These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38711135)
1. Comparison of quantitative whole body PET parameters on [ Ayati N; McIntosh L; Buteau J; Alipour R; Pudis M; Daw N; Jackson P; Hofman MS Cancer Imaging; 2024 May; 24(1):57. PubMed ID: 38711135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Changes of [ Liu Y; Gao MJ; Zhou J; Du F; Chen L; Huang ZK; Hu JB; Lou C BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Sep; 21(1):133. PubMed ID: 34530768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The value of Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction for improving lesion conspicuity of malignant lung tumors on Kurita Y; Ichikawa Y; Nakanishi T; Tomita Y; Hasegawa D; Murashima S; Hirano T; Sakuma H Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Apr; 34(4):272-279. PubMed ID: 32060780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation and Optimization of a New PET Reconstruction Algorithm, Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Reconstruction, for Lung Cancer Assessment According to Lesion Size. Otani T; Hosono M; Kanagaki M; Onishi Y; Matsubara N; Kawabata K; Kimura H AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Aug; 213(2):W50-W56. PubMed ID: 30995096 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Ordered subset expectation maximisation vs Bayesian penalised likelihood reconstruction algorithm in 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT. Witkowska-Patena E; Budzyńska A; Giżewska A; Dziuk M; Walęcka-Mazur A Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Mar; 34(3):192-199. PubMed ID: 31902120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development of a Visually Calculated SUV Swiha M; Papa N; Sabahi Z; Ayati N; John N; Pathmanandavel S; Crumbaker M; Li S; Agrawal S; Ayers M; Hickey A; Sharma S; Nguyen A; Emmett L J Nucl Med; 2024 Jun; 65(6):904-908. PubMed ID: 38637137 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlations between whole body volumetric parameters of Yildirim ÖA; Gündoğan C; Can C; Poyraz K; Erdur E; Kömek H Ann Nucl Med; 2021 May; 35(5):540-548. PubMed ID: 33586097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimizing scan time and bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm in copper-64 PET/CT imaging: a phantom study. Monsef A; Sheikhzadeh P; Steiner JR; Sadeghi F; Yazdani M; Ghafarian P Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2024 May; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 38608316 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Predictive factors of tumor sink effect: Insights from Tuncel M; Telli T; Tuncalı MÇ; Karabulut E Ann Nucl Med; 2021 May; 35(5):529-539. PubMed ID: 33586096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Determination of optimal regularization factor in Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction of brain PET images using [ Wagatsuma K; Miwa K; Kamitaka Y; Koike E; Yamao T; Yoshii T; Kobayashi R; Nezu S; Sugamata Y; Miyaji N; Imabayashi E; Ishibashi K; Toyohara J; Ishii K Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):2995-3005. PubMed ID: 35246870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Effect of Various β Values on Image Quality and Semiquantitative Measurements in 68Ga-RM2 and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI Images Reconstructed With a Block Sequential Regularized Expectation Maximization Algorithm. Baratto L; Duan H; Ferri V; Khalighi M; Iagaru A Clin Nucl Med; 2020 Jul; 45(7):506-513. PubMed ID: 32433170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of a Bayesian Penalized Likelihood PET Reconstruction Compared With Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization on Clinical Image Quality Over a Wide Range of Patient Weights. Chilcott AK; Bradley KM; McGowan DR AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jan; 210(1):153-157. PubMed ID: 29091008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of New Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Reconstruction Algorithm on Visualization and Quantification of Upper Abdominal Malignant Tumors in Clinical FDG PET/CT Examinations. Tatsumi M; Soeda F; Kamiya T; Ueda J; Katayama D; Matsunaga K; Watabe T; Kato H; Tomiyama N Front Oncol; 2021; 11():707023. PubMed ID: 34485143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bayesian penalized likelihood PET reconstruction impact on quantitative metrics in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Young JR; Mugu VK; Johnson GB; Ehman EC; Packard AT; Homb AC; Nathan MA; Thanarajasingam G; Kemp BJ Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Feb; 102(6):e32665. PubMed ID: 36820562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does a novel penalized likelihood reconstruction of 18F-FDG PET-CT improve signal-to-background in colorectal liver metastases? Parvizi N; Franklin JM; McGowan DR; Teoh EJ; Bradley KM; Gleeson FV Eur J Radiol; 2015 Oct; 84(10):1873-8. PubMed ID: 26163992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of total variation regularized expectation maximization reconstruction on the image quality of Yang FJ; Ai SY; Wu R; Lv Y; Xie HF; Dong Y; Meng QL; Wang F Br J Radiol; 2021 Apr; 94(1120):20201356. PubMed ID: 33571001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Regularized reconstruction of digital time-of-flight Lindström E; Velikyan I; Regula N; Alhuseinalkhudhur A; Sundin A; Sörensen J; Lubberink M Theranostics; 2019; 9(12):3476-3484. PubMed ID: 31281491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]