J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 30802607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pain and activity after vaginal reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. Barber MD; Brubaker L; Nygaard I; Wai CY; Dyer KY; Ellington D; Sridhar A; Gantz MG; Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 221(3):233.e1-233.e16. PubMed ID: 31201809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [A five-year analysis of effect on transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension with or without native-tissue repair for middle compartment defect]. Zhang YH; Lu YX; Liu X; Liu JX; Shen WJ; Zhao Y; Niu K; Wang WY Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jul; 54(7):445-451. PubMed ID: 31365956 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Subgroups of failure after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and associations with quality of life outcomes: a longitudinal cluster analysis. Jelovsek JE; Gantz MG; Lukacz ES; Zyczynski HM; Sridhar A; Kery C; Chew R; Harvie HS; Dunivan G; Schaffer J; Sung V; Varner RE; Mazloomdoost D; Barber MD; Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):504.e1-504.e22. PubMed ID: 34157280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]