These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38711739)

  • 1. Video dataset containing video quality assessment scores obtained from standardized objective and subjective testing.
    Frnda J; Durica M; Lin JC; Fournier-Viger P
    Data Brief; 2024 Jun; 54():110458. PubMed ID: 38711739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of Packet Loss Rate on Quality of Compressed High Resolution Videos.
    Bienik J; Uhrina M; Sevcik L; Holesova A
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Mar; 23(5):. PubMed ID: 36904947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of Scene Content on High Resolution Video Quality.
    Uhrina M; Holesova A; Bienik J; Sevcik L
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Apr; 21(8):. PubMed ID: 33921877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Subjective Quality Assessment of V-PCC-Compressed Dynamic Point Clouds Degraded by Packet Losses.
    Dumic E; da Silva Cruz LA
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jun; 23(12):. PubMed ID: 37420788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the suitability of VMAF for quality assessment of medical videos: Medical ultrasound & wireless capsule endoscopy.
    Usman MA; Martini MG
    Comput Biol Med; 2019 Oct; 113():103383. PubMed ID: 31437625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Toward an impairment metric for stereoscopic video: a full-reference video quality metric to assess compressed stereoscopic video.
    De Silva V; Arachchi HK; Ekmekcioglu E; Kondoz A
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2013 Sep; 22(9):3392-404. PubMed ID: 23771337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. VMAF Oriented Perceptual Coding Based on Piecewise Metric Coupling.
    Luo Z; Zhu C; Huang Y; Xie R; Song L; Kuo CJ
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2021; 30():5109-5121. PubMed ID: 33989154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceptual video quality assessment in H.264 video coding standard using objective modeling.
    Karthikeyan R; Sainarayanan G; Deepa SN
    Springerplus; 2014; 3():174. PubMed ID: 24790819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Deep Learning Post-Filtering Using Multi-Head Attention and Multiresolution Feature Fusion for Image and Intra-Video Quality Enhancement.
    Schiopu I; Munteanu A
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Feb; 22(4):. PubMed ID: 35214252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the performance of video quality assessment metrics under different compression and packet loss scenarios.
    Martínez-Rach MO; Piñol P; López OM; Perez Malumbres M; Oliver J; Calafate CT
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():743604. PubMed ID: 24982988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Salient motion features for video quality assessment.
    Ćulibrk D; Mirković M; Zlokolica V; Pokrić M; Crnojević V; Kukolj D
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2011 Apr; 20(4):948-58. PubMed ID: 20876020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. CVD2014-A Database for Evaluating No-Reference Video Quality Assessment Algorithms.
    Nuutinen M; Virtanen T; Vaahteranoksa M; Vuori T; Oittinen P; Hakkinen J
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2016 Jul; 25(7):3073-86. PubMed ID: 27164589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Study of subjective and objective quality assessment of video.
    Seshadrinathan K; Soundararajan R; Bovik AC; Cormack LK
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2010 Jun; 19(6):1427-41. PubMed ID: 20129861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adaptive Reservation of Network Resources According to Video Classification Scenes.
    Sevcik L; Voznak M
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Mar; 21(6):. PubMed ID: 33802202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Atherosclerotic plaque ultrasound video encoding, wireless transmission, and quality assessment using H.264.
    Panayides A; Pattichis MS; Pattichis CS; Loizou CP; Pantziaris M; Pitsillides A
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2011 May; 15(3):387-97. PubMed ID: 21233053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Study of Subjective Quality and Objective Blind Quality Prediction of Stereoscopic Videos.
    Appina B; Dendi SVR; Manasa K; Channappayya SS; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2019 May; ():. PubMed ID: 31094690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. EEG-based classification of video quality perception using steady state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs).
    Acqualagna L; Bosse S; Porbadnigk AK; Curio G; Müller KR; Wiegand T; Blankertz B
    J Neural Eng; 2015 Apr; 12(2):026012. PubMed ID: 25768913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Binocular Rivalry Impact on Macroblock-Loss Error Concealment for Stereoscopic 3D Video Transmission.
    Hasan MM; Hossain MA; Alotaibi N; Arnold JF; Azad A
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Mar; 23(7):. PubMed ID: 37050665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Objective Video Quality Assessment Based on Machine Learning for Underwater Scientific Applications.
    Moreno-Roldán JM; Luque-Nieto MÁ; Poncela J; Otero P
    Sensors (Basel); 2017 Mar; 17(4):. PubMed ID: 28333123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A study on quality assessment for medical ultrasound video compressed via HEVC.
    Razaak M; Martini MG; Savino K
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2014 Sep; 18(5):1552-9. PubMed ID: 24893370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.