120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38714180)
1. Surface dose measurement and comparison between TLD and OSLD during modified re constructive mastectomy irradiation.
K E R; Krishnan M
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2024 May; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 38714180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Angular dependence of the TL and OSL dosimeters in the clinical 6 MV photon Beam.
Ratheesh KE; Mayakannan K
Appl Radiat Isot; 2023 Dec; 202():111073. PubMed ID: 37890243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Remote auditing of radiotherapy facilities using optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters.
Lye J; Dunn L; Kenny J; Lehmann J; Kron T; Oliver C; Butler D; Alves A; Johnston P; Franich R; Williams I
Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):032102. PubMed ID: 24593737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. SU-E-T-86: Development and Implementation of the Use of Optically Stimulated Luminescent Detectors in the Radiological Physics Center Anthropomorphic Quality Assurance Phantoms.
Bergene J; Kry S; Molineu A; Bellezza D; Court L; Alvarez P; Johnson V; Followill D
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part11):3722. PubMed ID: 28517125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. AAPM TG 191: Clinical use of luminescent dosimeters: TLDs and OSLDs.
Kry SF; Alvarez P; Cygler JE; DeWerd LA; Howell RM; Meeks S; O'Daniel J; Reft C; Sawakuchi G; Yukihara EG; Mihailidis D
Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 47(2):e19-e51. PubMed ID: 31574174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Verification using in vivo optically stimulated luminescent dosimetry of the predicted skin surface dose in patients receiving postmastectomy radiotherapy.
Wake JR; Chen FQ; Ashworth S; Byth K; Wang W; Stuart KE
Med Dosim; 2021 Summer; 46(2):e1-e6. PubMed ID: 33941320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characterization of an optically stimulated dosimeter for dentomaxillofacial dosimetry.
Valiyaparambil JV; Mallya SM
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Dec; 112(6):793-7. PubMed ID: 21983291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. TLD and OSLD dosimetry systems for remote audits of radiotherapy external beam calibration.
Alvarez P; Kry SF; Stingo F; Followill D
Radiat Meas; 2017 Nov; 106():412-415. PubMed ID: 29230093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of OSLD and a treatment planning system for surface dose determination in IMRT treatments.
Zhuang AH; Olch AJ
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081720. PubMed ID: 25086530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On the Use of Optically Stimulated Luminescent Dosimeter for Surface Dose Measurement during Radiotherapy.
Yusof FH; Ung NM; Wong JH; Jong WL; Ath V; Phua VC; Heng SP; Ng KH
PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0128544. PubMed ID: 26052690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative study for surface dose evaluation in conventional treatment of carcinoma breast patients irradiated with Co-60 and 6 MV radiation beam.
Singh R; Oinam AS; Trivedi G; Kainth HS; Shahi JS; Singh B; Kapoor R
J Cancer Res Ther; 2019; 15(5):1035-1041. PubMed ID: 31603107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measurement of surface dose in an MR-Linac with optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters for IMRT beam geometries.
Lim-Reinders S; Keller BM; Sahgal A; Chugh B; Kim A
Med Phys; 2020 Jul; 47(7):3133-3142. PubMed ID: 32302010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Angular dependence of the response of the nanoDot OSLD system for measurements at depth in clinical megavoltage beams.
Lehmann J; Dunn L; Lye JE; Kenny JW; Alves AD; Cole A; Asena A; Kron T; Williams IM
Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061712. PubMed ID: 24877807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimating dose to implantable cardioverter-defibrillator outside the treatment fields using a skin QED diode, optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters, and LiF thermoluminescent dosimeters.
Chan MF; Song Y; Dauer LT; Li J; Huang D; Burman C
Med Dosim; 2012; 37(3):334-8. PubMed ID: 22296877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dosimetry around metallic ports in tissue expanders in patients receiving postmastectomy radiation therapy: an ex vivo evaluation.
Moni J; Graves-Ditman M; Cederna P; Griffith K; Krueger EA; Fraass BA; Pierce LJ
Med Dosim; 2004; 29(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 15023393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of fetal dose using Optically Simulated Luminescence Dosimeter and ion chamber in randophantom for various radiotherapy techniques.
Sushma N; Kaginelli S; Sathiyaraj P; Senthil Manikandan P; Ganesh KM
Appl Radiat Isot; 2023 Aug; 198():110854. PubMed ID: 37209491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characteristics of an OSLD in the diagnostic energy range.
Al-Senan RM; Hatab MR
Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38(7):4396-405. PubMed ID: 21859040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dosimetry of MammoSite® applicator: comparison between Monte Carlo simulation, measurements, and treatment planning calculation.
Oshaghi M; Sadeghi M; Mahdavi SR; Shirazi A
J Cancer Res Ther; 2013; 9(2):224-9. PubMed ID: 23771363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter for exit dose
Ponmalar R; Manickam R; Saminathan S; Ganesh KM; Raman A; Godson HF
J Cancer Res Ther; 2018; 14(6):1341-1349. PubMed ID: 30488854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter and radiophotoliminescent glass dosimeter for dose measurement in dual-source dual-energy computed tomography.
Hirosawa A; Matsubara K; Morioka Y; Kitagawa M; Chusin T; Takemura A
Phys Eng Sci Med; 2021 Dec; 44(4):1311-1319. PubMed ID: 34665388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
