These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38714304)

  • 41. Clinical assessment of motor imagery after stroke.
    Malouin F; Richards CL; Durand A; Doyon J
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2008; 22(4):330-40. PubMed ID: 18326057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Does sonification of action simulation training impact corticospinal excitability and audiomotor plasticity?
    Castro F; Osman L; Di Pino G; Vuckovic A; Nowicky A; Bishop D
    Exp Brain Res; 2021 May; 239(5):1489-1505. PubMed ID: 33683403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Action observation plus motor imagery and somatosensory discrimination training are effective non-motor approaches to improve manual dexterity.
    Agnelli M; Libeccio B; Frisoni MC; Bolzoni F; Temporiti F; Gatti R
    J Hand Ther; 2024; 37(1):94-100. PubMed ID: 37580196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Age differences in the relationship between visual movement imagery and performance on kinesthetic acuity tests.
    Livesey DJ
    Dev Psychol; 2002 Mar; 38(2):279-87. PubMed ID: 11881762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Vividness and accuracy: Two independent aspects of motor imagery.
    Mizuguchi N; Suezawa M; Kanosue K
    Neurosci Res; 2019 Oct; 147():17-25. PubMed ID: 30605697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Age and gender differences in motor imagery.
    Subirats L; Allali G; Briansoulet M; Salle JY; Perrochon A
    J Neurol Sci; 2018 Aug; 391():114-117. PubMed ID: 30103958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Motor imagery training: Kinesthetic imagery strategy and inferior parietal fMRI activation.
    Lebon F; Horn U; Domin M; Lotze M
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2018 Apr; 39(4):1805-1813. PubMed ID: 29322583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Combined action observation and motor imagery facilitates visuomotor adaptation in children with developmental coordination disorder.
    Marshall B; Wright DJ; Holmes PS; Williams J; Wood G
    Res Dev Disabil; 2020 Mar; 98():103570. PubMed ID: 31918039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Muscle-specific movement-phase-dependent modulation of corticospinal excitability during upper-limb motor execution and motor imagery combined with virtual action observation.
    Suzuki Y; Kaneko N; Sasaki A; Tanaka F; Nakazawa K; Nomura T; Milosevic M
    Neurosci Lett; 2021 Jun; 755():135907. PubMed ID: 33887382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Subjective vividness of motor imagery has a neural signature in human premotor and parietal cortex.
    Zabicki A; de Haas B; Zentgraf K; Stark R; Munzert J; Krüger B
    Neuroimage; 2019 Aug; 197():273-283. PubMed ID: 31051294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Sensory features of mental images in the framework of human actions.
    Krüger B; Zabicki A; Grosse L; Naumann T; Munzert J
    Conscious Cogn; 2020 Aug; 83():102970. PubMed ID: 32540626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Motor imagery combined with action observation training optimized for individual motor skills further improves motor skills close to a plateau.
    Aoyama T; Kaneko F; Kohno Y
    Hum Mov Sci; 2020 Oct; 73():102683. PubMed ID: 32949991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Layered stimulus response training improves motor imagery ability and movement execution.
    Williams SE; Cooley SJ; Cumming J
    J Sport Exerc Psychol; 2013 Feb; 35(1):60-71. PubMed ID: 23404880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Tongue and mouth imagery questionnaire (TMIQ) for assessing motor imagery vividness of the temporomandibular region: A reliability and validity case-control study.
    Alvarado C; Arminjon A; Damieux-Verdeaux C; Lhotte C; Condemine C; Mateo S
    J Oral Rehabil; 2022 Apr; 49(4):381-390. PubMed ID: 35108417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Convergent validity and sex invariant factor structure of the Movement Imagery Questionnaire-3 - Second version (MIQ-3S): Healthy, young adult reference data.
    Monsma EV; Gregg MJ; Seiler B; Sacko RS; Hall CR
    Musculoskelet Sci Pract; 2022 Jun; 59():102537. PubMed ID: 35219223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Assessing vividness of mental imagery: The Plymouth Sensory Imagery Questionnaire.
    Andrade J; May J; Deeprose C; Baugh SJ; Ganis G
    Br J Psychol; 2014 Nov; 105(4):547-63. PubMed ID: 24117327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Potential benefits of synchronous action observation and motor imagery: a commentary on Eaves et al. 2022.
    Azaad S; Sebanz N
    Psychol Res; 2024 Sep; 88(6):1908-1910. PubMed ID: 37947875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Two assessments to evaluate imagery ability: translation, test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of the German KVIQ and Imaprax.
    Schuster C; Lussi A; Wirth B; Ettlin T
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Aug; 12():127. PubMed ID: 22905778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Consistent under-reporting of task details in motor imagery research.
    Van Caenegem EE; Hamoline G; Waltzing BM; Hardwick RM
    Neuropsychologia; 2022 Dec; 177():108425. PubMed ID: 36400244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Internal consistency and construct validity of two versions of the Revised Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire.
    Campos A
    Percept Mot Skills; 2011 Oct; 113(2):454-60. PubMed ID: 22185060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.