118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3871420)
21. Contact sensitivity and the DNA response in mice to high and low doses of oxazolone: low dose unresponsiveness following painting and feeding and its prevention by pretreatment with cyclophosphamide.
Asherson GL; Perera MA; Thomas WR
Immunology; 1979 Mar; 36(3):449-59. PubMed ID: 312260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Generation of anti-hapten T cell cytotoxicity in vivo. Relationship to contact sensitivity and the role of contrasuppression.
Ptak W; Friedman AM; Flood PM
Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 1994; 42(3):185-92. PubMed ID: 7487350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Characterization of two different Ly-1+ T cell populations that mediate delayed-type hypersensitivity.
Van Loveren H; Kato K; Meade R; Green DR; Horowitz M; Ptak W; Askenase PW
J Immunol; 1984 Nov; 133(5):2402-11. PubMed ID: 6332850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Suppressor cells in antigenic competition in contact allergy in mice.
Nakano K; Nakano Y
Immunology; 1978 Jun; 34(6):981-7. PubMed ID: 308039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Residual immunogenicity of irradiated spleen cell suspensions after a single intravenous injection of sheep red blood cells in mice.
Lagrange PH; Hurtrel B; Michel JC
Ann Immunol (Paris); 1980; 131D(2):137-51. PubMed ID: 6970541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Induction of macrophage TNF alpha, IL-1, IL-6, and PGE2 production by DTH-initiating factors.
Ferreri NR; Millet I; Paliwal V; Herzog W; Solomon D; Ramabhadran R; Askenase PW
Cell Immunol; 1991 Oct; 137(2):389-405. PubMed ID: 1893406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Fine-specificity of the immune response to oxazolone. I. Contact sensitivity and early antibodies.
Ferreira AM; Hurme M; Kaartinen M; Mäkelä O
J Immunol; 1981 Dec; 127(6):2366-71. PubMed ID: 7299129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Studies of contact hypersensitivity and tolerance in vivo and in vitro. I. Basic characteristics of the reactions and confirmation of an immune response in tolerant mice.
Noonan FP; Halliday WJ
Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol; 1978; 56(6):523-32. PubMed ID: 631921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. H-2-dependent cell-mediated immunity in vivo: delayed-type hypersensitivity and contact sensitization induced by fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated cells.
Domoto DT; Askenase PW
J Immunol; 1980 Nov; 125(5):2161-6. PubMed ID: 7430623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Suppressor T cells which block the induction of cytotoxic T cells in vivo.
Tagart VB; Thomas WR; Asherson GL
Immunology; 1978 Jun; 34(6):1109-16. PubMed ID: 308038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Delayed-type hypersensitivity is mediated by a sequence of two different T cell activities.
Van Loveren H; Askenase PW
J Immunol; 1984 Nov; 133(5):2397-401. PubMed ID: 6332849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The role of the macrophage as the stimulator cell in contact sensitivity.
Thomas DW; Forni G; Shevach EM; Green I
J Immunol; 1977 May; 118(5):1677-81. PubMed ID: 300756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. N,N'-Diacetyl-L-cystine-the disulfide dimer of N-acetylcysteine-is a potent modulator of contact sensitivity/delayed type hypersensitivity reactions in rodents.
Särnstrand B; Jansson AH; Matuseviciene G; Scheynius A; Pierrou S; Bergstrand H
J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1999 Mar; 288(3):1174-84. PubMed ID: 10027856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The induction of tolerance to DNFB contact sensitivity by using hapten-modified lymphoid cells. III. Effects of hapten concentration on the ability of MLS-disparate cells to induce rapid unresponsiveness.
Conlon PJ; Miller SD; Claman HN
J Immunol; 1980 Aug; 125(2):807-13. PubMed ID: 6156215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Three cell subsets are required for the transfer of delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction by antigen-specific T cell lines.
Salerno A; Dieli F; Sireci G; Bellavia A; Colizzi V; Ptak W; Asherson GL
Cell Immunol; 1997 Feb; 175(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 9023421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Suppressor cell induction in vitro. II. Cellular requirements of suppressor cell induction.
Feldmann M; Kontiainen S
Eur J Immunol; 1976 Apr; 6(4):302-5. PubMed ID: 1086779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Impairment of contrasuppressor activity in mice infected with the paramyxovirus of Newcastle disease.
Dieli F; Colonna Romano G; Zingone D; Salerno A
Immunology; 1992 Feb; 75(2):245-9. PubMed ID: 1551687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. TNP-specific Lyt-2+ cytolytic T cell clones preferentially respond to TNP-conjugated epidermal cells.
Shimada S; Katz SI
J Immunol; 1985 Sep; 135(3):1558-63. PubMed ID: 3874901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Suppressor T cell circuits in contact sensitivity. II. Induction and characterization of an efferent-acting, antigen-specific, H-2-restricted, monoclonal T cell hybrid-derived suppressor factor specific for DNFB contact hypersensitivity.
Miller SD
J Immunol; 1984 Dec; 133(6):3112-20. PubMed ID: 6208271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. B cells are not required for T cell priming in low zone tolerance to contact allergens and contact hypersensitivity.
Seidel-Guyenot W; Alt R; Perschon S; Knop J; Steinbrink K
Eur J Immunol; 2004 Nov; 34(11):3082-90. PubMed ID: 15376190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
