These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38714748)
1. Objective numeracy exacerbates framing effects from decision-making under political risk. Fitz EB; Stecuła DA; Hitt MP; Saunders KL Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):10473. PubMed ID: 38714748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Framing effects and risk-sensitive decision making. Mishra S; Gregson M; Lalumière ML Br J Psychol; 2012 Feb; 103(1):83-97. PubMed ID: 22229776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The moderating role of objective and subjective numeracy in attribute framing. Gamliel E; Kreiner H; Garcia-Retamero R Int J Psychol; 2016 Apr; 51(2):109-16. PubMed ID: 25640471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Beyond gains and losses: the effect of need on risky choice in framed decisions. Mishra S; Fiddick L J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 Jun; 102(6):1136-47. PubMed ID: 22486678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. "Thinking about numbers is not my idea of fun": need for cognition mediates age differences in numeracy performance. Bruine de Bruin W; McNair SJ; Taylor AL; Summers B; Strough J Med Decis Making; 2015 Jan; 35(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 25035261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Health numeracy in Japan: measures of basic numeracy account for framing bias in a highly numerate population. Okamoto M; Kyutoku Y; Sawada M; Clowney L; Watanabe E; Dan I; Kawamoto K BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2012 Sep; 12():104. PubMed ID: 22967200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Thinking Fast Increases Framing Effects in Risky Decision Making. Guo L; Trueblood JS; Diederich A Psychol Sci; 2017 Apr; 28(4):530-543. PubMed ID: 28406376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making. Reyna VF; Nelson WL; Han PK; Dieckmann NF Psychol Bull; 2009 Nov; 135(6):943-73. PubMed ID: 19883143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Using a familiar risk comparison within a risk ladder to improve risk understanding by low numerates: a study of visual attention. Keller C Risk Anal; 2011 Jul; 31(7):1043-54. PubMed ID: 21284684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of context on risk taking and decision times in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Sip KE; Muratore AF; Stern ER J Psychiatr Res; 2016 Apr; 75():82-90. PubMed ID: 26828371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Age, Loss Minimization, and the Role of Probability for Decision-Making. Best R; Freund AM Gerontology; 2018; 64(5):475-484. PubMed ID: 29621760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Framing Bias in the Interpretation of Quality Improvement Data: Evidence From an Experiment. Ballard A Int J Health Policy Manag; 2019 May; 8(5):307-314. PubMed ID: 31204447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An information processing view of framing effects: the role of causal schemas in decision making. Jou J; Shanteau J; Harris RJ Mem Cognit; 1996 Jan; 24(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 8822154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Betting on DBS: Effects of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation on risk taking and decision making in patients with Parkinson's disease. Brandt J; Rogerson M; Al-Joudi H; Reckess G; Shpritz B; Umeh CC; Aljehani N; Mills K; Mari Z Neuropsychology; 2015 Jul; 29(4):622-631. PubMed ID: 25486385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Framing effects in group investment decision making: role of group polarization. Cheng PY; Chiou WB Psychol Rep; 2008 Feb; 102(1):283-92. PubMed ID: 18481688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Numeracy and framing bias in epilepsy. Choi H; Wong JB; Mendiratta A; Heiman GA; Hamberger MJ Epilepsy Behav; 2011 Jan; 20(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 21059486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Asymmetric valuation of gains and losses in effort-based decision making. O'Brien MK; Ahmed AA PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223268. PubMed ID: 31613891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Framing From Experience: Cognitive Processes and Predictions of Risky Choice. Gonzalez C; Mehlhorn K Cogn Sci; 2016 Jul; 40(5):1163-91. PubMed ID: 27427284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Decision-making in Orthopaedic Oncology: Does Cognitive Bias Affect a Virtual Patient's Choice Between Limb Salvage and Amputation? Gurich RW; Cizik AM; Punt SE; Namekata M; Johnson CN; Symons RG; Brewer EG; Thompson MJ Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Mar; 478(3):506-514. PubMed ID: 31173578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]