These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38716167)

  • 1. Comparison of qPCR and metabarcoding for environmental DNA surveillance of a freshwater parasite.
    Johnson M; Tetzlaff S; Katz A; Sperry J
    Ecol Evol; 2024 May; 14(5):e11382. PubMed ID: 38716167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Needle in a haystack? A comparison of eDNA metabarcoding and targeted qPCR for detection of the great crested newt (
    Harper LR; Lawson Handley L; Hahn C; Boonham N; Rees HC; Gough KC; Lewis E; Adams IP; Brotherton P; Phillips S; Hänfling B
    Ecol Evol; 2018 Jun; 8(12):6330-6341. PubMed ID: 29988445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multispecies models reveal that eDNA metabarcoding is more sensitive than backpack electrofishing for conducting fish surveys in freshwater streams.
    McColl-Gausden EF; Weeks AR; Coleman RA; Robinson KL; Song S; Raadik TA; Tingley R
    Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):3111-3126. PubMed ID: 32966639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Environmental DNA metabarcoding of water samples as a tool for monitoring Iberian freshwater fish composition.
    Corral-Lou A; Doadrio I
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0283088. PubMed ID: 37903086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Environmental DNA metabarcoding of lake fish communities reflects long-term data from established survey methods.
    Hänfling B; Lawson Handley L; Read DS; Hahn C; Li J; Nichols P; Blackman RC; Oliver A; Winfield IJ
    Mol Ecol; 2016 Jul; 25(13):3101-19. PubMed ID: 27095076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Environmental DNA metabarcoding of freshwater fish in Malaysian tropical rivers using short-read nanopore sequencing as a potential biomonitoring tool.
    Munian K; Ramli FF; Othman N; Mahyudin NAA; Sariyati NH; Abdullah-Fauzi NAF; Haris H; Ilham-Norhakim ML; Abdul-Latiff MAB
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2024 May; 24(4):e13936. PubMed ID: 38419264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Integrating eDNA metabarcoding and simultaneous underwater visual surveys to describe complex fish communities in a marine biodiversity hotspot.
    Valdivia-Carrillo T; Rocha-Olivares A; Reyes-Bonilla H; Domínguez-Contreras JF; Munguia-Vega A
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2021 Jul; 21(5):1558-1574. PubMed ID: 33683812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the impact of the threatened crucian carp (Carassius carassius) on pond invertebrate diversity: A comparison of conventional and molecular tools.
    Harper LR; Lawson Handley L; Sayer CD; Read DS; Benucci M; Blackman RC; Hill MJ; Hänfling B
    Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):3252-3269. PubMed ID: 33002225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative analysis of fish environmental DNA reveals higher sensitivity achieved through targeted sequence-based metabarcoding.
    McCarthy A; Rajabi H; McClenaghan B; Fahner NA; Porter E; Singer GAC; Hajibabaei M
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2023 Apr; 23(3):581-591. PubMed ID: 36366953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of stream macroinvertebrate communities with eDNA is not congruent with tissue-based metabarcoding.
    Gleason JE; Elbrecht V; Braukmann TWA; Hanner RH; Cottenie K
    Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):3239-3251. PubMed ID: 32799390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of environmental DNA and bulk-sample metabarcoding using highly degenerate cytochrome c oxidase I primers.
    Macher JN; Vivancos A; Piggott JJ; Centeno FC; Matthaei CD; Leese F
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2018 Nov; 18(6):1456-1468. PubMed ID: 30129704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Environmental DNA metabarcoding for fish community analysis in backwater lakes: A comparison of capture methods.
    Fujii K; Doi H; Matsuoka S; Nagano M; Sato H; Yamanaka H
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210357. PubMed ID: 30703107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Monitoring of multiple fish species by quantitative environmental DNA metabarcoding surveys over two summer seasons.
    Wu L; Osugi T; Inagawa T; Okitsu J; Sakamoto S; Minamoto T
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2024 Jan; 24(1):e13875. PubMed ID: 37830396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. eDNA metabarcoding: a promising method for anuran surveys in highly diverse tropical forests.
    Lopes CM; Sasso T; Valentini A; Dejean T; Martins M; Zamudio KR; Haddad CFB
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2017 Sep; 17(5):904-914. PubMed ID: 27987263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A manager's guide to using eDNA metabarcoding in marine ecosystems.
    Gold Z; Wall AR; Schweizer TM; Pentcheff ND; Curd EE; Barber PH; Meyer RS; Wayne R; Stolzenbach K; Prickett K; Luedy J; Wetzer R
    PeerJ; 2022; 10():e14071. PubMed ID: 36405018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. eDNA metabarcoding as a promising conservation tool for monitoring fish diversity in a coastal wetland of the Pearl River Estuary compared to bottom trawling.
    Zou K; Chen J; Ruan H; Li Z; Guo W; Li M; Liu L
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Feb; 702():134704. PubMed ID: 31726353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modeling the ecological status response of rivers to multiple stressors using machine learning: A comparison of environmental DNA metabarcoding and morphological data.
    Fan J; Wang S; Li H; Yan Z; Zhang Y; Zheng X; Wang P
    Water Res; 2020 Sep; 183():116004. PubMed ID: 32622231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative monitoring of diverse fish communities on a large scale combining eDNA metabarcoding and qPCR.
    Pont D; Meulenbroek P; Bammer V; Dejean T; Erős T; Jean P; Lenhardt M; Nagel C; Pekarik L; Schabuss M; Stoeckle BC; Stoica E; Zornig H; Weigand A; Valentini A
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2023 Feb; 23(2):396-409. PubMed ID: 36151931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Environmental DNA of insects and springtails from caves reveals complex processes of eDNA transfer in soils.
    Lunghi E; Valle B; Guerrieri A; Bonin A; Cianferoni F; Manenti R; Ficetola GF
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jun; 826():154022. PubMed ID: 35202680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Capturing open ocean biodiversity: Comparing environmental DNA metabarcoding to the continuous plankton recorder.
    Suter L; Polanowski AM; Clarke LJ; Kitchener JA; Deagle BE
    Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):3140-3157. PubMed ID: 32767849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.