These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3871289)

  • 1. Interobserver discrepancies in distance measurements from lumbar spine CT scans.
    Beers GJ; Carter AP; Leiter BE; Tilak SP; Shah RR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1985 Feb; 144(2):395-8. PubMed ID: 3871289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Stenosis of vertebral and intervertebral canal in degenerative spondylolisthesis in the computerized-tomographic picture].
    Królewski J; Smereczyński A; Daniel B
    Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol; 1984; 49(4):357-62. PubMed ID: 6529924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lumbar spine: pretest predictability of CT findings.
    Giles DJ; Thomas RJ; Osborn AG; Clayton PD; Miller MH; Bahr AL; Frederick PR; O'Connor GD; Ostler D
    Radiology; 1984 Mar; 150(3):719-22. PubMed ID: 6695073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computed tomography of the lumbar spine.
    Chafetz N; Genant HK
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1983 Jan; 14(1):147-69. PubMed ID: 6219328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of body position, imaging plane, and observer on computed tomographic measurements of the lumbosacral intervertebral foraminal area in dogs.
    Higgins BM; Cripps PJ; Baker M; Moore L; Penrose FE; McConnell JF
    Am J Vet Res; 2011 Jul; 72(7):905-17. PubMed ID: 21728851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficacy of computed tomography in prediction of operability of L5/S1 foraminal stenosis using region of interest: A STROBE-compliant retrospective study.
    Shim DW; Lee BH; Seo J; Hong H; Shin SC; Kim HS
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Oct; 98(42):e17422. PubMed ID: 31626098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of distraction in improving the space available in the lumbar stenotic canal and foramen.
    Schlegel JD; Champine J; Taylor MS; Watson JT; Champine M; Schleusener RL; Savory KM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1994 Sep; 19(18):2041-7. PubMed ID: 7825043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Plain CT of the degenerative lumbar spine.
    Tallroth K
    Eur J Radiol; 1998 Jul; 27(3):206-13. PubMed ID: 9717636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Plain film assessment of spinal stenosis: method comparison with lumbar CT.
    Dailey EJ; Buehler MT
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1989 Jun; 12(3):192-9. PubMed ID: 2664062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Proper protocols key to CT of lumbar spine.
    Helms CA; Major NM
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1994 Nov; 16(11):118-21. PubMed ID: 10150898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The pathophysiology of degenerative disease of the lumbar spine.
    Yong-Hing K; Kirkaldy-Willis WH
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1983 Jul; 14(3):491-504. PubMed ID: 6346204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of multiplanar reconstruction in CT recognition of lumbar disk disease.
    Rosenthal DI; Stauffer AE; Davis KR; Ganott M; Taveras JM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Jul; 143(1):169-76. PubMed ID: 6610315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lumbar disc disease and stenosis.
    Gaskill MF; Lukin R; Wiot JG
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1991 Jul; 29(4):753-64. PubMed ID: 2063003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Quantitative evaluation, indications and value of computer tomography of the lumbar spine].
    Lackner K; Schroeder S; Köster O
    Rofo; 1982 Sep; 137(3):309-15. PubMed ID: 6216157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Degenerative changes of the vertebral column in spatial imaging of 3D computed tomography.
    Krupski W; Majcher P; Krupski M; Fatyga M; Złomaniec J
    Ann Univ Mariae Curie Sklodowska Med; 2002; 57(1):459-65. PubMed ID: 12898961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Normal and degenerative posterior spinal structures: MR imaging.
    Grenier N; Kressel HY; Schiebler ML; Grossman RI; Dalinka MK
    Radiology; 1987 Nov; 165(2):517-25. PubMed ID: 3659376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of body position and clinical signs on L7-S1 intervertebral foraminal area and lumbosacral angle in dogs with lumbosacral disease as measured via computed tomography.
    Jones JC; Davies SE; Werre SR; Shackelford KL
    Am J Vet Res; 2008 Nov; 69(11):1446-54. PubMed ID: 18980426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The value of computerized tomography in determining lumbar facet joint orientation.
    Gunzburg R; Sandhu A; Fraser RD
    J Spinal Disord; 1989 Sep; 2(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 2520072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. High-resolution CT scanning of the lumbar spine. Technique and anatomy.
    Lau LS; Slonim L; Kiss ZS; Morris C; Beynon J
    Med J Aust; 1983 Jul; 2(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 6223202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. CT of lumbar spine disk herniation: correlation with surgical findings.
    Firooznia H; Benjamin V; Kricheff II; Rafii M; Golimbu C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Mar; 142(3):587-92. PubMed ID: 6607651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.