These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38713883)

  • 1. Efficacy of a New Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler on Nasolabial Folds Correction: A Prospective, Comparative, Double-Blinded Clinical Trial.
    Lheritier C; Converset S; Rzany BJ; Cartier H; Ascher B
    Dermatol Surg; 2024 Aug; 50(8):746-751. PubMed ID: 38713883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A multi-center comparative efficacy and safety study of two different hyaluronic acid fillers for treatment of nasolabial folds in a Chinese population.
    Li D; Sun J; Wu S
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2019 Jun; 18(3):755-761. PubMed ID: 31074161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A 52-week follow-up, multi-center, randomized, double-blinded comparison of efficacy and safety of two hyaluronic acid fillers for the treatment of moderate-to-severe nasolabial folds in Chinese population.
    Shao H; Wang L; Tang J; Chen L; Zhang S; Chen Q; Wang C; Yang J; Li W; Zhao H
    J Dermatolog Treat; 2024 Dec; 35(1):2378165. PubMed ID: 39004426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficacy and safety of two hyaluronic acid fillers with different injection depths for the correction of moderate-to-severe nasolabial folds: A 52-week, prospective, randomized, double-blinded study in a Chinese population.
    Hu Y; Liu Z; Wang Y; Yu Q; Gong Y; Diao H; Jin Y; Zhang S; Shi Y
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2022 Mar; 21(3):940-948. PubMed ID: 35020250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficacy and Safety of Two Resilient Hyaluronic Acid Fillers in the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Nasolabial Folds: A 64-Week, Prospective, Multicenter, Controlled, Randomized, Double-Blinded, and Within-Subject Study.
    Monheit G; Kaufman-Janette J; Joseph JH; Shamban A; Dover JS; Smith S
    Dermatol Surg; 2020 Dec; 46(12):1521-1529. PubMed ID: 32217842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Split-Face, Comparative Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of DKL23 and Juvéderm Volift for Correcting Moderate-to-Severe Nasolabial Folds.
    Alimohammadi M; Furman-Assaf S; Nilsson J
    Aesthet Surg J; 2024 Oct; 44(11):1218-1226. PubMed ID: 38874166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Efficacy and Safety of Lidocaine-Containing Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler for Treatment of Nasolabial Folds: A Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Study.
    Choi WJ; Han SW; Kim JE; Kim HW; Kim MB; Kang H
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2015 Dec; 39(6):953-62. PubMed ID: 26493557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new monophasic hyaluronic acid filler with lidocaine 0.3% in the correction of nasolabial fold.
    Suh JH; Oh CT; Im SI; Lim JS; Kim BJ; Lee JH
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2017 Sep; 16(3):327-332. PubMed ID: 28145073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A randomized, multicenter study on a flexible hyaluronic acid filler in treatment of moderate-to-severe nasolabial folds in a Chinese population.
    Xie Y; Wu W; Xu J; Wang X; Hu Z; Li Q
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2022 Oct; 21(10):4288-4293. PubMed ID: 35279948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A randomized, prospective, blinded, split-face, single-center study comparing polycaprolactone to hyaluronic acid for treatment of nasolabial folds.
    Galadari H; van Abel D; Al Nuami K; Al Faresi F; Galadari I
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2015 Mar; 14(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 25564797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The efficacy and safety of BM-PHA for the correction of nasolabial folds: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, split-face clinical trial.
    Paik SH; Choi ME; Lee WJ; Chang SE; Lee MW; Choi JH; Kim BJ; Won CH
    J Dermatolog Treat; 2021 Feb; 32(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 31195857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Multicenter, Double-Blinded, Randomized, Split-Face Study of the Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Hyaluronic Acid Gel for the Correction of Nasolabial Folds.
    Gold MH; Baumann LS; Clark CP; Schlessinger J
    J Drugs Dermatol; 2018 Jan; 17(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 29320589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical comparison between two hyaluronic acid-derived fillers in the treatment of nasolabial folds in Chinese subjects: BioHyalux versus Restylane.
    Wu Y; Sun N; Xu Y; Liu H; Zhong S; Chen L; Li D
    Arch Dermatol Res; 2016 Apr; 308(3):145-51. PubMed ID: 26924549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Single-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of a New Monophasic Hyaluronic Acid Filler and Biphasic Filler in Correcting Nasolabial Fold.
    Chung C; Lee JH
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2021 Dec; 45(6):2902-2908. PubMed ID: 33851255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A randomized, split-face, double-blind, comparative study of the safety and efficacy of small- and large-particle hyaluronic acid fillers for the treatment of nasolabial folds.
    Nikolis A; Enright KM; Öhrlund Å; Winlöf P; Cotofana S
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2021 May; 20(5):1450-1458. PubMed ID: 32779375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The efficacy and safety of a monophasic hyaluronic acid filler in the correction of nasolabial folds: A randomized, multicenter, single blinded, split-face study.
    Kwon HJ; Ko EJ; Choi SY; Choi EJ; Jang YJ; Kim BJ; Lee YW
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2018 Aug; 17(4):584-589. PubMed ID: 28913927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficacy and Safety of 3 New Resilient Hyaluronic Acid Fillers, Crosslinked With Decreased BDDE, for the Treatment of Dynamic Wrinkles: Results of an 18-Month, Randomized Controlled Trial Versus Already Available Comparators.
    Rzany B; Converset-Viethel S; Hartmann M; Larrouy JC; Ribé N; Sito G; Noize-Pin C
    Dermatol Surg; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1304-1314. PubMed ID: 31343447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An 18-Month Follow-up, Randomized Comparison of Effectiveness and Safety of Two Hyaluronic Acid Fillers for Treatment of Moderate Nasolabial Folds.
    Rzany B; Bayerl C; Bodokh I; Boineau D; Dirschka T; Queille-Roussel C; Sebastian M; Sommer B; Edwartz C; Podda M
    Dermatol Surg; 2017 Jan; 43(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 27673483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of 2.5% agarose gel vs hyaluronic acid filler, for the correction of moderate to severe nasolabial folds.
    Scuderi N; Fanelli B; Fino P; Kinney BM
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2021 May; 20(5):1512-1519. PubMed ID: 33533155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reduced pain with injection of hyaluronic acid with pre-incorporated lidocaine for nasolabial fold correction: A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, active-controlled, split-face designed, clinical study.
    Choi SY; Han HS; Yoo KH; Lee JS; Kim BJ; Lee YW
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2020 Dec; 19(12):3229-3233. PubMed ID: 32416026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.